1 / 6

110

His-XLG3C. His-XLG2C. His-XLG1C. 207. 79. 49. 32. 25. XLG3C. XLG1C. XLG2C. kDa. 207. 110. 79. 49. 32. 25. His-T475N. A. B. His-GPA1. His-XLG2C. His-RTV1. TRX. kDa. kDa. 110. 79. 110. 49. 32. 25. 15. C. D. His-XLG3. His-XLG2. His-XLG1. kDa. 207. 110. 79.

dasan
Download Presentation

110

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. His-XLG3C His-XLG2C His-XLG1C 207 79 49 32 25 XLG3C XLG1C XLG2C kDa 207 110 79 49 32 25 His-T475N A B His-GPA1 His-XLG2C His-RTV1 TRX kDa kDa 110 79 110 49 32 25 15 C D His-XLG3 His-XLG2 His-XLG1 kDa 207 110 79 49 32 25 Full-length No tag Supplemental Fig. 1. Purification of XLG, GPA1, and RTV1 proteins.A. His TRX tagged-GPA1, XLG2C, XLG2C(T475N), RTV1 and His-TRX were all expressed in E. coli as N-terminal 6His-tagged proteins and purified by Ni2+-NTA agarose column chromatography. Purified proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. B. 6X His TRX-tagged XLG C-termini (amino acids 486 to 888 for XLG1, 464 to 862 for XLG2, 433 to 849 for XLG3) and (C) 6xHis-tagged XLG full-length proteins were purified. All His-tagged proteins were fused to thioredoxin (TRX), which is about 12-15 kDa, between the 6X His tag and the main protein. D. Purification of XLG C-termini proteins lacking a tag. N-terminus GST fusion XLG C-terminus proteins were purified and then GST was cleaved by thrombin (Sigma). Arrows indicate designated proteins.

  2. A -GTPS GDP ATP GDP ▶ GTP ▶ 0 2 2 2 2 Time (h) B XLG2 full XLG2C (no tag) GDP ▶ GTP ▶ 0 15 60 120 0 15 60 120 Time (min) C 100 80 GTP remaining (%) 60 40 20 0 15 60 120 Time (min) Supplemental Fig. 2. Like XLG2C 6X His TRX-tagged protein, XLG2 full-length 6X His TRX-tagged and XLG2C (no tag) proteins have GTPase activities in the presence of Ca2+. A. Substrate competition test of XLG2C in the presence of Ca2+. Reactions were performed as described in Fig. 2E in the presence of competitors (3 M unlabeled GTPS, GDP or ATP).B. GTPase activities of full-length XLG2 and XLG2C (no tag) in the presence of Ca2+, demonstrating that neither truncation nor tag is required for GTPase activity. C.GTPase activity of GPA1 in the presence of 10 mM Mg2+ or Ca2+.

  3. A B XLG1C - Mg2+ Mn2+ Ca2+ 2 h GTPγS binding (%) ◀ GDP ◀ GTP 0 2 2 2 2 Time (h) Ca2+ Mg2+ D C 2 h 100 ◀ GDP 80 GTP hydrolysis (%) 60 40 ◀ GTP 20 0 XLG1C GTPS GDP ATP None S497N XLG1 full Competitor Supplemental Fig. 3.XLG1 has GTP binding and GTPase activities in the presence of Ca2+. A.[35S]GTPS binding to XLG1C, its mutant and GPA1 in the presence of CaCl2 or MgCl2. Amount of [35S]GTPS binding to XLG2, its mutant form XLG1C(S497N) and GPA1 was measured after a 2 hour incubation in the presence of CaCl2 or MgCl2. B. GTPase activity of XLG1Cin the presence of different cofactors, showing preference for Ca2+. C. GTPase activity of full-length XLG1, XLG1C and XLG1C(S497N) in the presence of Ca2+. D. Substrate competition test of XLG1Cin the presence of Ca2+, showing specificity for GTP.

  4. A B XLG3C - Mg2+ Mn2+ Ca2+ GTPγS binding (%) ◀ GDP ◀ GTP 0 2 2 2 2 Time (h) Ca2+ Mg2+ C D 2 h ◀ GDP 100 80 GTP hydrolysis (%) 60 ◀ GTP 40 20 XLG3C S444N XLG3 full 0 None GTPS GDP ATP Supplemental Fig. 4.XLG3 has GTP binding and GTPase activities in the presence of Ca2+. A.[35S]GTPS binding to XLG3C, its mutant form XLG3C(S444N) and GPA1 in the presence of CaCl2 or MgCl2. Amount of [35S]GTPS binding to XLG3C, its mutant and GPA1 was measured after 2 hour-incubation in the presence of CaCl2 or MgCl2. B.GTPase activity of XLG3Cin the presence of different cofactors, showing preference for Ca2+. C. GTPase activity of full-length XLG3, XLG3C and XLG3C(S444N) in the presence of Ca2+. D. Substrate competition test of XLG3Cin the presence of Ca2+, showing specificity for GTP.

  5. 65 60 55 50 45 40 Fold change 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Cold treatment (Time) Supplemental Fig. 5.RTV1 mRNA expression is up-regulated by vernalization. Expression of RTV1 and XLG2 under cold treatment. RTV1 and XLG2 transcript levels were normalized to ACTIN2 levels using the formula CT = CT(each gene) – CT(ACTIN2). One-week old Col seedlings on plates were treated with the indicated duration of cold treatment (4C). Real-time PCR was used to determine the level of RTV1 mRNA expression. Relative fold changes were shown compared between cold-treated and no cold-treated Col plants with no cold-treated plants set equal to 1.RD29A was used as a positive control for a cold responsive gene(Zhu et al., 2004) and the repression of FLC was used as a positive control for a vernalization responsive gene(Sung and Amasino, 2004)

  6. RTV1 (µg) 0 0.5 1 Protein-DNA complex Free probe Supplemental Fig. 6.RTV1 binds to a DNA fragment from the DFR promoter, which is not flowering-related. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) of RTV1 using 400 bp DFRpromoter-derived DNA fragment. RTV1 protein (0-28 nM; 0-1 g) and 400-bp radiolabelled double-stranded DFR probe were incubated and then separated on a 5% tris-borate EDTA-polyacrylamide gel.

More Related