1 / 1

Why carbon storage in Alberta?

CO 2 injection induced chemical composition and mechanical property change of shaly caprock Ming Liu(ming6@ualberta.ca), R. J. Chalaturnyk Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Canada. Why carbon storage in Alberta?. Methodology.

dawson
Download Presentation

Why carbon storage in Alberta?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CO2 injection induced chemical composition and mechanical property change of shaly caprock Ming Liu(ming6@ualberta.ca), R. J. Chalaturnyk Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Canada Why carbon storage in Alberta? Methodology Surface chemistry analysis results SEM imaging results • High greenhouse gas emission level • Carbon dioxide ranks No.1 • High storage potential • Chemical Composition • X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) was introduced to investigate the element change in the surface introduced by exposing to CO2 – rich brine. • Sample image using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) coupled with Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS). • Mechanical Property • Measurements of capillary entry pressures to study the impact of rock/brine/CO2 interaction. Intact 2 Day 1 Week Figure 1 Alberta annual greenhouse emission and gas type 2 Weeks 3 Weeks > 1 Month Rock/brine/CO2 interactions Figure 4 Overall SEM images of all the testing samples Table 1 Average atom concentrations from XPS (Unit : %) Chemistry analysis conclusions Sampling and Test Condition • Slight decrease in potassium and moderate decrease in aluminum indicate rock/brine/CO2 interactions have indeed resulted in caprock mineralogy change. • Significantly increase in carbon within the shale specimens providing some evidence for the potential of CO2 sorption in this shale that could increase the capacity of storage site. • Further investigations were need for longer reaction time. In order to prevent collapse of shale sample, special holder was used to protect the sample. 1 and 3 Weeks (sphere) 2 Weeks (a) (sphere and chain) 2 Weeks (b) (mixture of two) Figure 5 High resolution images of three types of clusters SEM imaging conclusions Figure 2 Conceptual diagram of a CO2 injection scheme and identified cluster of CO2/rock interactions (Gaus, 2009) • Rock/brine/CO2 interactions result in growth of clusters that disappear over time • There are three kinds of clusters : spherical, chain and mixture of two • Spherical cluster appear to be hollow (CO2trapping) Figure 3 Dimensions and photo of holder – rock system CO2 injectivity Caprock/brine/CO2 interaction • The test conditions are: • P = 2 MPa • T = 50⁰C • The brine composition is 3g/L NaCl Mechanical property change Change in Caprock chemistry

More Related