1 / 49

RAC Appeal Process Strategies

RAC Appeal Process Strategies. Patrick C. Devine, Jr. Courtney A. Miller. Demonstration Results. RACs identified $1.03 billion in improper payments 96% of identified improper payments = overpayments After appeals, etc., $693 million returned to Medicare Trust Fund

darrell
Download Presentation

RAC Appeal Process Strategies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. RAC Appeal Process Strategies Patrick C. Devine, Jr. Courtney A. Miller

  2. Demonstration Results • RACs identified $1.03 billion in improper payments • 96% of identified improper payments = overpayments • After appeals, etc., $693 million returned to Medicare Trust Fund • 34% of provider appeals successful

  3. Demonstration Project • Take Aways: • Take steps to limit exposure for improper payment claims • Before a RAC review • Understand the review and appeals process if subject to RAC review

  4. Limit Exposure • Develop a RAC Response Team Now • Include members from all areas of risk • On-going duties • Team responsible for entire RAC process • Assessing areas of risk • Keeping track of all record requests • Implementing compliance strategies • Handling all RAC reviews and appeals from start to finish • Key person for all RAC communications

  5. Limit Exposure • Educate staff on Medicare billing issues • Focus on areas of known weaknesses • Learn from colleagues, the Demonstration Project and other sources • Medical necessity • Coding errors • RAC Status Documents (www.cms.gov/rac) • OIG Work Plan

  6. Audit Areas and Top Error by Provider Type Source: Medicare RAC Program: An Evaluation of the 3-Year Demonstration

  7. Limit Exposure • Self Audits • Self Disclosure • Important to work with legal counsel • Legal obligations • Process for Voluntary Refunds • Benefits and Consequences • Voluntary refunds will exclude the claims from RAC review

  8. Overview of the RAC Review/Appeal Process • RAC Review • Initial Determination • Recoupment • Informal Appeal: Rebuttal • Formal Appeal • 5 levels

  9. Overview of Review and Appeals Process Source: American Hospital Association

  10. RAC Review • 2 Types of reviews • Automated (software searching for clear errors) • Complex (review of patient records) • RAC’s authority to request records is subject to limits • All requests should be channeled through RAC Team

  11. RAC Review • Provider must provide requested records within 45 days • Failure = RAC authorized to find improper payment • Failure = potential loss of right to appeal • RAC Team should control this process • Extensions possible

  12. Initial Determination • RAC’s Initial Determination • Timeframe for RAC determination • 60 days after receiving records • Failure to respond = ??? • Possible defense • Written notice to provider • Reason for denial

  13. Recoupment • If RAC identifies overpayment, Medicare typically uses recoupment to recover • Begins 41 days after date of demand • Provider can delay recoupment until the 3rd stage of appeal process • Deadlines: appeal v. delay of recoupment • After Reconsideration stage, provider can delay recoupment through an extended repayment plan

  14. Recoupment Timeline

  15. Recoupment & Interest • Interest accrues from date of final determination, unless paid within 30 days • Continues to accrue during appeal process • Fixed interest rate (currently 11.38%) • Factor to consider before appealing • Pay and then appeal?

  16. Rebuttal • Provider can rebut RAC’s initial determination • File with RAC within 15 days after receipt • When to consider: New documentation to support the claim • Not required • Does NOT toll deadline for filing formal appeal

  17. Formal Appeals Process • 5 Levels (Medicare Appeals Process) • Redetermination • Reconsideration • Administrative Law Judge Hearing • Medicare Appeals Council Review • Federal Court

  18. FI, carrier 60 days+14 day extension 180-194 Days Notice Letter 120 Days to File 180 Days to File 240 Days QIC 60-day time limit 60 Days to File 780- 794 Days 150 Days ALI 90-day time limit 60 Days to File 150 Days MAC 90-day time limit 60 Days to File US District Court Last Level- No time limit 60+ Days Appeals Timeline

  19. Results of the Demonstration • Connelly v. Viant??

  20. Factors to Consider • Time • Cost of appeal • Resources • Quality of documentation • Implications • Clinical support • Legal involvement

  21. Outcomes • Full Reversal • No further action, RAC cannot appeal • RAC must refund contingency fee • Provider may be paid interest • Partial Reversal • Denial

  22. Level 1: Redetermination • File request for redetermination with FI • If not inpatient hospital, then with Carrier • Rebuttal not required • Must file within 120 days of receipt of RAC determination • Exception for “Good Cause”

  23. Level 1: Redetermination • Request must be in writing • Use CMS form 20027 or develop your own • Provide evidence explaining why provider disagrees • Raise all issues and submit all relevant documents • No hearing, decision based on written appeal

  24. Level 1: Redetermination • No minimum requirements for amount in controversy • FI has 60 days to approve/reverse initial determination

