1 / 13

Closeout Presentation and Final Report Procedures

Closeout Presentation and Final Report Procedures. Format: Closeout Presentation. Format: Final Report. Please Note: Recommendations are approved by the full committee and presented at the review closeout briefing.

dayo
Download Presentation

Closeout Presentation and Final Report Procedures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Closeout Presentationand Final ReportProcedures

  2. Format:Closeout Presentation

  3. Format:Final Report Please Note: Recommendations are approved by the full committee and presented at the review closeout briefing. Recommendations SHOULD NOT be changed or altered from the closeout report to the Final Report.

  4. Expectations • Present closeout reports in PowerPoint. • Forward your sections for each review report (in MSWord format) to Casey Clark, casey.clark@science.doe.gov, by Monday, August 4, 8:00 a.m. (EDT).

  5. Closeout Report on the DOE/SC CD-2/3 Review of the Muon g–2 Project Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory July 29-31, 2014 Kurt W. Fisher Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy http://www.science.doe.gov/opa/

  6. 2.1 AcceleratorR. Gerig / Subcommittee 1 • Do the proposed technical design and associated implementation approach satisfy the performance requirements? How has the project team ensured that the subsystems will be fully integrated? Are the CD-4 goals reasonable and well defined? • Is the management structure and resources adequate to deliver the proposed technical scope within the baseline budget and schedule as specified in the PEP? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-2 complete? • Has the project responded satisfactorily to the recommendations from the previous independent project review? • Is the detailed design sufficiently mature so that the project can commence procurement and fabrication? Are the current project cost and schedule projections consistent with the baseline cost and schedule in the PEP? Is the contingency adequate for risks? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-3 complete? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  7. 2.2 Storage RingS. Prestemon, LBNL / Subcommittee 2 • Do the proposed technical design and associated implementation approach satisfy the performance requirements? How has the project team ensured that the subsystems will be fully integrated? Are the CD-4 goals reasonable and well defined? • Is the management structure and resources adequate to deliver the proposed technical scope within the baseline budget and schedule as specified in the PEP? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-2 complete? • Has the project responded satisfactorily to the recommendations from the previous independent project review? • Is the detailed design sufficiently mature so that the project can commence procurement and fabrication? Are the current project cost and schedule projections consistent with the baseline cost and schedule in the PEP? Is the contingency adequate for risks? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-3 complete? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  8. 2.3 Technical IntegrationB. Wisniewski, SLAC / Subcommittee 3 • Do the proposed technical design and associated implementation approach satisfy the performance requirements? How has the project team ensured that the subsystems will be fully integrated? Are the CD-4 goals reasonable and well defined? • Is the management structure and resources adequate to deliver the proposed technical scope within the baseline budget and schedule as specified in the PEP? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-2 complete? • Has the project responded satisfactorily to the recommendations from the previous independent project review? • Is the detailed design sufficiently mature so that the project can commence procurement and fabrication? Are the current project cost and schedule projections consistent with the baseline cost and schedule in the PEP? Is the contingency adequate for risks? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-3 complete? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  9. 2.4 InstrumentationM. Ross, SLAC / Subcommittee 4 • Do the proposed technical design and associated implementation approach satisfy the performance requirements? How has the project team ensured that the subsystems will be fully integrated? Are the CD-4 goals reasonable and well defined? • Is the management structure and resources adequate to deliver the proposed technical scope within the baseline budget and schedule as specified in the PEP? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-2 complete? • Has the project responded satisfactorily to the recommendations from the previous independent project review? • Is the detailed design sufficiently mature so that the project can commence procurement and fabrication? Are the current project cost and schedule projections consistent with the baseline cost and schedule in the PEP? Is the contingency adequate for risks? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-3 complete? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  10. 3. Environment, Safety and HealthS. Trotter, ORNL / Subcommittee 6 • Is the management structure and resources adequate to deliver the proposed technical scope within the baseline budget and schedule as specified in the PEP? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-2 complete? • Are ES&H aspects being properly addressed given the project’s current stage of development? • Has the project responded satisfactorily to the recommendations from the previous independent project review? • Is the detailed design sufficiently mature so that the project can commence procurement and fabrication? Are the current project cost and schedule projections consistent with the baseline cost and schedule in the PEP? Is the contingency adequate for risks? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-3 complete? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  11. 4. Cost and ScheduleR. Lutha, DOE/ASO / Subcommittee 5 • Do the proposed technical design and associated implementation approach satisfy the performance requirements? How has the project team ensured that the subsystems will be fully integrated? Are the CD-4 goals reasonable and well defined? • Is the cost estimate and schedule consistent with the plan to deliver the technical scope? Is the contingency adequate for the risk? • Is the management structure and resources adequate to deliver the proposed technical scope within the baseline budget and schedule as specified in the PEP? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-2 complete? • Has the project responded satisfactorily to the recommendations from the previous independent project review? • Is the detailed design sufficiently mature so that the project can commence procurement and fabrication? Are the current project cost and schedule projections consistent with the baseline cost and schedule in the PEP? Is the contingency adequate for risks? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-3 complete? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

  12. 4. Cost and ScheduleR. Lutha, DOE/ASO / Subcommittee 5

  13. 5. Project ManagementD. Green, FNAL Emeritus / Subcommittee 6 • Do the proposed technical design and associated implementation approach satisfy the performance requirements? How has the project team ensured that the subsystems will be fully integrated? Are the CD-4 goals reasonable and well defined? • Is the management structure and resources adequate to deliver the proposed technical scope within the baseline budget and schedule as specified in the PEP? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-2 complete? • Has the project responded satisfactorily to the recommendations from the previous independent project review? • Is the detailed design sufficiently mature so that the project can commence procurement and fabrication? Are the current project cost and schedule projections consistent with the baseline cost and schedule in the PEP? Is the contingency adequate for risks? • Is the documentation required by DOE Order 413.3B for CD-3 complete? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations

More Related