The impact of social networking on resnet users
Download
1 / 43

The Impact of Social Networking on ResNet Users - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 606 Views
  • Uploaded on

The Impact of Social Networking on ResNet Users. Kevin Guidry IT Fellow at Sewanee, The University of the South Member, ResNet Applied Research Group. All original content in this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Introductions. Who am I?

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The Impact of Social Networking on ResNet Users ' - daniel_millan


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
The impact of social networking on resnet users l.jpg

The Impact of Social Networking on ResNet Users

Kevin Guidry

IT Fellow at Sewanee, The University of the South

Member, ResNet Applied Research Group

All original content in this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License


Introductions l.jpg
Introductions

  • Who am I?

  • Who are you?


Disclaimers l.jpg
Disclaimers

  • I don’t know it all

  • No one knows it all

  • We’re going to play loose and fast with some of the language


Outline l.jpg
Outline

  • Foundation and generalities

  • Facebook

  • Practical implications and practices




Staggering statistics levy 2007 l.jpg
Staggering StatisticsLevy (2007)

  • MySpace:

    • More than 66 million users visit each month

    • 12 percent of all time on Internet spent there

  • Facebook

    • 23 million users visit each month

    • More than 2 million users joined in April (150,000 a day)

  • Compare with countries of the world


What is a social networking service sns l.jpg
What is a Social Networking Service (SNS)?

Are these SNSs?

  • Blackboard

  • Digg

  • Facebook

  • MySpace

  • Second Life

  • Slashdot

  • Wikipedia

  • World of Warcraft



How some researchers define sns l.jpg
How some researchers define SNS

UNC Social Software Symposium

  • December 8-9, 2006, Chapel Hill NC

  • 37 attendees

  • Their definitions of SNS


How some researchers define sns11 l.jpg
How some researchers define SNS

danah boyd (2007a):

“These three features - profiles, Friends lists, and comments* - comprise the primary structure of all social network sites, although individual sites provide additional features for further engagement. While SNSes allow visitors to wander from Friend to Friend and communicate with anyone who has a visible profile, the primary use pattern is driven by pre-existing friend groups. People join the sites with their friends and use the different messaging tools to hang out, share cultural artifacts and ideas, and communicate with one another.”

* - emphasis added


Key properties of sns boyd in press l.jpg
Key properties of SNS(boyd, in press)

  • Persistence: Unlike the ephemeral quality of speech in unmediated publics, networked communications are recorded for posterity. This enables asynchronous communication but it also extends the period of existence of any speech act.

  • Searchability: Because expressions are recorded and identity is established through text, search and discovery tools help people find like minds. While people cannot currently acquire the geographical coordinates of any person in unmediated spaces, finding one’s digital body online is just a matter of keystrokes.

  • Replicability: Hearsay can be deflected as misinterpretation, but networked public expressions can be copied from one place to another verbatim such that there is no way to distinguish the “original” from the “copy.”

  • Invisible audiences: While we can visually detect most people who can overhear our speech in unmediated spaces, it is virtually impossible to ascertain all those who might run across our expressions in networked publics. This is further complicated by the other three properties, since our expression may be heard at a different time and place from when and where we originally spoke.


Key properties of sns l.jpg
Key properties of SNS

  • Persistence

  • Searchability

  • Replicability

  • Invisible audiences


Why youths use sns l.jpg
Why Youths use SNS

To create a

“digital publics”:

  • Socialization

  • Identity development


Internet disinhibition suler 2004 l.jpg
Internet DisinhibitionSuler (2004)

  • Dissociative anonymity

  • Invisibility

  • Asynchronicity

  • Solipsistic introjection

  • Dissociative imagination

  • Minimization of authority


It s a dog eat dog world l.jpg
It’s a dog-eat-dog world

  • http://dogster.com/

  • http://www.uniteddogs.com/

  • http://vivapets.com/myhome.php

  • http://www.petzzy.com/

  • http://www.doggysnaps.com/

  • http://www.sniflabs.com/



Caveats l.jpg
Caveats

  • I am not an expert in this application/tool

  • Research takes time

  • Significant gaps in the research

  • Facebook continues to change


Recent facebook changes l.jpg
“Recent” Facebook Changes

  • February 2006 – High school users allowed

  • September 2006 – All users allowed

  • May 2007 – API expanded/changed

    “More than 40,000 developers have requested to be part of the project, around 1,500 applications have been produced so far, and some of the most popular went from zero to 850,000 users in three days.”