  25. Level 2: Reconsideration • File with Qualified Independent Contractor (“QIC”) • Virginia = Maximus • Must file within 180 days after receipt of notice of Redetermination • Use CMS Form 20033 or develop your own

  26. Level 2: Reconsideration • Written appeal; no appearance necessary • Raise all issues and submit all evidence • If not, excluded from consideration in subsequent appeals • No minimum amount of controversy

  27. Level 2: Reconsideration • QIC conducts an independent, on the record review • Medical necessity reviewed by panel of MDs • QIC authority • Must follow LCDs, CMS rulings, laws

  28. Level 2: Reconsideration • Within 60 days of receipt of request, QIC must mail written notice of action: • Reconsideration • Inability to complete the reconsideration • Dismissal of claim • If QIC fails to act within 60 days, provider may appeal to ALJ

  29. Level 3: ALJ Hearing • Must be filed within 60 days of receipt of notice of QIC’s reconsideration • Use CMS Form 20034A • $120.00 min. amount in controversy • Hearing typically by tele-conference • Usually within 90 days • Develop good oral testimony • No new evidence

  30. ALJ Hearing • Evidence is limited to what was presented for reconsideration (QIC) • Exception for good cause • ALJ can subpoena witnesses/documents • ALJ will consider all issues previously considered

  31. ALJ Hearing • Within 90 days of the hearing, ALJ must issue written decision • Remand to QIC • Dismissal • Approve

  32. Level 4: MAC Review • Must file request within 60 days after receipt of ALJ’s decision • MAC may review ALJ decision on its own motion or based on referral by CMS • MAC will issue its final decision within 90 days of receipt of request for review

  33. Level 4: MAC Review • MAC reviews the ALJ’s decision de novo • Limited to the evidence in the ALJ’s administrative record • In some cases, briefs requested • No right to a hearing • MAC may adopt, reverse, modify or remand the case to ALJ

  34. Level 5: Federal Court • File appeal within 60 days of receipt of MAC’s decision • Min. amount in controversy - $1,220 • File in USDC in the provider’s district

  35. Level 5: Federal Court • Limited purpose: questioning the decision of the MAC and the findings of the ALJ • Evidence limited to ALJ record • No deadline for decision • No appeal from this level • Entire process can take up to two years

  36. Appeal Strategies • Advocate the Merits • Treating Physician Rule • Waiver of Liability • Provider Without Fault • Reopening Not Based on Good Cause • Challenging the Statistics • Constitutional Challenge

  37. Advocating the Merits • Not technically a “defense” • Factual and legal arguments supporting payment • Prepare position paper • Use qualified expert to confirm medical necessity

  38. Treating Physician Rule • Medical necessity • Treating physician in the best position to judge • Physician’s determination should be given more weight than RAC • RAC uses medical professionals who have never met or assessed the patient

  39. Waiver of Liability • Medical Necessity • Section 1879(a) of the Social Security Act • Payment permitted if provider “did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that payment would not be made for such services”

  40. Waiver of Liability • Maintain records of all communications with Medicare representatives • i.e. Overpayment claim overturned in past

  41. Provider Without Fault • Medical Necessity • Section 1870 of the Social Security Act • Provider entitled to payment when the provider is without fault and denial of the claim is deemed be against equity and good conscience

  42. Provider Without Fault • Generally, provider considered to be without fault if: • Exercised reasonable care • Made full disclosure of all material facts • Had a reasonable basis for assuming payment was correct

  43. Provider Without Fault • Considers various factors • Age, linguistic limitations, etc. • Document phone calls, guidance from CMS or carrier. • Individual communications • General communications to provider and supplier community

  44. Reopening Not Based on Good Cause • RACs must adhere to regulatory timeframes for reopening initial determinations • For Medicare generally: • Within 1 year – for any reason • Within 4 years – for good cause • No deadline if reliable evidence of fraud • RAC limited 3-year look-back period • Only back to October 2007

  45. Reopening Not Based on Good Cause • Good Cause: • New and material evidence (not readily available or known) OR • Obvious error made at the time of determination • Recent Transmittal: A contractor’s decision to reopen based on the existence of good cause, or refusal to reopen after determining good cause does not exist, is not subject to appeal.

  46. Challenging the Statistics • RACs may extrapolate in certain circumstances • Must follow Medicare’s statistical guidelines • Use a third party expert to challenge the validity of the extrapolation

  47. Constitutional Challenge • Possible Argument?

  48. Conclusion • Take steps to prepare NOW • Establish a RAC Team • Limit exposure • Maintain adequate records • Appeals process • Deadlines • Defenses

  49. Questions • Patrick C. Devine, Jr. pdevine@williamsmullen.com757.629-0614 • Courtney A. Miller cmiller@williamsmullen.com 757.629.0665

More Related