1 / 9

Issues emerging from AWP&B 2009-10 By Satish Girotra TSG, Ed.CIL

Annexure-VII. Issues emerging from AWP&B 2009-10 By Satish Girotra TSG, Ed.CIL. Issues in PAB 2009-10 Preparation of annual plan:- The plan is to be prepared in accordance with MHRD guideline, Appraisal manual, Financial manual, Framework of SSA and other guidelines issued from time to time.

danielle-mcdonald
Download Presentation

Issues emerging from AWP&B 2009-10 By Satish Girotra TSG, Ed.CIL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Annexure-VII Issues emerging from AWP&B 2009-10 By Satish Girotra TSG, Ed.CIL

  2. Issues in PAB 2009-10 Preparation of annual plan:- The plan is to be prepared in accordance with MHRD guideline, Appraisal manual, Financial manual, Framework of SSA and other guidelines issued from time to time. The Plan must contain Qpr, Mpr, for ending Dec. end tentative progress ending March, along with financial and physical spillover. The unit cost if revised must be notified by State Govt. based on State scheduled of rates. The financial spillover in the plan, in the Qpr ending March should reconcile. The physical target should also reconcile with the PAB targets.

  3. Prioritization of components:- The proposal of the State must have lists of the components in district plan for quick implementation • Spillover:- in case of some States there have been huge physical and financial spillover along with larger number of components in progress and yet to start on 31.03.09. The spillover can be reduced by appropriate implementation duly planned immediately after the approval of PAB targets. Concern: in couple of States there is no financial spillover although physical spillover

  4. was shown. It was transpired that funds were parked with the district office. • Management Structure: - The States with adequate manpower are doing far better in producing quantity and quality. For proper implementation of the school infrastructure, adequate technical manpower at State ,district and block level is necessary. • Commitment made in PAB:- The States have been making unrealistic commitment for completion of components before the PAB which are not fulfilled. The SPE may advise the Secretary Education and SPD to

  5. make realistic commitment which can be fulfilled. • Infrastructure gaps:- The analysis of DISE being worked out by some States do not account for the targets approved by PAB. • Rationalization of Expenditure with completion rate:- The National average on 31st March 2009 shows 90% expenditure with 85% completion rate. However in certain States, the completion rate is far below than the %age expenditure which shows that funds are parked with the districts /VECs.

  6. Planning PS and UPS: - The completion rate in case of these components are far below than the National completion rate of other components. The low completion rate is mainly because of non availability of land in most of the States. Before planning PS and UPS building realistic assessment for availability of land is made. • Convergence: - There have been substantial gaps which are to be saturated during the project period. The gaps in DWS is 13%, common toilets 37%, Girls toilets 50% at National level. The situation is better at UPS

  7. but is adverse in PS. • Un-propotionate distribution of school infrastructure: - There have been instances where a school with 30 children is already having 3 classrooms and fourth one was under construction, where as a school having 540 children was having 4 classrooms and 5th one was under construction. The priority has to be given to the schools in accordance with SSA norms. • Third party evaluation: - For quality assurance for civil works, TPE is necessary and its should

  8. start right from the beginning of the financial year immediately after the approval of PAB minutes. The TPE should continue through out the years and lesson learnt are shared with each other and other States. The visit to the construction sight by TPE should not be less than 4 times during construction.

  9. Thanks

More Related