who do we teach a sociological snapshot of the lander student body
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Who do we Teach ? A Sociological Snapshot of the Lander Student Body

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 52

Who do we Teach ? A Sociological Snapshot of the Lander Student Body - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Who do we Teach ? A Sociological Snapshot of the Lander Student Body. Dr. Dan Harrison, Political and Social Sciences. The Palmetto State. SC has 4.7 million people. 64% are white, 28% black, 5% Hispanic, 1.4% Asian, .5% Native American. 48.4 % male, 51.6 % female

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Who do we Teach ? A Sociological Snapshot of the Lander Student Body' - danae

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
who do we teach a sociological snapshot of the lander student body

Who do we Teach? A Sociological Snapshot of the Lander Student Body

Dr. Dan Harrison, Political and Social Sciences

the palmetto state
The Palmetto State
  • SC has 4.7 million people. 64% are white, 28% black, 5% Hispanic, 1.4% Asian, .5% Native American.
  • 48.4% male, 51.6 % female
  • SC is a very poor state. Median household income (2011): $40,500 (national: $50,054). Second lowest in nation (next to Kentucky)
  • SC historically agrarian economy, now primarily manufacturing, biotech, tourist and service.
  • Politically, culturally, socially, conservative state (but with pockets of blue) (see next slide)
  • For small state, many options for college students (e.g. USC, Clemson, Furman, Wofford, C of C, FM, etc.), plus tech schools, University of Phoenix, etc.
  • State of SC is providing less $$ to Lander and SC system (11.9%, 48th in country; link)
  • Partly, because of this, Lander is ranked 119/651 schools in cost of tuition (link)
2012 presidential returns
2012 Presidential Returns

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:South_carolina_presidential_election_results_2012.svg

lander the school
Lander: The School
  • Started as Williamston Female College in 1872
  • Moved to Greenwood and renamed Lander University in 1904.
  • Became coeducational in 1943. Supported by Methodist Church until 1948.
  • 1951-1973, operated by Greenwood County
  • 1973 became a member of SC state University System (smallest).
rank amongst southern regional colleges
Rank Amongst Southern Regional Colleges


the students
The Students
  • 92% of Lander students are from SC.
    • Top Counties: Greenwood, Greenville, Anderson
top recruitment counties
Top Recruitment Counties

