0 lifetime from the primex experiments
Download
1 / 37

π 0 Lifetime from the PrimEx Experiments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 95 Views
  • Uploaded on

π 0 Lifetime from the PrimEx Experiments. Outline  0 and QCD symmetries PrimEx-I result PrimEx-II status Summary. Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington (for the PrimEx Collaboration). Properties of  0.  0 is the lightest hadron: m  = 135 MeV.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' π 0 Lifetime from the PrimEx Experiments' - daquan-conley


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
0 lifetime from the primex experiments

π0 Lifetime from the PrimEx Experiments

Outline

  • 0 and QCD symmetries

  • PrimEx-I result

  • PrimEx-II status

  • Summary

Liping Gan

University of North Carolina Wilmington

(for the PrimEx Collaboration)


Properties of 0
Properties of 0

  • 0 is the lightest hadron:

    m = 135 MeV

  • 0 is unstable.

    0→ γγ B.R.(0 →γγ)=(98.8±0.032)%

  • Lifetime and Radiative Decay width:

     = B.R.( 0 →γγ)/(0 →γγ)

     0.8 x 10-16 second


Spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking gives rise to 0
Spontaneous Chiral Symmetry Breaking Gives Rise to π0

In massless quark limit

Massless Goldstone Bosons

Corrections to theory:

  • Non-zero quark masses generate meson masses

  • Quark mass differences cause mixing among the mesons

    Since π0 is the lightest quark-antiquark system in nature, the corrections are small.


Axial anomaly determines 0 lifetime

k1

p

Axial Anomaly Determines π0Lifetime

  • 0→ decay proceeds primarily via the chiral anomaly in QCD.

  • The chiral anomaly prediction is exact for massless quarks:

k2

  • Γ(0)is one of the few quantities in confinement region that QCD can

    calculate precisely to higher orders!

  • Corrections to the chiral anomaly prediction:

    Calculations in NLO ChPT:

    • Γ(0) = 8.10eV ±1.0%

      (J. Goity, et al. Phys. Rev. D66:076014, 2002)

    • Γ(0) = 8.06eV ±1.0%

      (B. Ananthanarayan et al. JHEP 05:052, 2002)

      Calculations in NNLO SU(2) ChPT:

    • Γ(0) = 8.09eV ±1.3%

      (K. Kampf et al. Phys. Rev. D79:076005, 2009)

0→

  • Calculations in QCD sum rule:

    • Γ(0) = 7.93eV ± 1.5%

      (B.L. Ioffe, et al. Phys. Lett. B647, p. 389, 2007)

  • Precision measurements of (0→) at the percent levelwill provide

    a stringent test of a fundamental prediction of QCD.


Primakoff method

ρ

Primakoff Method

12C target

Primakoff

Nucl. Coherent

Nucl. Incoh.

Interference

Challenge: Extract the Primakoff amplitude

Requirement:

  • Photon flux

  • Beam energy

  • 0production Angular resolution


Pri primex i 2004
Pri PrimEx-I (2004)

  • JLab Hall B high resolution, high

    intensity photon tagging facility

  • New pair spectrometer for

    photon flux control at high

    beam intensities

    1% accuracy has been achieved

  • New high resolution hybrid

    multi-channel calorimeter (HyCal)


Primex hy brid cal orimeter hycal
PrimEx Hybrid Calorimeter - HyCal

  • 1152 PbWO4 crystal detectors

  • 576 Pb-glass Cherenkov detectors

HYCAL

only

Kinematical

constraint

x = 1.3 mm


0 event selection
0 Event selection

We measure:

  • incident photon energy: E and time

  • energies of decay photons:

    E1, E2 and time

  • X,Y positions of decay photons

Kinematical constraints:

  • Conservation of energy;

  • Conservation of momentum;

  • m invariant mass

PrimEx Online Event Display


0 event selection contd
0 Event Selection (contd.)


