Model for diversity in clinical trials academic perspective
Download
1 / 40

Model for Diversity in Clinical Trials: Academic Perspective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 342 Views
  • Uploaded on

Model for Diversity in Clinical Trials: Academic Perspective. Shiriki Kumanyika, PhD, MPH Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Depts of Biostatistics and Epidemiology and Pediatrics (Nutrition) Graduate Program in Public Health Studies

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Model for Diversity in Clinical Trials: Academic Perspective' - daniel_millan


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Model for diversity in clinical trials academic perspective l.jpg

Model for Diversity in Clinical Trials: Academic Perspective

Shiriki Kumanyika, PhD, MPH

Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics

Depts of Biostatistics and Epidemiology and Pediatrics (Nutrition)

Graduate Program in Public Health Studies

NCMHD EXPORT Center for Inner City Health


Overview l.jpg
Overview

  • Review and Rationale of Policy

  • Recent Up-Dates & Implications

  • Implementation


Nih policy on inclusion of women minorities in clinical research l.jpg
NIH Policy on Inclusion of Women & Minorities in Clinical Research

  • Why does NIH have this policy?

    • Mandated by Congress, 1993 PL 103-43

    • Ethical principal of justice and importance of balancing research burdens and benefits

    • Amended 2001

http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/women_min.htm


Nih revitalization act public law pl 103 43 l.jpg
NIH Revitalization Act ResearchPublic Law PL 103-43

  • Women and Minorities must be included in all clinical research studies

  • Women and Minorities must be included in Phase III clinical trials in numbers adequate for valid analysis

  • Cost is NOT allowed as an acceptable reason for exclusion

  • NIH to support outreach efforts to recruit and retain women, minorities, and their subpopulations in clinical studies


Slide5 l.jpg

WOMEN AND HEALTH RESEARCH: ETHICAL ResearchANDLEGALISSUESOFINCLUDINGWOMENINCLINICALSTUDIES

VOLUME 1 (Report)

Anna C. Mastroianni, Ruth Faden, and Daniel Federman, Editors

National Academy of Sciences, 1994

Volume 2

(Workshop and Commissioned Papers)


Conflict of two policy positions l.jpg
Conflict of two policy positions Research

  • Protectionism

    • Human subjects abuses of the 1950’s and 1960’s

    • Adverse outcomes in children of women who had taken certain drugs

    • Mid-70’s regulations to protect against fetal injury


Conflict of two policy positions7 l.jpg
Conflict of two policy positions Research

  • Access

    • 1980’s challenges from women’s health groups and AIDS activists that policies were overprotective and overly exclusive

    • 1990 GAO report--failure to implement 1986 policy on inclusion of women in clinical studies

    • NIH Revitalization act of 1993 included provision on inclusion of women and members of diverse racial and ethnic groups


Paradigm shift reframing of issues l.jpg
Paradigm Shift ResearchReframing of Issues

  • Exclusion to Inclusion

  • Justice—equal distribution of the benefits of biomedical research

  • Scientific Issues

  • Social and Ethical Issues

  • Legal Considerations

  • Practical Issues


Recommendations l.jpg
Recommendations Research

  • The committee supports the efforts of NIH to establish a registry of clinical studies and recommends that such a registry include information on the participation of women and men and on the racial and ethnic composition of participants in such studies, as well as the research questions addressed, that such information be reasonably accessible to investigators and the public, and that the scope of the studies included in the registry be comprehensive.


Recommendations10 l.jpg
Recommendations Research

  • The committee recommends that NIH work with other federal agencies and departments that conduct clinical research to ensure reporting of all federally funded clinical studies.

  • The committee further recommends that representatives of NIH initiate discussions with FDA concerning the feasibility of including privately funded studies in such a registry.


Recommendations11 l.jpg
Recommendations Research

  • …ensure that scientific advances in medicine and public health fairly benefit all people, regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, or age.

  • …justice may require a policy of preferential treatment toward these specific areas in order to remedy a past injustice and to avoid perpetuating that injustice.

  • Volunteers …should be offered the opportunity to participate without regard to gender, race, ethnicity, or age. Women and men should be enrolled …in a manner that ensures that research yields scientifically generalizable results applicable to both genders.


Scientific considerations l.jpg
Scientific Considerations Research

  • When do responses of men and women differ significantly?

    • Biological

    • Psychosocial

  • Trade-offs between heterogeneity and homogeneity in clinical trials

  • Argument for exclusion is actually an argument for inclusion


Recommendations13 l.jpg
Recommendations Research

  • Gender differences in drug response should be studied

  • Investigators should be alert to possible gender issues and design studies accordingly

  • Investigators should avoid exclusions based on demographic characteristics

  • Investigators should demonstrate reasonable review of relevant evidence


Social and ethical considerations l.jpg
Social and Ethical Considerations Research

  • Unconscious biases

    • influence topics selected

    • how topics are operationalized

    • study design

    • data collection method

    • participants chosen for inclusion

  • Male bias and male norm


Recommendations15 l.jpg
Recommendations Research

  • Educational efforts to increase awareness of gender bias…

  • Continued efforts to encourage women of all racial and ethnic groups to become scientific researchers and assume positions of authority within the scientific hierarchy


Slide16 l.jpg


Slide17 l.jpg

Committee on Understanding the Biology of Sex and Gender Differences

Institute of Medicine

National Academy of Sciences, 2001


Health implications of sex differences l.jpg
Health implications of sex differences Differences

  • Etiology

  • Diagnosis

  • Treatment


Questions l.jpg
QUESTIONS Differences

  • What do we know, and what can we learn about biological sex differences?

  • Do sex differences matter to health?