2012 Academic Year:

  • Greenwood (583)
  • Greenville (262)
  • Anderson (230)
  • Richland (216)
  • Lexington (151)
  • Laurens (170)
  • Spartanburg (110)
the students1
The Students
  • 92% of Lander students are from SC
    • Top Counties: Greenwood, Greenville, Anderson
  • 5% are from out of state
    • Top states: Georgia, North Carolina, Florida
  • 3% are foreign students
    • Top countries: Australia, Brazil, China, France, England, Korea, Sweden, Zimbabwe (historically).
the students etc
The Students, etc.
  • 188 students (7% of full time students) are student athletes (and some of better students)
  • 44% of our students come from single parent, divorced, widowed, etc. households.
  • Many are first in family to attend college.
  • Many of our students have overcome significant obstacles to just be here (rape, violence, deaths, etc.)
  • Many students have attended one or more schools before coming to Lander.
  • Many students are religious: In 2013, 55.7 % identify as Baptist or Christian; 10% none; 8% Methodist; 4% Presbyterian; 3% Catholic; 2 % AME, 1% Episcopalian.
  • Are our incoming students getting better or worse?
changing demographics gender
Changing Demographics: Gender
  • Lander started as a women’s college and has been skewed heavily female for some time
  • This imbalance is increasing for all students:
    • Fall 2008: 66.1% female; Fall 2012: 69.6 %.
  • And especially for residential students:
    • Fall 2008: 71.4 % female; Fall 2012: 74.1 %
changing demographics race
Changing Demographics: Race
  • 47% increase in African-American student body at Lander since 2008 (23% increase for males, 55% increase females). (See next slide)
  • In Fall 2012, African-American students 32.6% of total population, white students 57% (in fall 2008, it was 27%, 64% white); few Hispanic students (1%); few Asian students (though increasing)
  • In fall 2012, 42.5% of freshman class was African-American. (See Headcount Spreadsheet).
  • This is highly positive, especially given history of race in SC.
  • Lander has done great job with this.
  • Yet only 23% of students who graduated in May 2013 were black (chart)
  • Also troubling: white prospective students are increasingly less interested in Lander (chart)
changing demographics class
Changing Demographics: Class
  • Lower median household income. In 2008-2009, avg. household income for students filling out a FAFSA was: $59,366; in 2012, it was $56,354 (-$3012)
  • Many of our students come from “hard scrabble” circumstanceswhere often it is rare to graduate from high school, let alone go to college.
  • SC public high school experiences not good for many (fighting, drugs/alcohol, permanent substitutes, bad teachers, etc.)
  • More students working while in school (link). Full time student 15 hrs in class per week + part time job (20 hrs) = 35 hrs/week. Students working full time= 55+ hr week. Less time for being a student.
changing demographics class cont
Changing Demographics: Class (cont).
  • Still, Lander students are significantly richer ($16,000 or so) than avg. SC household.
  • Yet many students have to pay their own way. The avg. student graduates with $26,278. ($3200/semester). Avg. for African-American students likely much higher (though no data on this).
  • Purpose of college has been to lift students into the middle class. This is becoming harder. (NYT link).
  • Have the changing demographics led to worsened academic performance?
academic achievement @lander
Academic Achievement @Lander
  • Average GPA is flat.
  • Most students are doing satisfactorily.
academic achievement cont
Academic Achievement, cont.
  • 91 students (~ 3%) are being actively managed/get assistance for Learning Disability
  • Best Lander students are excellent, but too few in number (in some classes, just 1 or 2 in class);
  • Top Lander Students do very well.
  • At the other end, handful of students at bottom who are quite poor.
  • Large group of students in the middle who are neither (C+/B-and content with grades.
  • Grades are not an incentive for this group (you can motivate the B+ student to get As, and the D student to get a C-, harder to motivate in the middle). Pluses/minuses may help.
  • As instructor at Lander, job is often more about taking student from F>C, or from D>B, than from C>A.
  • Hard to provide one-one-attention in large classes.
the lander campus profile
The Lander Campus Profile
  • In 2012-13, 1482 students lived on campus (54.6 % of full time students).
  • Residential Hall stats.
  • In 2012, 74% of on-campus students were female, 26% male; 12% of on-campus students were white males; 9.7% were black males; 27.8% were white females; 39.4% were black females (very few Asians and Hispanics)
  • In 2008, 908 students lived on campus (39.5%); 71.3% were female; 28.7% male; 15% were white males; 10.7 % were black males; 35.9% were white females; 30.3% were black females.
tale of two campus cultures
Tale of Two Campus Cultures
  • 80% of black female student population and 70% of black males live on campus.
  • BUT, only 40 % of white females and 25% of white males live on campus.
  • Lander increasingly has two campus cultures, one black and residential, one white and based off campus.
