Advancing excellence in health care
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 55

Advancing Excellence in Health Care PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 53 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Advancing Excellence in Health Care. Carolyn M. Clancy, MD Director January 21, 2005. Case Presentation - 1. Paul, a 54 yo patient with diabetes and hypertension visits a primary care clinician for abdominal pain of 2-3 days duration.

Download Presentation

Advancing Excellence in Health Care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Advancing excellence in health care

Advancing Excellence in Health Care

Carolyn M. Clancy, MD

Director

January 21, 2005


Case presentation 1

Case Presentation - 1

  • Paul, a 54 yo patient with diabetes and hypertension visits a primary care clinician for abdominal pain of 2-3 days duration.

  • Prior to his visit, he and his pc team leader have reviewed his symptoms and history by e-mail, and have examined possible causes by going to the PC Navigator, a system that has been developed to improve diagnosis and management of patients with undifferentiated symptoms.


Case presentation 2

Case Presentation - 2

  • Paul’s pc team has also reviewed Paul’s recent entries to the jointly held electronic medical record.

  • A diabetic for 10 years, Paul manages his condition with diet and exercise, after several bumpy years on insulin. His self-management is supplemented by e-mail consultations prn.


Case presentation 3

Case Presentation - 3

  • When Paul and his clinician meet -- at his convenience -- they discuss his options and agree on a diagnostic test, after reviewing possible outcomes of the test and options. The test is scheduled for that day.

  • Before leaving the practice, Paul leads a group visit at which there are several medical students -- required to attend to learn from patients about chronic illness management.


Case presentation 4

Case Presentation - 4

  • The patients in the group visit provide feedback to the students about how they can enhance patients’ skills in self management.

  • Paul then gets his diagnostic test, and before the end of the day his primary care clinician has e-mailed the results and suggested next steps.


Overview

Overview

  • About AHRQ: The Evidence Agency

  • Health Care 2005: Current Context

  • Recent Findings and Directions

  • Future Challenges


Mission statement ahrq

Mission Statement: AHRQ

The mission of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality is to improve the quality, safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of health care for all Americans.


Ahrq research focus how it differs

AHRQ RESEARCH FOCUS:HOW IT DIFFERS

  • Patient-centered, not disease-specific

  • Dual Focus -- Services + Delivery Systems Effectiveness research focuses on actual daily practice, not ideal situations (“efficacy”)

  • AHRQ mission includes production and use of evidence-based information


Ten roles of government in health care quality

Purchase health care

Provide health care

Assure access for vulnerable populations

Monitor health care quality

Regulate health care markets

Inform health care decision- makers

Support acquisition of new knowledge

Support development of health technologies and practices

Develop the health care workforce

Convene stakeholders

Ten Roles of Government in Health Care Quality


Overview1

Overview

  • About AHRQ: The Evidence Agency

  • Health Care 2005: Current Context

  • Recent Findings and Directions

  • Future Challenges


Driving forces

Driving Forces

  • Rising health care expenditures

  • Aging and increasingly diverse population

  • Consumerism

  • Biomedical advances: public and professional expectations

  • Growing influence of purchasers


Current environment

Current Environment

  • Unprecedented opportunities and innovations

  • Rising health care costs

  • Consumer and purchaser demand for value

  • Limited information on performance – and how to improve

  • Numerous initiatives to address one piece of the puzzle


Advancing excellence in health care

Public Perceptions

Percent who say they are dissatisfied with the quality of health care in this country…

Has the quality of health care in this country…

2004

2000*

Gotten worse

Stayed about the same

Don’t Know

Gotten better

* Gallup Poll conducted September 11-13, 2000 with 1,008 U.S. adults.

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation / Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality / Harvard School of Public Health National Survey on Consumers’ Experiences with Patient Safety and Quality Information, November 2004 (Conducted July 7 – September 5, 2005).


Advancing excellence in health care

Personal Experience

Did the error have serious health consequences, minor health consequences, or no health consequences at all?

Have you been personally involved in a situation where a preventable medical error was made in your own medical care or that of a family member?

Serious health consequences

Yes

No

Minor health consequences

No health consequences

Don’t Know

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation / Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality / Harvard School of Public Health National Survey on Consumers’ Experiences with Patient Safety and Quality Information, November 2004 (Conducted July 7 – September 5, 2005).


Advancing excellence in health care

Role Of IT In Reducing Medical Errors

Percent who say…

Have you or a family member ever created your own set of medical records to ensure that you and all of your health care providers have all of your medical information?

The coordination among the different health professionals that they see is a problem

Yes

They have seen a health care professional and noticed that they did not have all of their medical information

They had to wait or come back for another appointment because the provider did not have all their medical information

Don’t know

No

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation / Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality / Harvard School of Public Health National Survey on Consumers’ Experiences with Patient Safety and Quality Information, November 2004 (Conducted July 7 – September 5, 2005).