Fit differential cross sections to extract 0
Fit Differential Cross Sections to Extract Γ(0)

Theoretical angular distributions smeared with experimental resolutions are fit to the data on two nuclear targets:


Verification of overall systematical uncertainties
Verification of Overall Systematical Uncertainties

  •  + e  +eCompton cross section measurement

  • e+e-pair-production cross section measurement

Systematic uncertainties on cross sections are controlled at 1.3% level.



PrimEx-I Result (contd.)

(0) = 7.820.14(stat)0.17(syst) eV

2.8% total uncertainty


Goal for primex ii
Goal for PrimEx-II

  • PrimEx-I has achieved 2.8% precision (total):

    (0) = 7.82 eV 1.8% (stat) 2.2% (syst.)

PrimEx-II

projected 1.4%

PrimEx-I

7.82eV2.8%

  • Task for PrimEx-II is

    to obtain 1.4% precision

    Projected uncertainties:

    0.5% (stat.) 1.3% (syst.)



Improvements for primex ii
Improvements for PrimEx-II

1.4 % Total

1.3 % Syst.

0.5 % Stat.

  • Better control of Background:

    • Add timing information in HyCal (~500 chan.)

    • Improve photon beam line

    • Improve PID in HyCal (add horizontal veto

      counters to have both x and y detectors)

    • More empty target data

  • Measure HyCal detection efficiency

  • Double target thickness (factor of 2 gain)

  • Hall B DAQ with 5 kHz rate,

    (factor of 5 gain)

  • Double photon beam energy interval in the trigger


Improvements in primex ii photon beam line
Improvements in PrimEx-II Photon Beam Line

Monte Carlo Simulations

  • Make the primary collimator “tapered”.

  • Triple the Permanent Magnet

  • Reduce the size of the central hole in Pb-shielding wall

Total relative gain:

PrimEx-I config. 100 %

suggested PrimEx-II config. 19 %

~5 times less background events


Add timing in hycal 500 channels of tdc s in hycal
Add Timing in HyCal~500 channels of TDC’s in HYCAL


Improvement in pid
Improvement in PID

Additional horizontal veto


Primex ii run status
PrimEx-II Run Status

  • Experiment was performed from Sep. 27 to Nov. 10 in 2010.

  • Physics data collected:

    • π0 production run on two nuclear targets: 28Si(0.6% statistics)

      and12C(1.1% statistics).

    • Good statistics for two well-known QED processes to verify the

      systematic uncertainties: Compton scattering and e+e- pair

      production.


PrimEx-II Analysis Status

HyCal energy calibration

Reconstructed 0 distribution vs. the number of iterations


Tagger Timing

After calibration

Before calibration

 ~ 1.5ns

 ~ 0.6ns


HyCal Timing

HyCal TDC groups scheme:

HyCal TDC spectrum:


Preliminary 0 Reconstruction

Empty target


PrimEx-II Experimental Yield (preliminary)

( E = 4.4-5.3 GeV)

Primakoff

Primakoff

12C

28Si

~8K Primakoff events

~20K Primakoff events


Other Multi- Channels in Data Set

 → 30

 → 0 + 

 = 6MeV

 = 15MeV

ʹ→ (→2) + 20

a0 → (→2) + 0

 = 10MeV

 100MeV


Summary
Summary

  • The 0 lifetime is one of the few precision predictions of low energy QCD

    • Percent level measurement is a stringent test of QCD.

  • New generation of Primakoff experiments have been developed in Hall B

    to provide high precision measurement on Γ(0)

  • Systematic uncertainties on cross sections are controlled at the 1.3% level,

    verified by two well-known QED processes: Compton and pair-production.

  • PrimEx-I result (2.8% total uncertainty):

    Γ(0)  7.82  0.14(stat.)  0.17(syst.) eV

    Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 162302 (2011)

  • PrimEx-II (fall 2010): high statistical data set has been collected on two nuclear targets, 12C and 28Si.

  • PrimEx-II analysis is in progress. The 0 lifetime at level of 1.4% precision is expected.