  • The white students tend to view the campus instrumentally (come to class, pool, launching pad for off-campus activities such as study abroad); black students are more involved in campus activities, clubs, less likely to have cars, etc.
  • Historical factors (e.g. Jim Crow) and self-segregation processes (e.g. roommate assignments) keep the two groups from mingling. Main time together is in class.
  • White students often come from more rural or “country” places; black students more “urban” – also very different politically.
subcultures on campus
Subcultures on Campus
  • Sociologists in the 1960s Martin and Trow identified four cultures on campus: Vocational, academic, collegiate, and rebel.
  • Developed these categories in terms of trade off between ideas and institutions(on board)
  • Using these terms, I would suggest Lander’s population is Lander is 10 % academic, 10 % rebel, 30% collegiate (“Bearcat”), 50% vocational.
  • This means that half of students identify neither with ideas or with Lander, yet they constitute half of our student body.
  • Unlike the 1960s, vocational students are more likely to live on campus and constitute the campus culture.
campus cultures
Campus Cultures
  • In 2012, 495 students at Lander were a part of an official Student Organization (21.5% of full time students).
  • 12 registered fraternities (~ 9% of FT students)
  • 78.5 % of students (both on and off campus) are NOT involved in campus life.
students seeking more help
Students seeking more help
  • Students are seeking out more assistance and behavioral problems are on the rise.
  • 173 students went to the Counseling Center for help last year (5.6 percent of off campus students; 6.8 percent of on campus students or 3/45 students). Each student visited about 3.5 times. 35 % increase in number of students relative to AY 2011-2012.
  • Freshmen (29%); Juniors (27%); sophomores (24%), seniors (19%).
  • Major issues: stress, anxiety, depression.
health of students
Health of Students
  • Lander’s Health Services saw 2424 students (some of them repeats) in 2012-2013.
  • “One significant area of concern has been the number of students presenting with sexually transmitted infections.” (LU, SABR,)
  • Many of these issues may not specific to Lander; enrollment concerns across higher education; increasing questioning of value of college.
  • Lander student body will always be changing; Rumsfeld doctrine.
  • Lander’s future is tied mainly to Greenwood’s future.
  • Maybe dynamics are outside our control, but achieving a balanced campus culture seems important (true for faculty as well).
  • Campus culture should reflect aims and aspirations of Lander mission (e.g. developing local leaders with global vision).
conclusions cont
Conclusions, cont.
  • Many faculty and students are too busy/stressed to reflect or participate in campus culture during school year.
  • New calendar is mixed blessing.
  • Students now in class 15 hrs a week (pre-calendar change, 13.125); faculty teach 12 hrs in class/ week (used to be 10.5). Lander students faculty and students spend more time in class per week than any other institution.
  • Avg. hours taken is going up (see chart).
  • There is an perverse incentive for students to take as many classes as they can. (The better student, the more classes). Yet this means less time/attention and worse performance in any one class.
  • Few times during day/week when no one is in class.
  • The constraints we impose on ourselves and students are very rigid; yet our students are used to flexibility.
  • Should we concerned about these dynamics?
  • Should we try to attract more out of state students?
  • What are the implications for teaching? (Cynthia and Ashley)
  • How can we get more students at Lander who “exceed” standards? (As small school, shouldn’t be impossible).
  • Are we doing all we can to help low-performing African-American students?
  • Are we doing all we can to attract higher performing minority students? (is this an issue for Honors Program?)
  • What can we do to reach beyond the vocational student who are neither interested in ideas or the institution?
  • Is it possible to adjust the mix of residential students to have more balance on campus, both socially/ethnically, etc. and also academic, collegiate and rebel cultures (and perhaps older students) on campus?
thanks to
Thanks to:
  • Mac Kirkpatrick, Randy Bouknight, Debra “Joe” Franks, Pam Bartley, Cynthia Dysart, Fred Hardin, Tom Covar, and Kim Shannon.
  • Attend Part II of Workshop (Cynthia Gardner and Ashlee Horton’s “…And How do we Reach Them,” on Friday, October 25th.
  • http://www.thestate.com/2013/07/13/2860484/sc-colleges-lead-the-league-in.html
  • http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2013/aug/11/ron-johnson/average-college-degree-takes-six-years-us-sen-ron-/
  • http://www.nbcnews.com/business/students-work-more-college-costs-soar-6C10887939
  • http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/lander-university-3435
  • http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/22/business/in-climbing-income-ladder-location-matters.html?smid=fb-nytimes&WT.z_sma=US_ICI_20130722&_r=1&