Pace of change varies across care settings

Pace of Change VariesAcross Care Settings

  • Of 98 measures with trend data, 88 can be mapped to care settings

  • Some improvement seen in all settings

  • However, change in performance varies across settings


Major opportunities for improvement

Major Opportunities for Improvement

  • 81% of Medicare pneumonia patients get blood cultures before antibiotics

  • 68% get the right antibiotics

  • 63% get their first antibiotic in a timely manner

  • Yet, only 30% get all of three recommended interventions


Advancing excellence in health care

The proportion of adults with diabetes who received all five recommended diabetic services (MEPS, 2000-2001)


Hhs recent developments

HHS: Recent Developments

  • Nursing Home Initiative

  • Home Health Care Initiative*

  • AHA-JCAHO-VHA …. Hospital reporting initiative*

  • Patient experience in hospitals*

  • Bar coding

  • IT standards (*)


Patient safety achieving a new standard for care

Patient Safety: Achieving A New Standard For Care

“Americans should be able to count on receiving health care that is safe……..This requires, first, a commitment by all stakeholders to a culture of safety, and, second, improved information systems.”

Institute of Medicine, 2003


Issues

Issues

  • Will public reporting  improvements?

  • Paying for quality – YES, but HOW??

  • Pay for quality – OR use of HIT?

  • How to align measurement and improvement efforts?


Overview2

Overview

  • About AHRQ: The Evidence Agency

  • Health Care 2005: Current Context

  • Recent Findings and Directions

  • Future Challenges


Ahrq research study identifying successful hospital quality improvements

AHRQ Research Study: Identifying Successful Hospital Quality Improvements

  • Major finding: Hospitals that were more likely to prescribe beta-blockers shared similar characteristics:

    • Solid support from their hospital administration

    • Strong physician leadership

    • Shared goals of improving medical practice

    • Effective way of monitoring progress

  • Conducted by Yale University School of Medicine

E Bradley, E Holmboe, J Mattera, et al., A Qualitative Study of

Increasing B-Blocker Use After Myocardial Infarction, Journal of

the American Medical Association, May 23, 2001


Ahrq research study sleep deprivation and safety

AHRQ Research Study: Sleep Deprivation and Safety

  • Major Finding: Serious medical errors fell significantly when medical interns’ work schedule was reduced from 30-hour-in-a-row shifts and when continuous work schedules were limited to 16 hours

36% more serious medical errors

21% more serious medication errors

CP Landrigan, JM Rothschild, J W Cronin, et al., Effective of reducing interns’ work hours on serious medical errors in intensive care units, NEJM, October 28, 2004


Ahrq research study outpatient prescription drug related injuries in elderly

AHRQ Research Study: OutpatientPrescription Drug-Related Injuries in Elderly

  • Major Finding: Outpatient Medicare patients suffered as many as 1.9 million drug-related injuries a year due to medical error or adverse drug events (ADE) not caused by errors

  • Why did preventable ADEs occur?

    • 58% prescribing medications

    • 61% monitoring medications

    • 20% patients adhering to medication instructions


Hit systems approach can make a difference

Intermountain Health Care QI effort on CVD

Results:

90% prescription rates

27% decrease in unadjusted absolute death rates

HIT + Systems approach Can Make a Difference

Proportions of patients receiving the appropriate discharge prescriptions

Lappe JM et. al., Ann Intern Med 2004;141:446-453


Hospital survey on patient safety culture

Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture

  • New tool helps hospitals and health systems evaluate employee attitudes about patient safety in their facilities or within specific units

  • Includes survey guide, survey, and feedback report template to customize reports

  • AHRQ partnership with Premier, Inc., Department of Defense, and American Hospital Association

  • www.ahrq.gov/qual/hospculture/ or e-mail to [email protected]


Key implementation activities qualitytools

Key Implementation Activities – QualityTools


National health plan learning collaborative to reduce disparities and improve quality

National Health Plan Learning Collaborative to Reduce Disparities and Improve Quality

  • Public/private partnership to reduce disparities in health care for people with diabetes and other conditions

  • Over next 3 years, collaborative will test ways to improve collection and analysis of data on race and ethnicity and match data to existing quality measures to close gap in care

  • Sponsored by nine of Nation’s largest health insurance plans, and other organizations


Overview3

Overview

  • About AHRQ: The Evidence Agency

  • Health Care 2005: Current Context

  • Recent Findings and Directions

  • Future Challenges


The future delivery system baseline assumptions

The Future Delivery System:Baseline Assumptions

  • Today’s students will encounter a dramatically different health care system

  • Basic premise of health insurance is evolving

  • System fragmentation will increase

  • Consumer-directed options will increase  increased price sensitivity and need for information

  • “Disruptive challenges” (BT, SARS, ???) a daily reality: the “new normal”


What we have learned

What We Have Learned

  • Knowing the right thing to do is NOT = doing it!

