1 / 17

Fiorenza Monticelli, HST Monitoring Health Systems Strengthening Dar es Salaam, 16-17 April 2008

Fiorenza Monticelli, HST Monitoring Health Systems Strengthening Dar es Salaam, 16-17 April 2008. The District Health Barometer . Collates, simplifies, displays, compares and monitors health and socioeconomic data at a district and province (sub-national) level

danae
Download Presentation

Fiorenza Monticelli, HST Monitoring Health Systems Strengthening Dar es Salaam, 16-17 April 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fiorenza Monticelli, HST Monitoring Health Systems Strengthening Dar es Salaam, 16-17 April 2008

  2. The District Health Barometer • Collates, simplifies, displays, compares and monitors health and socioeconomic data at a district and province (sub-national) level • Compares equity issues between districts and between provinces; improvements & deterioration over the last few years • Highlights quality of data and monitors improvements • Reviews trends over time, monitoring progress towards goals. • Is used at national, province and district level and influences attitude to M&E and attitude to data quality for decision making

  3. The District Health Barometer Year 1 • Pilot published in in 2005 (2003/04 data) • Provides 15 Health indicators and 1 year of data • comparing: • 53 Health districts • 6 Metropolitan areas • 13 Rural Nodes • 9 Provinces • Short analysis and narrative, indicator definitions

  4. The District Health Barometer 2006/07 • Published in 2007 (3rd year) • 27 Indicators – socioeconomic and health • Up to 4 years of data • Profile for SA, 9 provinces and 52 districts with colour coded ranking • CD with full data file, resources and definitions • A web-enabled GIS District Health Barometer http://webgis.hst.org.za:8081/ • Internship programme

  5. Achievements • Effective communication of district level data to a wide range of users including the non-health sector (politicians, the lay press, Treasury) • Acceptance and use of the publication by the National Department of Health (e.g. by displaying it on their website, quotations, discussed at national conferences) • Growing awareness of the importance of quality of data at sub-national level, improved interrogation of data by managers. • Improved level of transparency

  6. Process • Data collected from Treasury, StatsSA, DHIS, TB register, private sector facilities register • Financial data is coded, data scrutinised, averages calculated, DI calculated, maps and graphs produced • Authors write district profiles and narrative based on data provided (gaps and data irregularities are noted) • Publishing process, launch to NDHSC and press, notifications, dissemination and presentations • Advisory committee meet (DOH, Academic sector, consultants & HST)

  7. The District Health Barometer 2006/07 • 1. Socio-economic Indicators • e.g. Household access to Water , Deprivation index • 2. Input Indicators • e.g. Per Capita Expenditure on Primary Health Care, Cost per Patient Day Equivalent in District Hospitals • 3. Process indicators • e.g. Clinic Supervision Rate, Nurse Clinical Workload

  8. The District Health Barometer 2006/07 • 4. Output Indicators • e.g. Male Condom Distribution Rate • PMTCT Indicators : • Proportion of antenatal clients tested for HIV • HIV prevalence rate amongst antenatal clients tested • Nevirapine uptake rate among HIV+ve pregnant women • Nevirapine uptake rate among babies born to HIV+ve pregnant women • 5. Outcome indicators • e.g. Incidence of new Sexually Transmitted Infections TB Smear conversion rate TB cure rate (new smear +ve) • 6. Impact indicators • e.g. Perinatal Mortality Rate (PNMR)

  9. Examples of data improvement • Financial data: e.g. Non-Hospital Primary Health Care Per Capita Expenditure (HST – more experienced at working with and coding the data) • DHIS data: Nurse Clinical Workload (districts in KZN, NW, NC provinces have improved their data since 2003/04 and WC now provide this data) • Proportion of antenatal clients tested for HIV –national ANC prevalence survey data now available at district level allows for comparison and validation.

  10. Change in Per Capita Expenditure 2001/02 and 2006/07 (real 2006/07 prices) 2001/02 2006/07 SA= R256 SA = R222

  11. Per Capita Expenditure – ISRDP nodes 2001/02 – 2006/07 The difference between the highest and the lowest values moved from a 6.8 fold difference in 2001/02 to a 1.9 fold difference in 2006/07

  12. Data improvementExample: Nurse Clinical workload 2007/8 report - currently investigating application of statistical methods e.g. regression, imputation to fill in missing data, graphing & visualization to detect outliers.

  13. HIV prevalence among ANC clients tested

  14. 57.6% 83.6% TB Cure Rate by District 2005 31.4%

  15. Challenges • Too much data collected at district level which impacts heavily on quality of the DHIS data e.g. data elements for routine collection at facility level = approx 493. • Insufficient monitoring of the data collected by various programs • Insufficient validation and checking of data from district – province – national level – Treasury • Adjustments to data in DHIS made at frequent intervals throughout the year • Key indicators unavailable at district level e.g. Mortality data, HR data • Ownership

  16. The Birchwood National Consultative Health Forum Declaration on Primary Health Care • We, the members of the National Consultative Health Forum, representing government, public and private health sectors, statutory bodies, academic and research institutions, community organisations, civil society, non-governmental organisations and organised labour, in our meeting at Birchwood conference centre, Gauteng Province, held on 10-11 April 2008, on Primary Health Care to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the Alma Ata Declaration, hereby: • Note: • 1. The achievements that have been made in the implementation of the Alma Ata declaration globally, including improving access to Primary Health Care services and equitable allocation of resources. • 2. The Kopanong Declaration on Primary Health Care in 2003 which, inter alia, resolved to implement concrete strategies and processes, with clear targets, to reduce inequities in the allocation of resources for primary health care with a focus on both horizontal and vertical equity. • 3. That there have been many achievements in the delivery of Primary Health Care services in South Africa, but there are still many challenges including availability of adequate human resources for health, improving quality of care, strengthening district management and community participation. • Reaffirm • 1. Our commitment to the principles in the Declaration of Alma Ata, adopted in September 1978. • 2. That health is a state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, and that access to healthcare is a fundamental human right. The attainment of the highest possible level of health is a most important worldwide social goal whose realisation requires the action of many other social and economic sectors in addition to the health sector. • Resolve • That the revisioned and revitalized primary health care strategy for South Africa will include: • 1. Advocating for an increase in the resource allocation for primary health care, by at least doubling the current per capita expenditure over the next ten years. • 2. Better alignment at district level of key interventions that impact on health, notably provision of water and sanitation, early childhood development, recreational programmes, health education and other activities that focus on encouraging healthy lifestyles especially amongst the youth in particular. • 3. Strengthening the role, responsibilities, authority and accountability of the district health management team so as to achieve improved health outcomes. • 4. Strengthening the health information system to generate good quality data for monitoring health outcomes and informing decision making.

  17. THANK YOU • We acknowledge the National Department of Health, Treasury and all other providers for access to and use of their data for this publication and Atlantic Philanthropies for funding the project.

More Related