Discussion topics not exhaustive
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 2

Discussion topics (not exhaustive!) PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 49 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Discussion topics (not exhaustive!). Hadron test beam FNAL Meson Test Beam Facility ( MTBF ) most likely Thought to be only viable hadron beam line in 2005 Any experience within UK of using this beam area? Need to write “ proposal/MoU ” for beam time Not too detailed but need to make a case

Download Presentation

Discussion topics (not exhaustive!)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Discussion topics not exhaustive

Discussion topics (not exhaustive!)

Hadron test beam

  • FNAL Meson Test Beam Facility (MTBF) most likely

    • Thought to be only viable hadron beam line in 2005

    • Any experience within UK of using this beam area?

  • Need to write “proposal/MoU” for beam time

    • Not too detailed but need to make a case

    • Will clarify our own aims!

  • What we are trying to achieve and some justification for scope

    • What range of energies, incident angles, particle types, beam positions, etc? (Have been assuming ~102)

    • What numbers of events at each of these? (Have been assuming ~106)

  • Needs some MC studies

    • Clearly UK should contribute; when would we be in a position to do this?

    • What sort of sample sizes would be needed? Can we produce them?

Paul Dauncey


Discussion topics cont

Discussion topics (cont)

Preparations for analysis

  • Raw data converted to analysis data (pedestal subtraction, threshold, calibration gain corrections)

    • How are these constants determined?

    • Do we need to do MC studies?

  • Need MC and data in the same analysis (and raw?) format

    • What format; LCIO? ROOT?

    • Who will write required software?

  • Need MC production for large samples

    • Also needed for FNAL proposal?

    • Where will these be produced?

  • Where will we store data and MC

    • DESY offered originally; also want data at RAL?

    • Data ~few 100 Gbytes analysis, ~few TBytes raw; MC ~same?

Paul Dauncey


  • Login