1 / 8

Proposal for an A&S Course Evaluation Web Site

Proposal for an A&S Course Evaluation Web Site. Faculty Council Meeting February 6, 2006. Advantages of the Proposed A&S Web Site. Postings would occur with greater accuracy, reliability and promptness compared to the current SGA web site. A VUnet ID will be required for access

daquan-neal
Download Presentation

Proposal for an A&S Course Evaluation Web Site

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Proposal for an A&S Course Evaluation Web Site Faculty Council Meeting February 6, 2006

  2. Advantages of the ProposedA&S Web Site • Postings would occur with greater accuracy, reliability and promptness compared to the current SGA web site. • A VUnet ID will be required for access • Improved management of the site with appropriate restrictions governing access. • A disclaimer can be added relating to the importance of looking at several sources of information in making a decision about a given course.

  3. Formatting • Results for Questions 1-9 and 15 will be included for each course, except as noted below. • Data will be presented as histograms rather than means and SDs. • The number of students enrolled and the number responding to each question will be displayed. • Access will be permitted to one course at the time. • Data mining will be difficult. • Goal of making 3 academic years of data available to students.

  4. Exceptions • Written comments by students will not be included. • A course will not be included if there is less than a 50% response. • A junior faculty member may petition the Dean through his or her department chair to withhold course evaluation data. • Any faculty member may also petition the Dean through his or her department chair for compelling reasons (e.g. family emergency, illness, newly designed course, taking over a course in mid-semester, etc.)

  5. Peer Comparisons Yes, publicly accessible: Rice University University of Chicago Yes, password-protected: Columbia University (some departments) Georgetown University Johns Hopkins University Northwestern University Washington University in St. Louis Yale University (50% of questions are accessible to students)

  6. Peer Comparisons Student managed and password-protected: Brown University Harvard University Princeton University Stanford University University of Pennsylvania University of Virginia Vanderbilt University

  7. Peer Comparisons No Student Access to Course Evaluations: Cornell University Dartmouth University Duke University* Emory University Notre Dame* University of California-Berkeley* UCLA University of Michigan * online web site under discussion

  8. Features of the Web Site SGA's website Test web site #1 Test web site #2

More Related