Basic stats as of may 2007 cashmore 2007 l.jpg
Basic stats (as of May 2007)Cashmore (2007)

  • General Growth• More than 24 million active users• More than 100,000 new registrations per day since Jan. 2007• An average of 3 percent weekly growth since Jan. 2007• Active users have doubled since Facebook expanded registration in Sept. 2006User Demographics• Over 47,000 regional, work-related, collegiate, and high school networks• More than half of Facebook users are outside of college• The fastest growing demographic is those 25 years old and older• Maintain 85 percent market share of 4-year U.S. universities

  • User Engagement• Sixth-most trafficked site in the United States*• More than 40 billion page views per month in May 2007• More than half of active users return daily• People spend an average of 20 minutes on the site daily*

  • Applications• No. 1 photo sharing application on the web*• Photo application draws more than twice as much traffic as the next three sites combined*• More than 1.8 billion photos on the site• More than 6 million active user groups on the site

  • International Growth• Canada has the most users outside of the United States, with more than 2.5 million active users• The U.K. is the third largest country with more than 1.4 million active users• Remaining Top 10 countries in order of active users (outside of the U.S., Canada and UK): Norway,Australia, South Africa, Lebanon, Egypt, Sweden and India

    *Source: comScore Media Metrix


How many students use facebook l.jpg
How many students use Facebook?

  • ECAR (2006): “More than 70 percent use social networking sites such as MySpace and Facebook, and of those 65.9 percent do so several times a week or more.”

  • Ellison, Steinfield, & Lampe (2006): 94% of MSU freshmen

  • Stutzman (2006): In week 1, 85% of UNC freshmen; by week 16, 94%

  • Vanden Boogart (2006): 94.4% of participants at 4 different institutions


Frequency of facebook daily use vanden boogart 2006 l.jpg
Frequency of Facebook Daily UseVanden Boogart (2006)

N Percent

0 - 30 minutes 1539 53.9%

30 minutes - 1 hour 837 29.3%

1 hour - 2 hours 362 12.7%

2 hours - 3 hours 89 3.1%

more than 3 hours 30 1.1%

Total 2857 100.0%


Is anyone not using facebook l.jpg
Is anyone not using Facebook?

  • Ellison, Steinfield, & Lampe (2006): “Neither gender, ethnicity, nor income appeared to relate to propensity to join Facebook. Older students, and those who have been at school longer are significantly less likely to be on Facebook, probably reflecting an effect of the recency which with the MSU Facebook community began.”


How many friends do they have l.jpg
How many “friends” do they have?

  • Ellison, Steinfield, & Lampe (2006): “Students report…between 150 and 200 friends on the system.”

  • Vanden Boogart (2006): “The average respondent had 145 friends at their institution and 127 friends at other institutions.”

  • Golder, Wilkinson, & Huberman (2006): “Of the 4.2 million users in our dataset, we found a median of 144 friends and mean of 179.53 friends per user.”


Dunbar s number 150 l.jpg
Dunbar's number = 150

Dunbar (2002): “The cognitive limit to the number of individuals with whom any one person can maintain stable relationships.”



What are they doing on facebook27 l.jpg
What are they doing on Facebook?

Vanden Boogart (2006): “The highest area for use on Facebook is staying connected to high school friends. One would expect more people using Facebook to connect to college peers; however a very small percentage (21.1%) are using it for this purpose.”


Why do they use facebook l.jpg
Why do they use Facebook?

Bumgarner (2006):

  • Gossip

  • Directory

  • Diversion

  • Voyeurism and exhibitionism


Privacy expectations awareness l.jpg
Privacy expectations & awareness

  • Acquisti & Gross (2006): “Most of privacy concerned undergraduates still join the network”

  • Govani & Pashley (2005): “Facebook users generally feel comfortable sharing their personal information in a campus environment. [Survey] participants said that they ‘had nothing to hide’ and ‘they don’t really care if other people see their information.’”

  • Jones & Soltren (2005): “Women definitely self-censor their Facebook data more than men do.”


Prolific bad photos l.jpg
Prolific “bad” photos?

  • Watson, Smith, & Driver (2006): “The recent media reports indicating student users of Facebook routinely post questionable photos on their sites…appear to be largely unfounded based on the evidence elicited from this research study.”

  • Results closely replicated by Saunders, Jamieson, & Hale (2007)



When are students in front of their computers l.jpg
When are students in front of their computers?

  • Rhythms of social interaction time/day data on pages 8 & 9


How do we get started l.jpg
How do we get started?

