1 / 31

Lynn Hill Spragens, MBA Spragens and Associates, LLC Lynn@Lspragens 919-309-4606

How to use Financial Data to Strengthen your PC program, increase referrals, and Support your clinical mission. Lynn Hill Spragens, MBA Spragens and Associates, LLC Lynn@Lspragens.com 919-309-4606. Stage of development vs. measures. Start-up plan = hypothesis and pro forma

Download Presentation

Lynn Hill Spragens, MBA Spragens and Associates, LLC Lynn@Lspragens 919-309-4606

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How to use Financial Data to Strengthen your PC program, increase referrals, and Support your clinical mission Lynn Hill Spragens, MBA Spragens and Associates, LLC Lynn@Lspragens.com 919-309-4606

  2. Stage of development vs. measures • Start-up plan = hypothesis and pro forma • Early activities = operational and process measures • 1 year + = comparison to goals, and financial cost impact with actual data • Each year = matching of goals, staffing, budget, and proven impact www.CAPC.org

  3. Our focus today • In the CAPC seminars and the Palliative Care Leadership Center visits, the focus is on the initial stage and the pro forma. • Our focus is on early stage operational measures that help with growth and management • This builds a base for future support www.CAPC.org

  4. What did the Pro Forma Promise? • Activity level (new patients) • Impact (pain and symptoms, satisfaction) • Impact (cost avoidance, LOS) • Team Composition • Other activities www.CAPC.org

  5. Implementation Steps • Use recommended “rounding tool” • Record data from tool + demographics in a database • Establish dashboard for monthly management, and for quarterly or semi-annual sponsor reports (include financials at semi-annual or annual periods) www.CAPC.org

  6. Dashboard components • New patients and Aver. Daily Census • Source of referrals and location of patients • LOS pre and post referral (average and distribution) • Impact on symptoms • Cost avoidance and billing revenue (less frequent) • Patient, family, or staff satisfaction www.CAPC.org

  7. Essential Measures: Program Referrals & Census www.CAPC.org

  8. Essential Measures: Referral Sources www.CAPC.org

  9. Essential Measures: Pre-Referral Days’ IntervalAverages and Distribution of LOS www.CAPC.org

  10. Essential Measures: Post-Referral Days before Discharge www.CAPC.org

  11. Essential Measures: Pain & Symptom ManagementExample: Include multiple measures in actual report!! www.CAPC.org

  12. Longer term Financial Impact • Include updated budget re “budget to actual” for staffing and other expenses • Include information on net billing revenue, showing volume and ave. payment and coding breakdown • Retrospectively match your database with hospital finance, and run “cost avoidance” • Ask Brad (brad@lspragens.com) for instructions www.CAPC.org

  13. Example of Impact on Inpatient Costs: Making Cost Avoidance REAL Source: T.J. Smith, MD, et al, VCU Massey Cancer Center, manuscript, “Palliative Care Unit Costs”, 2002, NOT FOR FURTHER DISTRIBUTION OR REPLICATION WITHOUT AUTHOR’S PERMISSION. www.CAPC.org

  14. Palliative Care: Sources of Direct Cost Savings (Based on 583 palliative care consult patients discharged alive. First days and last days of stays excluded.) www.CAPC.org

  15. Team Meetings • Premise: the team meets at least monthly to review progress and make plans (vs. daily or weekly patient care meetings) • You review the data together, sometimes with invited guests (your sponsor, data analyst, case manager?) – goal – identify opportunities and next steps www.CAPC.org

  16. Team Meeting – Suggestions • Review workload (may require simple time tracking methods periodically) – patient care, education, admin, other • Discuss practice variations on the team! • Widen the ad-hoc network you work with • Challenge generalizations; search for specifics, then use them www.CAPC.org

  17. Use the data to build Referral strategy • Compare to baseline data and hypothesis • Compare to concurrent info re deaths, outlier stays, and multiple admissions • LOS > 20 days by unit and service • >=4 admissions/yr by DRG and service • Deaths by unit and service • Who are you NOT hearing from? Where do you need to be visible? www.CAPC.org

  18. Evaluate Workload & Opportunities • If you could be busier, reach out to high yield services wt more rounding, “detailing”, testing flags or protocols, formal check-in’s with the ED, ICU, hospitalists • If you are very busy, what is the opportunity cost of what you are not doing? Estimate value, demonstrate current results, leverage for resources. www.CAPC.org

  19. Double check • Are you “too busy” because • Not using / getting MSW help – evaluate! • Being too open-ended re nights and weekends – try setting parameters for family meetings, etc. • You do it yourself vs. coaching the primary care team or providing skills to floor staff? • Chaos to schedule makes it more stressful? • Not letting team “know what you need”? www.CAPC.org

  20. All requests are data points • How do you track requests you can’t fulfill? (hours, location, outpatient, skills, etc.) • How can each answer solicit good information? • Have you enlisted case management to help you track unmet need? www.CAPC.org

  21. Back to VOLUME • Appropriate referrals are the lifeblood of the program • Growth (within reason) supports diversification and a healthy team • Assess who you have, and who you do not have • Repeat some of the initial assessment process www.CAPC.org

  22. Observation • Early growth may be fast (low hanging fruit), • Next 6 months may be slow (lack of penetration / awareness) • Eventually (1 year – 2 years) you get credibility and awareness, and “passive referrals” grow rapidly – be prepared! www.CAPC.org

  23. Costs: Methods influence outcomes For illustration only; not predictive of local results 30% of variable costs = $200, 30% of direct = $400 www.CAPC.org

  24. Points re Direct and Variable • The shorter the time frame, the more items are fixed; • Organizations who can look to longer term sustainable, structural, cultural changes can give higher credit to cost savings www.CAPC.org

  25. Contribution Margin: Capacity • If “on average” the net revenue from a case = total costs • And days saved can be re-deployed into new cases (requires coordination and timing) • Then Total cost - “variable cost” is the contribution margin = fixed costs; in our example, the value of saved days redeployed = $1400! www.CAPC.org

  26. Tracking LOS impact • This is what we are LEAST good at • Requires negotiation, hypothesis, and agreement on methodology UP FRONT • Approaches • Define the broad DRG/LOS/Mortality risk group in the baseline that will be your comparison, then diligently compare • Keep a diary with representative cases and good notes on outlier cases • Brainstorm ideas that fit your place! www.CAPC.org

  27. Other finance special topics • What is the “opportunity cost” of a 5 day vs. 7 day service? Consider for staffing/volume tradeoffs • In proforma (variables page) we use 50% of deaths (as appropriate) and 60% as ratio of patients who do not die to deaths – what does this mean? www.CAPC.org

  28. Ratio • If 40% of an average program’s referrals are for patients who are actively dying (die in the hospital), then 60% are discharged alive • If we know that there are 713 deaths total in the hospital and we guess that ½ of these might be appropriate for palliative care, what might we deduce about total patients who might be appropriate for palliative care? www.CAPC.org

  29. Ratio, continued Deaths x % appropriate (50%) (1- ratio of live discharges to deaths) = 713 x 50% 40% = 891 potential patients (then x capture rate) www.CAPC.org

  30. Conclusions • Pro formas are only as good as your work and ownership of the “reasonable-ness” of assumptions • Monthly dashboards should strive to track the key variables of your pro forma • There is an “opportunity cost” to inadequate resources • Longer term vision can support higher value to cost savings • Capacity and LOS can be highest leverage, if tracked www.CAPC.org

  31. Questions Ask now, or email me at Lynn@LSpragens.com We are interested in your concerns, even if we don’t have answers (yet!)!! www.CAPC.org

More Related