π 0 Lifetime from the PrimEx Experiments

1 / 37

# π 0 Lifetime from the PrimEx Experiments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

π 0 Lifetime from the PrimEx Experiments. Outline  0 and QCD symmetries PrimEx-I result PrimEx-II status Summary. Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington (for the PrimEx Collaboration). Properties of  0.  0 is the lightest hadron: m  = 135 MeV.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' π 0 Lifetime from the PrimEx Experiments' - daquan-conley

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### π0 Lifetime from the PrimEx Experiments

Outline

• 0 and QCD symmetries
• PrimEx-I result
• PrimEx-II status
• Summary

Liping Gan

University of North Carolina Wilmington

(for the PrimEx Collaboration)

Properties of 0
• 0 is the lightest hadron:

m = 135 MeV

• 0 is unstable.

0→ γγ B.R.(0 →γγ)=(98.8±0.032)%

 = B.R.( 0 →γγ)/(0 →γγ)

 0.8 x 10-16 second

Spontaneous Chiral Symmetry Breaking Gives Rise to π0

In massless quark limit

Massless Goldstone Bosons

Corrections to theory:

• Non-zero quark masses generate meson masses
• Quark mass differences cause mixing among the mesons

Since π0 is the lightest quark-antiquark system in nature, the corrections are small.

k1

p

• 0→ decay proceeds primarily via the chiral anomaly in QCD.
• The chiral anomaly prediction is exact for massless quarks:

k2

• Γ(0)is one of the few quantities in confinement region that QCD can

calculate precisely to higher orders!

• Corrections to the chiral anomaly prediction:

Calculations in NLO ChPT:

• Γ(0) = 8.10eV ±1.0%

(J. Goity, et al. Phys. Rev. D66:076014, 2002)

• Γ(0) = 8.06eV ±1.0%

(B. Ananthanarayan et al. JHEP 05:052, 2002)

Calculations in NNLO SU(2) ChPT:

• Γ(0) = 8.09eV ±1.3%

(K. Kampf et al. Phys. Rev. D79:076005, 2009)

0→

• Calculations in QCD sum rule:
• Γ(0) = 7.93eV ± 1.5%

(B.L. Ioffe, et al. Phys. Lett. B647, p. 389, 2007)

• Precision measurements of (0→) at the percent levelwill provide

a stringent test of a fundamental prediction of QCD.

ρ,ω

Primakoff Method

12C target

Primakoff

Nucl. Coherent

Nucl. Incoh.

Interference

Challenge: Extract the Primakoff amplitude

Requirement:

• Photon flux
• Beam energy
• 0production Angular resolution
Pri PrimEx-I (2004)
• JLab Hall B high resolution, high

intensity photon tagging facility

• New pair spectrometer for

photon flux control at high

beam intensities

1% accuracy has been achieved

• New high resolution hybrid

multi-channel calorimeter (HyCal)

PrimEx Hybrid Calorimeter - HyCal
• 1152 PbWO4 crystal detectors
• 576 Pb-glass Cherenkov detectors

HYCAL

only

Kinematical

constraint

x = 1.3 mm

0 Event selection

We measure:

• incident photon energy: E and time
• energies of decay photons:

E1, E2 and time

• X,Y positions of decay photons

Kinematical constraints:

• Conservation of energy;
• Conservation of momentum;
• m invariant mass

PrimEx Online Event Display

Theoretical angular distributions smeared with experimental resolutions are fit to the data on two nuclear targets:

Verification of Overall Systematical Uncertainties
•  + e  +eCompton cross section measurement
• e+e-pair-production cross section measurement

Systematic uncertainties on cross sections are controlled at 1.3% level.

PrimEx-I Result (contd.)

(0) = 7.820.14(stat)0.17(syst) eV

2.8% total uncertainty

Goal for PrimEx-II
• PrimEx-I has achieved 2.8% precision (total):

(0) = 7.82 eV 1.8% (stat) 2.2% (syst.)

PrimEx-II

projected 1.4%

PrimEx-I

7.82eV2.8%

to obtain 1.4% precision

Projected uncertainties:

0.5% (stat.) 1.3% (syst.)

Improvements for PrimEx-II

1.4 % Total

1.3 % Syst.

0.5 % Stat.

• Better control of Background:
• Add timing information in HyCal (~500 chan.)
• Improve photon beam line
• Improve PID in HyCal (add horizontal veto

counters to have both x and y detectors)

• More empty target data
• Measure HyCal detection efficiency
• Double target thickness (factor of 2 gain)
• Hall B DAQ with 5 kHz rate,

(factor of 5 gain)

• Double photon beam energy interval in the trigger
Improvements in PrimEx-II Photon Beam Line

Monte Carlo Simulations

• Make the primary collimator “tapered”.
• Triple the Permanent Magnet
• Reduce the size of the central hole in Pb-shielding wall

Total relative gain:

PrimEx-I config. 100 %

suggested PrimEx-II config. 19 %

~5 times less background events

Improvement in PID

PrimEx-II Run Status
• Experiment was performed from Sep. 27 to Nov. 10 in 2010.
• Physics data collected:
• π0 production run on two nuclear targets: 28Si(0.6% statistics)

and12C(1.1% statistics).