This project is supported by:

  • NSF MRI (PHY-0079840)

  • Jlab under DOE contract (DE-AC05-84ER40150)

    Thank You!


Measurement of in hall d at 12 gev
Measurement of Γ(→) in Hall D at 12 GeV

  • Use GlueX standard setup for this measurement:

CompCal

Counting

House

75 m

  • Photon beam line -incoherent tagged photons

  • Pair spectrometer

  • Solenoid detectors (for background rejection)

  • 30 cm LH2 and LHe4 targets (~3.6% r.l.)

  • Forward tracking detectors (for background rejection)

  • Forward Calorimeter (FCAL) for → decay photons

  • Additional CompCal detector for overall control of systematic uncertainties.

29


0 forward photoproduction off complex nuclei theoretical models
0 Forward Photoproduction off Complex Nuclei (theoretical models)

  • Coherent Production A→0A

Leading order processes:

(with absorption)

Primakoff

Nuclear coherent

Next-to-leading order:

(with absorption)

0 rescattering

Photon shadowing


Theoretical calculation cont
Theoretical Calculation (cont.)

  • Two independent approaches:

    • Glauber theory

    • Cascade Model (Monte Carlo)

  • Incoherent Production A→0A´

Deviation in Γ(0) is less than 0.2%


0 model sensitivity
Γ(0)Model Sensitivity

Variations in absorption

parameter sΔΓ <0.06%

Variations in energy dependence

Parameter n ΔΓ <0.04%

Variations in shadowing

parameter xΔΓ <0.06%

Overall model error in Γ(0) extraction is controlled at 0.25%


Primakoff experiments before primex
Primakoff Experiments before PrimEx

  • DESY (1970)

    • bremsstrahlung  beam,

      E=1.5 and 2.5 GeV

    • Targets C, Zn, Al, Pb

    • Result: (0)=(11.71.2) eV

      10.%

  • Cornell (1974)

    • bremsstrahlung  beam

      E=4 and 6 GeV

    • targets: Be, Al, Cu, Ag, U

    • Result: (0)=(7.920.42) eV

      5.3%

  • All previous experiments used:

    • Untagged bremsstrahlung  beam

    • Conventional Pb-glass calorimetry


Decay length measurements direct method
Decay Length Measurements (Direct Method)

  • Measure 0decay length

  • 1x10-16 sec too small to measure

solution: Create energetic 0 ‘s,

L = vE/m

But, for E= 1000 GeV, Lmean 100 μm

very challenging experiment

1984 CERN experiment:

P=450 GeV proton beam

Two variable separation (5-250m) foils

Result:

(0) = 7.34eV3.1% (total)

  • Major limitations of method

  • unknown P0 spectrum

  • needs higher energies for improvement

0→


E e collider experiment
e+e- Collider Experiment

  • DORIS II @ DESY

  • e+e-e+e-**e+e-0e+e-

  • e+,e- scattered at small angles (not detected)

  • only  detected

  • Results:

    Γ(0) = 7.7 ± 0.5 ± 0.5 eV ( ± 10.0%)

0→

  • Not included in PDG average

  • Major limitations of method

  • knowledge of luminosity

  • unknown q2 for **


Multi- Reconstructions from HyCal

  • We observe multi- states produced in He gas close to HyCal (at distance 1 – 2 m)

  • HyCal shows good invariance mass resolution even with unknown decay vertex position and particle energy

He


Luminosity control pair spectrometer
Luminosity Control: Pair Spectrometer

  • Combination of:

  • 16 KGxM dipole magnet

  • 2 telescopes of 2x8

    scintillating detectors

Measured in experiment:

  • absolute tagging ratios:

    • TAC measurements at low intensities

  • relative tagging ratios:

    • pair spectrometer at low and high

      intensities

  • Uncertainty in photon flux at

    the level of 1% has been reached

  • Verified by known cross

    sections of QED processes

    • Compton scattering

    • e+e- pair production

User's meeting, 6/7/2011


ad