  • In what ways does sex affect health, especially beyond the reproductive system?

  • How can the study of sex improve women’s health?

Institute of Medicine


Diseases conditions with greater impact on women l.jpg

Migraine with aura Differences

Carpal tunnel syndrome

Raynaud’s disease

Esophagitis

Gallbladder disease

Irritable bowel syndrome

Interstitial cystitis

Fibromyalgia

Multiple sclerosis

Rhematoid arthritis

Lupus erythematosus

Autoimmune diseases

Obesity

Diseases/Conditions with greater impact on women


Slide21 l.jpg

January 2003 Differences

orwh.od.nih.gov/pubs/SMR_Final.pdf


Updates to inclusion policy l.jpg
Updates to Inclusion Policy Differences

  • NIH Definition of Clinical Research

  • New OMB Standards for Data on Ethnicity and Race

  • Further Clarification about Phase III Clinical Trials


Nih definition of clinical research l.jpg
NIH Definition of Clinical Research Differences

  • Patient-oriented research.

    Research conducted with human subjects … for which an investigator (or colleague) directly interacts with human subjects.

    Excluded from this definition are in vitro studies that utilize human tissues that cannot be linked to a living individual. Patient-oriented research includes: (a) mechanisms of human disease, (b) therapeutic interventions, (c) clinical trials, and (d) development of new technologies;


Nih definition of clinical research continued l.jpg
NIH Definition of Clinical Research ( Differencescontinued)

(2)  Epidemiologic and behavioral studies;

(3)  Outcomes research and health services

research.


Instructions in phs 398 l.jpg
Instructions in PHS 398 Differences

  • Best source of information for investigators

  • http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html


Instructions in phs 39826 l.jpg
Instructions in PHS 398 Differences

  • Section E: Human Subjects Research

    • Inclusion of Women

    • Inclusion of Minorities

  • Failure to include = Return Application Prior to Review


Instructions in phs 39827 l.jpg
Instructions in PHS 398 Differences

  • Inclusion of Women and Minorities Sections must include:

    • Subject Selection Criteria & Rationale

    • Rationale for Any Exclusions

    • Enrollment dates (start and end)

    • Outreach Plans for Recruitment

    • Proposed Composition Using New Tables


Implementation l.jpg
Implementation Differences

  • Study question

  • Study design and sample size

    • Diversity only (compliance)

    • Referenced to affected population (science)

    • Subgroup differences (science)

    • Ethnic minority group only?

    • Exclusion criteria


Exclusion criteria bias and relevance l.jpg
Exclusion Criteria: Bias and Relevance Differences

  • Goal

    • Internal validity and relevance

  • Potential for enrollment

    • Willing participants

  • Potential for adherence

    • ‘good’ participants

    • predictable result


Exclusion criteria bias and relevance 2 l.jpg
Exclusion Criteria: Bias and Relevance (2) Differences

  • e.g., high body mass index

    • Relevance

    • Feasibility

  • Comorbidities


Eligibility issues l.jpg
Eligibility Issues Differences

  • Assessed 235 consecutively diagnosed patients at the Howard University Hospital and Cancer Center (165 women and 70 men) for eligible for cancer treatment trials

  • 8% were eligible; 60% of those eligible enrolled (n=12)

  • Disease characteristics excluded patients from the prostate and breast trials

Adams-Campbell et al, J Clin Ocol 2004;22:730-734


Reaching and retaining the population l.jpg
Reaching and retaining the population Differences

  • Reasons for participation

  • Feasibility of participation

  • Outreach

  • Distrust

  • Respect/relationships

  • Literacy

  • Socioeconomic Status

  • Demographic differences in subgroups recruited and retained


Perceived participant benefits l.jpg
Perceived participant benefits Differences

  • Tangible outcome of intervention and control conditions (willingness to accept randomization)

  • Otherwise unavailable or inaccessible services

  • Curiosity or desire for knowledge

  • Altruism

  • Group interactions

  • Relationship with counselor or case manager

  • Study incentives


Recruitment l.jpg
Recruitment Differences

Annual Review of Public Health 2006;27:1-28


Findings l.jpg
Findings Differences

  • Mass mailing may work for middle and higher SES African Americans

  • Personal contact may be critical for lower SES, obese populations

  • Population based sampling will not yield sufficient numbers of minority participants for subgroup analyses

  • Reactive or passive strategies work best when eligibility is broad; proactive approaches are needed when eligibility is rare


Findings36 l.jpg
Findings Differences

  • Eligibility constraints may limit recruitment

  • Community involvement may be more important for retention than for recruitment of African Americans and Latinos

  • Effectiveness of cultural adaptations, including ethnic matches of staff, is unclear

  • Community ties may be more important than ethnicity of recruiters


Recommendations38 l.jpg
Recommendations Differences

  • Subject compensation for burden

  • Cultural/linguistic differences

  • Large geographical areas

  • Compensate recruiter burden

  • Competitive salaries for recruiters

  • Recognize need for recruiters’ community engagement

  • Value staff; involve in leadership

  • Involve recruiters in study design

  • Recognize ‘fall out’ from pressure on faculty


Determinants of retention l.jpg
Determinants of Retention Differences

  • Type of benefit

  • Participation requirements

  • Logistics

  • Initial selectivity

    • Strict inclusion hurdles yield a more narrow group of participants who may be easier to retain

  • Retention activities


Summary l.jpg
Summary Differences

  • Current guidelines reflect major paradigm shift

  • NIH hard line on implementation

  • Some scientific issues are now incorporated into compliance

  • Creates cost and logistical issues

  • Effort and resources needed for recruitment and retention may be underestimated


ad