Online instructional strategies that affect learner motivation
1 / 28

Online Instructional Strategies that Affect Learner Motivation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Online Instructional Strategies that Affect Learner Motivation. Albert L. Ingram, Ph.D. Ruth Watson, Ph.D. Kent State University. Online Learning. Increasing agreement on the importance of active and interactive strategies for learning Student discussions Cooperative learning

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Online Instructional Strategies that Affect Learner Motivation' - dareh

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Online instructional strategies that affect learner motivation

Online Instructional Strategies that Affect Learner Motivation

Albert L. Ingram, Ph.D.

Ruth Watson, Ph.D.

Kent State University

Online learning
Online Learning

  • Increasing agreement on the importance of active and interactive strategies for learning

    • Student discussions

    • Cooperative learning

    • Collaborative learning

What about motivation
What about Motivation?

  • What makes students want to continue to learn?

  • Special problems with online motivation

    • How does instructor know?

    • What can instructor do to affect motivation?

Do instructional strategies affect motivation
Do instructional strategies affect motivation?

  • Focus on strategies emphasizing interactions among students

  • Four strategies

    • Small group discussions

    • Role playing

    • Brainstorming

    • Interviewing

Small group discussions
Small Group Discussions

  • Build on group experiences

  • Formulate ideas

  • Build relationships

  • Students take responsibility for own learning

Role playing
Role Playing

  • Real world problems

  • Small groups

  • Perspective-taking

  • Online role playing reduces self-consciousness, anxiety


  • Creative problem-solving

  • Small groups

  • Idea generation

  • Suspension of criticism

  • Analysis comes later


  • Bring people together

  • Cultivate relationships

  • Independent activity for students

  • Learners must develop and ask questions

Learning styles
Learning Styles

  • Assumption that independent learners do best in online learning

  • Spread of online learning means that people with variety of styles will be in online courses

  • How do we teach styles other than independent?

  • How are different styles motivated?

Grasha s social learning styles
Grasha’sSocial Learning Styles

  • Independent

  • Dependent

  • Competitive

  • Collaborative

  • Avoidant

  • Participant

Styles and motivation
Styles and Motivation

  • Competitive motivated by teacher-centered activity

  • Collaborative prefers working in small groups and may have difficulty working alone

  • Avoidant does not like teacher-student interaction

  • Participant enjoys discussing with others; may place the needs of others first

  • Dependent prefers teacher-centered instruction, do only what is required, and want clear instructions

  • Independent prefers to learn what is important to them

Measuring motivation
Measuring Motivation

  • Keller’s ARCS model

    • Attention

    • Relevance

    • Confidence

    • Satisfaction

  • Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS)


  • Participants

    • 6 instructors

    • N=64 students

  • Procedure

    • GRSLSS

    • Baseline IMMS

    • Participate in learning activity

    • IMMS


  • Interaction style X Strategy

  • Motivation is dependent variable

  • Interviewing (n=9), role play (n=25), brainstorming (n=31), small group (n=48)

Data Online Instructional Strategies

  • Self-test into Social Learning Style categories

    • four categories represented: Collaborative, Dependent, independent, Participant

  • Different instructors used different strategies

Baseline motivation total and subscales
Baseline Motivation - Total and Subscales Online Instructional Strategies

Styles motivation baseline
Styles - Motivation Baseline Online Instructional Strategies

  • Collaborative -- lowest baseline confidence score

  • Participant learners -- highest total baseline motivation score and highest scores for attention, relevance, and satisfaction

  • Dependent learners -- lowest total baseline motivation scores and lowest scores for attention, relevance, and satisfaction

  • Independent learners -- highest baseline confidence score

Effects of strategies on motivation
Effects of Strategies on Motivation Online Instructional Strategies

Effects of styles
Effects of Styles Online Instructional Strategies

Total (ARCS) Results

Discussion styles
Discussion - Styles Online Instructional Strategies

  • Most online learners are not independent

  • Collaborative learners motivated by all strategies

  • Participant learners motivated by all except interviewing

Discussion styles1
Discussion - Styles Online Instructional Strategies

  • Dependent learners motivated by small group discussions and interviews, not by role playing and brainstorming

  • Independent learners motivated by brainstorming, demotivated by small group discussions, unchanged by interviewing

Discussion strategies
Discussion - Strategies Online Instructional Strategies

  • Interactive strategies increase motivation

  • Interviewing showed most increase

    • Followed by brainstorming and small group discussions

  • Role playing lowered motivation overall

  • Results varied according to ARCS subscales

Discussion interactions
Discussion - Interactions Online Instructional Strategies

  • Many of the hypothesized interactions between style and strategy were confirmed, but not all

  • There were clearly many such interactions, however.

Limitations Online Instructional Strategies

  • Sample size: not enough individuals in all style categories

  • Teaching/learning strategies depended on implementation by independent teachers

  • Learners may test high in more than one category PLUS categories are not fixed

  • Activities may be compatible with different styles for different reasons

Implications Online Instructional Strategies

  • “Learner-centered” strategies and online learning are increasingly popular

  • Choosing good active learning strategies can lead to higher student motivation

  • Especially important for high-level goals and objectives

  • Explicit attention to motivation will help

  • Effects will vary for learning styles

Conclusions Online Instructional Strategies

  • Importance of studying motivation for learners of all social learning preferences

  • Majority of online learners may not be independent

  • Larger samples may find learners in all categories

  • More strategies can be studied

Conclusions Online Instructional Strategies

  • Multiple use of the GRSLSS instrument after each online instructional strategy

    • Which strategies help learners migrate from one category to another

    • Learning styles not fixed

    • We can improve online learning experience