1 / 29

Models for Program Planning in Health Promotion

Models for Program Planning in Health Promotion. Chapter 2. Planning Models: Background Information. Models serve as frames from which to build; Provide structure & organization for the planning process Many different models Common elements, but different labels.

dashiell
Download Presentation

Models for Program Planning in Health Promotion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Models for Program Planning in Health Promotion Chapter 2

  2. Planning Models: Background Information • Models serve as frames from which to build; Provide structure & organization for the planning process • Many different models • Common elements, but different labels A Generalized Model for Program Planning

  3. Background Information (con’t.) • No perfect model • Can be used in entirety, parts, & combinations • Three Fs of program planning help with selecting the appropriate model • Fluidity - steps are sequential • Flexibility - adapt to needs of stakeholders • Functionality - useful in improving health conditions • Categories • Practitioner driven • Consumer-based

  4. PRECEDE - PROCEED • PRECEDE - predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling constructs in education / ecological diagnosis & evaluation • PROCEED - policy, regulatory, and organizational constructs in educational & environmental development

  5. PRECEDE - PROCEED • Larry Green & Marshall Kreuter • PRECEDE created in early 1970s • PROCEED created in the 1980s • Best known & often used model • Theoretically grounded • Comprehensive in nature • Found in many government programs

  6. Phase 1 - Social Assessment • Assessment means… • Identify • Describe • Prioritize • Phase 1 - seeks to subjectively define the QOL (problems & priorities) of priority population • Self-assessment of needs & aspirations

  7. Phase 2 - Epidemiological Assessment • Epidemiology - study of the distribution & determinants of disease • What are the health problems associated with the desired QOL? • Not all problems health related; If Phase 2 not applicable, skip and move on to Phase 3.

  8. Phase 3 - Behavioral & Environmental Assessment • Behavior of priority population • Determining & prioritizing behavioral & environmental risk factors or conditions linked to the health problem • Environmental factors - determinants outside an individual, that can be modified to support behavior, health, or QOL • Once identified, must be prioritized

  9. Phase 4 - Educational & Ecological Assessment • Identifies & classifies factors that have potential to influence behavior or change the environment • Predisposing factors - antecedent; impact motivation; e.g., knowledge, attitudes , beliefs, values • Enabling factors - antecedent; barriers & vehicles; e.g., access, availability • Reinforcing factors - subsequent; feedback & rewards; e.g., incentives, disincentives • Priorities become focus of intervention

  10. Phase 5 - Administrative & Policy Assessment • Determine if capabilities & resources are available to develop & implement program • Close to the end of PRECEDE & moving toward PROCEED

  11. Phase 6 - Implementation • Beginning of PROCEED • Selection of methods and strategies of the intervention, for example, education &/or other resources • Program begins

  12. Phases 7, 8, & 9 - Evaluation • Process evaluation - measurements of implementation to control, assure, or improve the quality of the program • Impact evaluation - immediate observable effects of program • Outcome evaluation -long-term effects of the program • Line up with PRECEDE

  13. MATCH • Multilevel Approach to Community Health • Developed in late 1980s • Used by U.S. Government • Applied when behavioral & environmental risk & protective factors for disease / injury are known & general priorities determined • Includes ecological planning - levels of influence

  14. Phase 1 - Goals Selection • Select goals - consider prevalence, importance, & changeability • Select priority (target) population • Identify behaviors associated with health status • Identify environmental factors (barriers & vehicles)

  15. Phase 2 - Intervention Planning • In this phase intervention objectives are matched with intervention targets & intervention actions • Identify targets of intervention actions (TIAs); consider levels of influence

  16. Simons-Morton et al., (1995) Governments Organizations Communities Individuals McLeroy et al., (1988) Intrapersonal Interpersonal Institutional Community Public policy Ecological Approach

  17. Phase 2 - Intervention Planning • In this phase intervention objectives are matched with intervention targets & intervention actions • Identify targets of intervention actions (TIAs); consider levels of influence • Select intervention objectives (what will change?) • Intervention actions (activities / strategies) (how to change?)

  18. Remaining Phases of MATCH • 3 - Program Development (create program units or components) • 4 - Implementation (adoption, implementation, maintenance) • 5 - Evaluation (process, impact, & outcome)

  19. Consumer-Based Planning • Decisions based on consumer input & made with consumers in mind; include consumers throughout • Based on concepts from • health communication - strategies to inform & influence individual & community decisions to enhance health (NCI, 2002) • social marketing - planning process designed to influence the voluntary behavior of a specific audience segment to achieve a social rather than financial objective

  20. Consumer-Based Planning Models • CDCynergy, or Cynergy for short, “is a job aid or tool to help educators systematically conceptualize, plan, implement, and evaluate interventions within a public health context” (G. Cole, 2002) • SMART - Social Marketing Assessment and Response Tool

  21. About CDCynergy • Developed by the Office of Communication at the CDC in 1997 • First issued in 1998 • Developed initially for public health professionals at CDC with responsibilities for health education • Developed for health communication but…

  22. About CDCynergy (con’t.) • Because of widespread interest, CDC has made it available to others • CDCynergy 2001 is disseminated through SOPHE • To date $2.6 million has been spent to develop it • Wide-spread use will bring standardization • Models, examples, resources, consultants, & information on a single CD-ROM • Links to templates to create plans

  23. CDCynergy P 3: Plan Intervention (Is communication dominant or supportive?) P 5: Plan Evaluation Navigation controls: Contains 52 steps divided among the phases P 1: Describe Problem (identify & define) P 2: Analyze Problem (causes, goals, intervention strategies P 6: Implement Plan P 4: Develop Intervention • Other links • Lite • Glossary • Index • CDC Web • Help • My Plan Active buttons [change with phase & step] (examples, resources,& consultant) Non-changing buttons (tools for research & media library) There is also a supplemental resources CD for CDCynergy 3.0

  24. The future of CDCynergy • Plans to make CDCynergy web-based • Several versions & more to come • http://www.cdc.gov/communication/cdcynergy.htm

  25. Social Marketing Assessment & Response Tool (SMART)(Neiger, 1998) P 1: Preliminary Planning [problem, name in terms of behavior, develop goals, project costs] P 2: Consumer Analysis [segment priority population & determine needs, wants, & preferences]; also secondary & tertiary audiences P 3: Market Analysis [4Ps, competitors, & partners] P 4: Channel Analysis [interpersonal, small group, organizational, community, mass media] P 5: Developing Interventions, Materials, & Pretesting Implementation Evaluation

  26. Other Planning Models • A systematic Approach to Health Promotion (Healthy People 2010) • Components: goals, objectives, determinants of health, & health status • Mobilizing for Action Through Planning & Partnerships (MAPP) (NACCHO) • Components: Organizing, Visioning, Assessments, Identify Strategies Issues, Formulate Goals & Strategies, Action Cycle

  27. Other Planning Models (con’t.) • Assessment Protocol for Excellence in Public Health (APEX-PH) (NACCHO) [PACE-EH] • Components: Organizational capacity; Community Process, Completing the Cycle • Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) Analysis S W O T

  28. Other Planning Models (con’t.) • The Health Communication Model (NCI) • Healthy Plan-IT (CDC) • Components: Priority Setting, Establishing Goals, Outcome Objectives, Strategy, Evaluation, & Budget • Healthy Communities (Healthy Cities) (USDHHS) • Components: Mobilize, Assess, Plan for Action, Implement, Track Progress & Outcomes

  29. Models for Program Planning in Health Promotion Chapter 2 - The End

More Related