1 / 27

Conflicts over water – diversion, depletion, degradation

Conflicts over water – diversion, depletion, degradation. Introduction : when the ability to use water is diminished – through pollution, reduction in availability, or other harm – conflict usually results. Three sources of conflict:

dasha
Download Presentation

Conflicts over water – diversion, depletion, degradation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Conflicts over water – diversion, depletion, degradation • Introduction: when the ability to use water is diminished – through pollution, reduction in availability, or other harm – conflict usually results. • Three sources of conflict: • Diversion – re-allocation/transfer from one river basin (or aquifer) to another by tunnel, aqueduct, other means. • Depletion– using up available supply without replenishment. • Degradation – diminishing usefulness of water; e.g., through contaminants that cannot be easily removed, changing functioning of a water body.

  2. Water diversion as source of conflict • Many early civilizations arose through ability to divert water for agriculture/public supply: e.g., Sumeria (Iraq), China, Egypt, Rome. • Diversion requires administrative as well as engineering skills. • Some (e.g., Karl Wittfogel – 1950s, Donald Worster – 1990s) believe large-scale diversion shaped authoritarian character of ancient societies by: • Imposing centralized planning & control. • Enriching water-dependent elites/aristocrats. • Exploiting workers, encouraging slavery, serfdom. • Suppressing private property.

  3. Nile River irrigation - Egypt (c. 2000 B.C.)

  4. Roman Aqueduct – Segovia, Spain Built, 1st Century A.D. – still in use today

  5. Dujiang Irrigation project – Min River, China Built during Qin dynasty – 256 BC; near Chengdu, Sichuan Province

  6. Diversion and California • Urban growth (e.g., San Francisco and Los Angeles) and agriculture (e.g., Imperial Valley) drove demand for long-distance diversions. • California’s experience illustrates impacts: • Water rights - mining, agriculture, urban use led to acquiring of water rights –outright or sometimes secretly – rights became enshrined in law. • Ecological effects – reducing stream flow; introducing “exotic” fish species: • “Return flow” stipulations – e.g., Imperial Valley/Salton Sea. • “Fish screens” – Great Plains; under discussion in N. California (CALFED). • Social & economic effects –reduction of regional income, economic opportunities, quality of life (e.g., Owens Valley).

  7. Major diversions of water in California

  8. Ecological issues - Salton Sea (formed 1905) • Contemporary problems: • Nutrient inflow from surrounding farming regions (eutrophication). • High salinity due to evaporation & less inflow from Colorado River. • Dust along shoreline where evaporation has occurred. • Annual bird die-offs. 2005 photo

  9. Hydraulic gold mining impacts (N. California, 1850s) Placer County, CA – Sierra Nevada mountains

  10. Socio-economic issues: Owens Valley • Restoration efforts: • Return flows of 15,000 acre/ft./yr. • “Re-watering” portions of Owens and Mono Lakes, lower Owens River. • Restock sport fisheries – bluegill, bass, trout. • What won’t be restored: • Regional income. • Population. • Lands along valley that can be used for economic development. FROM: LA Department of Water and Power

  11. Depletion of supplies – a growing problem • Surface and groundwater supplies can be diminished beyond natural ability to be replenished. • Groundwater examples: • Las Vegas, NV – until 1980s, received 30% of water from aquifers and springs; now 0%; 90% from Colorado River, rest from N. Nevada. • Solution? Leave remaining springs a “natural reserve,” diversify imports, conserve, undertake aquifer recharge.

  12. Las Vegas – groundwater management Subsidence and “fissuring’ caused by groundwater drawdown – N. Las Vegas Lorenzi Park, west of downtown Las Vegas – one of last remaining “springs” At the original site of “The Meadows”

  13. Mississippi River Embayment Aquifer system • Memphis, TN – draws 160 million gallons/day from aquifer system shared with other states– water levels are dropping; wells becoming deeper/more expensive to drill: • Mississippi claims that 60/160 million g/d of Memphis’ water actually come from “beneath” northern part of their state – residents are losing 20% of their water due to Memphis’ pumping . • February 2010: U.S. Supreme Court refused to overturn appellate court ruling in favor of Memphis: “Mississippi had not shown real or substantial injury.” • If Memphis had lost, would have had to build a treatment plant and draw water from Mississippi River.

  14. Memphis, Tennessee

  15. Land Subsidence – San Joaquin Valley San Joaquin Geological Survey • Solution? Reduce groundwater pumping; recharge aquifer with surface flow.

  16. Evidence of land subsidence in San Joaquin Valley (1925-1977)

  17. Degrading riparian “function” • California example – Los Angeles River: • Until early 20th century – source of water supply for farms, orchards – through “zanjas” (ditches) used to move water. • 1930s to 2000s – an urban “flood control” corridor to permit commercial & residential development. • The future (2000 and beyond)?

  18. Los Angeles River – modern history Near Griffith Park (c. 1900) Seasonal floods - 1941 Flooding – Arroyo Seco (1913)

  19. LA River Today – Glendale area Los Angeles River today

  20. Los Angeles River Revitalization Master Plan • City of LA; LADWP, Army Corps of Engineers, public interest groups. Goals: • --Remove channelization along 32 miles of river – from Canoga Park to Vernon. • --Re-plant native vegetation: develop “greenways” & parks. • --Achieve flood abatement, improve water quality, celebrate cultural heritage of river, foster civic pride.

  21. Location map – Los Angeles River

  22. “Virtual” future –courtesy Los Angeles River Revitalization Master Plan

  23. A glimpse into the future? – Los Feliz area

  24. Mouth of Los Angeles River – Long Beach Golden Shore Marine Reserve – habitat restoration plan (2006)

  25. Benefits of Los Angeles River restoration (LARRMP) • Improved natural environment and a healthy, functioning River • Improved water quality throughout the River Corridor • Significant expansion of City’s open space system • Increased tourism and recreation-related revenues • Creation of new jobs • Increased economic investment and tax revenues

  26. Lessons – why we degrade rivers, how we can stop • Changing urban needs influence how we value rivers. • Initial settlement • Industrialization • Post-industrialization • Flood and drought influence perception of their usefulness; prompt us to harness and control them. • Post industrial change makes people find new respect for natural amenities & desirability of rivers as recreational, aesthetic, and community development assets.

More Related