1 / 51

Professor John Strang National Addiction Centre, London, UK

Treatment of heroin/opiate addiction: current evidence, failure to apply, and areas warranting special attention. Professor John Strang National Addiction Centre, London, UK. declaration. DH, NTA, Home Office, NACD, WHO, UNODC

davidrosa
Download Presentation

Professor John Strang National Addiction Centre, London, UK

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Treatment of heroin/opiate addiction: current evidence, failure to apply, and areas warranting special attention Professor John Strang National Addiction Centre, London, UK

  2. declaration • DH, NTA, Home Office, NACD, WHO, UNODC • Diamo, Reckitt-Benkiser, Schering-Plough, Genus-Britannia, GW, Napp, Titan, Martindale, Catalent, ViroPharma-Auralis, Lundbeck, Astra-Zeneca • Phoenix House, Clouds House, Lifeline, Kent Council on Addictions, Action on Addiction, Society for the Study of Addiction

  3. major scientific reviews of evidence about methadone maintenance and buprenorphine maintenance (NICE; Cochrane); • NICE review of naltrexone maintenance; • NICE review of psychosocial aspects of opiate addiction treatment; • three recent/current research areas, being • * take-home emergency naloxone; • * major reduction of methadone deaths • * substantial benefits seen in the RIOTT trial

  4. Key references • Babor et al, (2010). Drug Policy and the Public Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. • Connock M et al, (2007). Methadone and buprenorphine: systematic review. Health Technology Assessment, 11 (9). • Adi Y et al, (2007). Oral naltrexone as a treatment for relapse prevention in formerly opioid-dependent drug users: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment, 11 (6). • FEAD website– critique of UK drug treatment provision – on website www.fead.org.uk – interview number 10 at http://www.fead.org.uk/video289/John-Strang-critiques-the-quality-of-drug-service-provision-and-oral-methadone-prescribing.html • NICE (2007) Psychosocial aspects of treatment of drug misuse (CG51). • Strang et al (2006). Take-home naloxone to prevent heroin overdose deaths. BMJ, 333; 614-615. • Strang et al (2010). Methadone, supervision and deaths:OD4 analyses. BMJ, 341; c4851. • Strang et al (2010) RIOTT main outcome results. Lancet, 375; 1885-1895.

  5. MMT + BMT

  6. Structured oral methadone maintenance programmes • It’s in the title • Maintenance • Dose – medication • Dose – psychosocial component • Context – staff attitudes • Coercion (soft); reinforcers/rewards • Methadone; buprenorphine; LAAM; SROM; … • Recovery-Orientated Methadone Maintenance

  7. U.K. Methadone treatment:benefits in the first month(Strang, Finch et al, 1997, Addiction Research)

  8. U.K. Methadone maintenance –changes in heroin use over time Source: Finch 2000 MD thesis

  9. Retention in treatment: methadone, buprenorphine, LAAM maintenance

  10. MMT + CM

  11. MMT + CM

  12. MMT + CM

  13. Naltrexone

  14. Naltrexone compliance

  15. Naltrexone compliance

  16. Retention in treatment: methadone, buprenorphine, LAAM maintenance

  17. Retention in treatment methadone/buprenorphine/LAAM vs. naltrexone

  18. Supervised methadone:a story of successful change

  19. OD4 • Defined Daily Doses • Overdose Deaths per (million) Defined Daily Doses (OD4)

  20. RIOTT trial of supervised heroin maintenance

  21. RIOTT research trial design

  22. RIOTT - data on ‘responders’ and ‘non-responders’ – broken down as % - at baseline (OOM, SIM, SIH)

  23. RIOTT - data on ‘responders’ and ‘non-responders’ – broken down as % - at Months 4-6 (OOM, SIM, SIH)

  24. RIOTT - data on ‘responders’ and ‘non-responders’ – broken down as % - at Months 4-6 (OOM, SIM, SIH)

  25. RIOTT - data on ‘responders’ and ‘non-responders’ – broken down as % - at Months 4-6 (OOM, SIM, SIH)

  26. RIOTT - data on ‘responders’ and ‘non-responders’ – broken down as % - at Months 4-6 (OOM, SIM, SIH)

  27. Percentage of participants not using illicit heroin by week (ITT sample)

  28. Take-home naloxone

  29. Drug-related deaths in England and Wales 1997 – 2002 (ONS)

  30. Drug-related deaths in England and Wales 1997 – 2002 (ONS)

More Related