  • Improvement must be based on science

  • Patients as participants are far more effective than patients as ‘recipients’

  • Sutton’s Law: improving chronic illness care is essential

  • Safety in health care delivery is critical


Implementation of research findings debunked assumption

Implementation of Research Findings: Debunked Assumption

Question

Hypothesis

Study

Publications

Changes in practice


A flawed model

A Flawed Model

  • Receptor sites are “assumed”

  • Decisionmaking is not-linear: evidence is only part of the “solution”

  • Broad dissemination  modest effects


Improving quality and safety

Improving Quality and Safety

“We need to make the right thing

the easy thing…”

Mark Chassin, MD

October 12, 2000


If hit is such a great idea

If HIT is Such a Great Idea …..

  • Generalizability of promising findings open to question

  • Even successful hospitals use multiple vendors – and have internal interoperability challenges

  • Implementation is “challenging”

  • Physicians are independent contractors


Fy04 transforming healthcare quality through it

FY04: Transforming Healthcare Quality through IT

  • Planning : up to $7M

    • assist healthcare systems and their partners in planning for activities that will lead to successful HIT implementation

  • Implementation : up to $24M

    • support organizational and community-wide implementation and diffusion of HIT

  • Value : up to $10M

    • assess the value derived from the adoption, diffusion, and utilization of HIT


State and regional demonstrations in health it

State and Regional Demonstrations in Health IT

  • Identify and support statewide data sharing and interoperability activities on a discrete state or regional level.

  • Approximately 5 states

  • $25M over 5 years

  • “Test Beds” to produce demonstrable improvements

  • Improvements must be sustainable beyond end of contract and applicable to other states or regions


Critical challenges

Critical Challenges

  • Common data elements and definitions; build capacity to make improvements

  • Linking implementation to requisite clinical transformation

  • Avoiding the “NIH” syndrome

  • Aligning incentives and rewarding success

  • Making it easy


Contemporary challenges

Contemporary Challenges

  • Scientific basis for safe and appropriate use of diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive interventions -- from and to the point of care

  • Quality improvement as science

  • Translating promising educational models into large-scale improvements in care and outcomes


What is section 1013

What is Section 1013?

  • To improve the quality, effectiveness and efficiency of health care delivered through Medicare, Medicaid and the S-CHIP programs

  • $50 million is authorized in Fiscal Year 2004 for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to conduct and support research with a focus on outcomes, comparative clinical effectiveness and appropriateness of health care items and services (including pharmaceutical drugs), including strategies for how these items and services are organized, managed and delivered


What is section 10131

What is Section 1013?

  • By June 2004, the Secretary shall establish an initial list of research priorities (including those related to prescription drugs)

  • Priorities may include health care items and services which impose a high cost on Medicare, Medicaid or S-CHIP, including those that may be underutilized or over utilized


Shared decision making decisions and outcomes

SHARED DECISION MAKING:DECISIONS AND OUTCOMES

Patient

Alternative 1

Alternative 2


Prequisites for change

PREQUISITES FOR CHANGE

  • Integrating strategy to make existing information accessible with requisite data collection

  • Expected differences in patient experiences (e.g., disparities associated with race, ethnicity and SES)

  • How to present information in usable formats (different versions of “the answers” will be more effective for different audiences)


Focus research and policy

Focus: Research and Policy

  • Describing problems – policy window

  • Developing and testing solutions to problems

  • Evaluating solutions

  • Interaction with stakeholders and decision makers is not optional


Supply side research paradigm

Supply-Side Research Paradigm

  • Research world:

  • Questions

  • Hypothesis

  • Study

  • Userworld:

  • Many needs

  • Beliefs & interests

  • Decision processes

Publication

34

c2

The winding road to a receptor site


Demand supply side model

Demand/Supply Side Model

  • Research world:

  • Questions

  • Hypothesis

  • Study

  • Userworld:

  • Many needs

  • Beliefs & interests

  • Decision processes

34

c2


Approaching knowledge gaps

Approaching Knowledge Gaps

  • Not always head to head

  • Need to be creative

  • Explore new methodologies

  • Examine existing or forthcoming data sources

  • Reserve most expensive approaches for the most important and controversial questions


Essential issues to be addressed

Essential Issues to be Addressed

  • Ethics and Quality Improvement: (when is it research?

  • Identification of subgroups most likely to benefit

  • Identifying critical intervention points (“teachable moments”)

  • Conceptual blueprint for practical clinical trials

  • Integration of disease management with clinical decision support – “knowledge engineering”

  • Patient engagement (including the pre-contemplative)


Questions in search of answers

Questions in Search of Answers

  • Linking knowledge development to policy levers (e.g., payment; regulation): role of ‘demonstrations’

  • When is “good enough”?

  • Vocabulary and pathways for translation of knowledge-based interventions under-developed

  • Concurrent -- or sequential -- evaluation and translation?


Advancing excellence in health care

“It is not enough just to develop new insights into the fundamental nature of disease and its prevention. It is not enough to test that fundamental knowledge in rigorously controlled clinical trials. We must also improve the distribution of that knowledge so that it reaches everyone in the world -- so that everyone will benefit from it.”

Robert H. Brook, M.D., Sc.D., remarks to Research! America, March 20, 2001


  • Login