• Good statistics for two well-known QED processes to verify the

systematic uncertainties: Compton scattering and e+e- pair

production.

PrimEx-II Analysis Status

HyCal energy calibration

Reconstructed 0 distribution vs. the number of iterations

Tagger Timing

After calibration

Before calibration

 ~ 1.5ns

 ~ 0.6ns

HyCal Timing

HyCal TDC groups scheme:

HyCal TDC spectrum:

PrimEx-II Experimental Yield (preliminary)

( E = 4.4-5.3 GeV)

Primakoff

Primakoff

12C

28Si

~8K Primakoff events

~20K Primakoff events

Other Multi- Channels in Data Set

 → 30

 → 0 + 

 = 6MeV

 = 15MeV

ʹ→ (→2) + 20

a0 → (→2) + 0

 = 10MeV

 100MeV

Summary
• The 0 lifetime is one of the few precision predictions of low energy QCD
• Percent level measurement is a stringent test of QCD.
• New generation of Primakoff experiments have been developed in Hall B

to provide high precision measurement on Γ(0)

• Systematic uncertainties on cross sections are controlled at the 1.3% level,

verified by two well-known QED processes: Compton and pair-production.

• PrimEx-I result (2.8% total uncertainty):

Γ(0)  7.82  0.14(stat.)  0.17(syst.) eV

Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 162302 (2011)

• PrimEx-II (fall 2010): high statistical data set has been collected on two nuclear targets, 12C and 28Si.
• PrimEx-II analysis is in progress. The 0 lifetime at level of 1.4% precision is expected.

This project is supported by:

• NSF MRI (PHY-0079840)
• Jlab under DOE contract (DE-AC05-84ER40150)

Thank You!

Measurement of Γ(→) in Hall D at 12 GeV
• Use GlueX standard setup for this measurement:

CompCal

Counting

House

75 m

• Photon beam line -incoherent tagged photons
• Pair spectrometer
• Solenoid detectors (for background rejection)
• 30 cm LH2 and LHe4 targets (~3.6% r.l.)
• Forward tracking detectors (for background rejection)
• Forward Calorimeter (FCAL) for → decay photons
• Additional CompCal detector for overall control of systematic uncertainties.

29

0 Forward Photoproduction off Complex Nuclei (theoretical models)
• Coherent Production A→0A

(with absorption)

Primakoff

Nuclear coherent

(with absorption)

0 rescattering

Theoretical Calculation (cont.)
• Two independent approaches:
• Glauber theory
• Incoherent Production A→0A´

Deviation in Γ(0) is less than 0.2%

Γ(0)Model Sensitivity

Variations in absorption

parameter sΔΓ <0.06%

Variations in energy dependence

Parameter n ΔΓ <0.04%

parameter xΔΓ <0.06%

Overall model error in Γ(0) extraction is controlled at 0.25%

Primakoff Experiments before PrimEx
• DESY (1970)
• bremsstrahlung  beam,

E=1.5 and 2.5 GeV

• Targets C, Zn, Al, Pb
• Result: (0)=(11.71.2) eV

10.%

• Cornell (1974)
• bremsstrahlung  beam

E=4 and 6 GeV

• targets: Be, Al, Cu, Ag, U
• Result: (0)=(7.920.42) eV

5.3%

• All previous experiments used:
• Untagged bremsstrahlung  beam
• Conventional Pb-glass calorimetry
Decay Length Measurements (Direct Method)
• Measure 0decay length
• 1x10-16 sec too small to measure

solution: Create energetic 0 ‘s,

L = vE/m

But, for E= 1000 GeV, Lmean 100 μm

very challenging experiment

1984 CERN experiment:

P=450 GeV proton beam

Two variable separation (5-250m) foils

Result:

(0) = 7.34eV3.1% (total)

• Major limitations of method
• unknown P0 spectrum
• needs higher energies for improvement

0→

e+e- Collider Experiment
• DORIS II @ DESY
• e+e-e+e-**e+e-0e+e-
• e+,e- scattered at small angles (not detected)
• only  detected
• Results:

Γ(0) = 7.7 ± 0.5 ± 0.5 eV ( ± 10.0%)

0→

• Not included in PDG average
• Major limitations of method
• knowledge of luminosity
• unknown q2 for **

Multi- Reconstructions from HyCal

• We observe multi- states produced in He gas close to HyCal (at distance 1 – 2 m)
• HyCal shows good invariance mass resolution even with unknown decay vertex position and particle energy

He

Luminosity Control: Pair Spectrometer
• Combination of:
• 16 KGxM dipole magnet
• 2 telescopes of 2x8

scintillating detectors

Measured in experiment:

• absolute tagging ratios:
• TAC measurements at low intensities
• relative tagging ratios:
• pair spectrometer at low and high

intensities

• Uncertainty in photon flux at

the level of 1% has been reached

• Verified by known cross

sections of QED processes

• Compton scattering
• e+e- pair production

User\'s meeting, 6/7/2011