  • NCSU Facebook Phenomenon 19:27 – 21:30


Digital divide l.jpg
Digital Divide

Leichtman Research Group, Inc. (2007):

  • 53% of all US households have high-speed Internet access.

  • High-speed services now account for about 72% of all home Internet subscriptions – compared to 60% last year.

  • “While broadband subscriptions continued to increase across the country in the past year, broadband penetration remains strongly correlated with household income.”

    • 68% of all households with annual incomes over $50,000 subscribe to high-speed access

    • 39% of all households with annual incomes under $50,000 subscribe to high-speed access

  • 81% of all US households have at least one computer but only 56% of those with annual household incomes under $30,000 have a computer at home

  • 45% of households with annual incomes below $30,000 subscribe to an Internet service at home – compared to 92% of households with annual incomes above $75,000

  • 7% of all Internet subscribers say that high-speed access is not available in their area


Participatory divide l.jpg
Participatory Divide

Boyd (in press): “Those who only access their [MySpace] accounts in schools use it primarily as an asynchronous communication tool, while those with continuous nighttime access at home spend more time surfing the network, modifying their profile, collecting friends, and talking to strangers. When it comes to social network sites, there appears to be a far greater participatory divide than an access divide.”



Nyu new student orientation l.jpg
NYU New Student Orientation staff)?

  • Undergraduate Orientation Leader application statement:

    “I understand that, as a UOL, I will be expected to serve as a role model and be conscious of how I present myself in all forums, including electronic ones, such as Facebook and Myspace [sic]….Furthermore, though any information I have available in an on-line community will not be formally researched as a part of the staff selection process, I understand that members of the selection staff may have accounts and unintentionally come across my on-line personal profile.”


Nyu new student orientation38 l.jpg
NYU New Student Orientation staff)?

  • Facebook-related exercises during group interviews

  • Statement on Orientation Leader Contract:

    “I will be conscious of how I represent myself in all forums, including electronic ones, such as Facebook or Myspace [sic].”


Institutional monitoring l.jpg
Institutional monitoring? staff)?

Steinbeck & Deavers (2007):

  • Is the college monitoring its students’ online activities regularly?

  • If the institution monitors this activity, why has it chosen to do so?

  • Has the college informed its students of its policy toward monitoring?


Facebook platform l.jpg
Facebook Platform staff)?

  • Official website: http://developers.facebook.com/

  • Example application: UIUC Library Search


It s a little cheesy but l.jpg
It’s a little “cheesy” but... staff)?

  • The Internet Has A Face


References l.jpg
References staff)?

  • Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the facebook. Cambridge, England: 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

  • boyd, d. (2007a). Social network sites: public, private, or what? The Knowledge Tree(13). Retreived June 11, 2007, from http://kt.flexiblelearning.net.au/tkt2007/?page_id=28

  • boyd, d. (in press). Why youth (heart) social network sites: the role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Identity Volume New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://www.danah.org/papers/WhyYouthHeart.pdf

  • Cashmore, P.. (2007, May 24). Facebook F8 Live. Mashable. Retrieved June 19, 2007, from http://mashable.com/2007/05/24/facebook-f8-live/

  • Dunbar, R.I.M. (1992) Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution 22: 469-493.

  • Govani, T., & Pashley, H. (2005). Student awareness of the privacy implications when using facebook. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University. [Student Poster].

  • Jones, H., & Soltren, J. H. (2005). Facebook: threats to privacy. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [Unpublished student paper].


References43 l.jpg
References staff)?

  • Leichtman Research Group, Inc. (2007). Over half of u.s. households subscribe to broadband internet. Durham, NC: Leichtman Research Group, Inc. [Press release]. Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://www.leichtmanresearch.com/press/060707release.html

  • Levy, S. (2007, May 28). Is Facebook catching up with MySpace? Newsweek. Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18754283/site/newsweek/

  • McCarthy, Caroline (2007, June 18). FaceBook platform attracts 1,000 developers a day. CNET News.com. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/FaceBook-platform-attracts-1-000-developers-a-day/0,130061733,339278661,00.htm

  • Steinbeck, S. E. & Deavers, L. M. (2007, April 3). The Brave New World of MySpace and Facebook. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved June 13, 2007, from http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2007/04/03/steinbach

  • Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior,7(3).

  • Vanden Boogart, M. R. (2006). Uncovering the social impacts of facebook on a college campus. Unpublished Master of Science Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.

  • Watson, S. W., Smith, Z., & Driver, J. (2006). Alcohol, sex and illegal activities: an analysis of selected facebook central photos in fifty states. [ERIC Document ED493049].


ad