1 / 33

Mining Accountability Data: Making It Real

Mining Accountability Data: Making It Real. March 6, 2014 Deb Duffy, MORIC. Data Questions. Holcomb, 1998. What does the data tell you? What does the data not tell you? What are the implications for change? How would you plan for this at the district level?.

dean-chavez
Download Presentation

Mining Accountability Data: Making It Real

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mining Accountability Data: Making It Real March 6, 2014 Deb Duffy, MORIC

  2. Data Questions Holcomb, 1998 What does the data tell you? What does the data not tell you? What are the implications for change? How would you plan for this at the district level?

  3. Math Grades 3-8Major cluster results

  4. NYS Math Avg % 60.8% 58.6% 54.3% 52.7% 51.9% 46.4% DRAFT

  5. NYS Math Avg % 66.7% 64.7% 63% 61.1% 55.6% 53% 50% 45.5% 42.3% DRAFT

  6. NYS Math Avg % 63.6% 63.2% 57.1% 54.5% 53.6% 50% 50% 50% 40.9% DRAFT

  7. NYS Math Avg % 66.7% 64.7% 63% 61.1% 55.6% 53% 50% 45.5% 42.3% DRAFT

  8. NYS Math Avg % 63.6% 63.2% 57.1% 54.5% 53.6% 50% 50% 50% 40.9% DRAFT

  9. NYS Math Avg % 66.7% 64.7% 63% 61.1% 55.6% 52.9% 50% 45.5% 42.3% DRAFT

  10. NYS Math Avg % 63.2% 63.6% 57.1% 54.5% 53.6% 50% 50% 50% 40.9% DRAFT

  11. Released Question resultsRegional: MATH 2013

  12. NYS Math Major Cluster (Combined) % 60.8% 58.6% 54.3% 52.7% 51.9% 46.4% DRAFT

  13. Data Questions Holcomb, 1998 What does the data tell you? What does the data not tell you? What are the implications for change? How would you plan for this at the district level?

  14. ELA Grades 3 -- 8Reading vs writingInformational Text vs Literature

  15. NYS Read/Write SubscoreAvg % Gr 8 Avg: 62.1% Gr 7 Avg: 60.6% Gr 6 Avg: 60% Gr 4 Avg: 56.4% Gr 5 Avg: 56% Gr 3 Avg: 52.7% DRAFT

  16. NYS Reading/Writing Avg: 56.4% NYS Reading/Writing Avg: 56% NYS Reading/Writing Avg: 52.7% DRAFT

  17. NYS Reading/Writing Avg: 62.1% NYS Reading/Writing Avg 60% NYS Reading/Writing Avg: 60.6% DRAFT

  18. NYS Reading Avg: 61.3% NYS Reading Avg: 57.1% NYS Reading Avg: 54.8% DRAFT

  19. NYS Reading Avg: 61% NYS Reading Avg: 59.5% NYS Reading Avg: 59.5% DRAFT

  20. NYS Writing Avg: 54.2% NYS Writing Avg: 50% NYS Writing Avg: 50% DRAFT

  21. NYS Writing Avg: 66.7% NYS Writing Avg: 62.5% NYS Writing Avg: 58.3% DRAFT

  22. NYS Writing SubscoreAvg % Writing Avg: 66.7% Writing Avg: 62.5% Writing Avg: 58.3% Writing Avg: 54.2% Writing Avg: 50% Writing Avg: 50% DRAFT

  23. Released Question resultsRegional: ELA 2013

  24. Released Constructed Response Gr. 3-6 all Literature Gr. 7-8 all Informational Text 66.7% 62.5% 61.3% 61% 60% 59.5% 58.3% 57.1% 54.8% 54.2% 50% 50% DRAFT

  25. Data Questions Holcomb, 1998 What does the data tell you? What does the data not tell you? What are the implications for change? How would you plan for this at the district level?

  26. 2013 High school assessmentsregents: ELA & US History

  27. DRAFT

  28. January 2013 – January 2014 HS regional assessmentsparticipation in Government & Economics

  29. 24 pts 24 pts 14 pts

  30. 16 pts 24 pts 30 pts

  31. What Did You Learn?

More Related