1 / 27

Overview

APPLICATION OF A WAVELET-BASED RECEIVER FOR THE COHERENT DETECTION OF FSK SIGNALS Dr. Robert Barsanti, Charles Lehman SSST March 2008, University of New Orleans. Overview. Introduction FSK Signals Wavelet Domain Filtering Wavelet Domain Correlation Receiver Simulations and Results Summary.

damon-hansen
Download Presentation

Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. APPLICATION OF A WAVELET-BASED RECEIVER FOR THE COHERENT DETECTION OF FSK SIGNALS Dr. Robert Barsanti, Charles LehmanSSST March 2008, University of New Orleans

  2. Overview • Introduction • FSK Signals • Wavelet Domain Filtering • Wavelet Domain Correlation Receiver • Simulations and Results • Summary

  3. FSK Signals In binary frequency shift keying modulation, the binary information is transmitted using signals at two different frequencies. These signals can be represented as The symbol A represents the signal amplitude, and T is the bit duration. It is easy to show that the bit energy is given by

  4. FSK Signal This figure shows an example of a binary FSK signal. Notice that the transmitted signal case a constant envelope and abrupt phase changes at the beginning of each signal interval.

  5. FSK Probability of Bit Error • Assuming the received signal at the input to the correlator is corrupted with Gaussian noise of zero mean and variance No/2. The probability of bit error can be computed to be [5] • It can be seen that the probability does not depend on the detailed signal and noise characteristics, but only upon the signal to noise ratio per bit (SNR) [6].

  6. The Classical Cross Correlation Receiver for two transmitted signals Detector (choose largest) X Output Symbol ri So X Sample at t = T S1

  7. Signal TRANSFORMATION Noisy Signal Noise Noise Removal • Separate the signal from the noise

  8. Wavelet Filtering

  9. Wavelet Based Filtering THREE STEP DENOISING 1. PERFORM DWT 2. THRESHOLD COEFFICIENTS 3. PERFORM INVERSE DWT

  10. Wavelet Filtering of an FSK Signal DWT of a noise free FSK signal. DWT of noisy FSK signal.

  11. Wavelet Domain Correlation • transform prototype signal into the wavelet domain and pre-stored DWT coefficients • transform received signal into the wavelet domain via the DWT, • apply a non-linear threshold to the DWT coefficients (to remove noise), • correlate the noise free DWT coefficients of the signal, and the pre-stored • DWT coefficients of the prototype signal.

  12. The Wavelet Domain Correlation (WDC) Receiver Bank of Cross-Correlation Receivers Detector (choose largest) Wavelet De-noise r i DWT Output Symbol So DWT S1 DWT

  13. Simulation • FSK signals were generated using 128 samples per symbol • Monte Carlo Runs at each SNR with different instance of AWGN • 10 SNR’s between -6 and +10 dB • Symmlet 8 wavelet & soft threshold • Threshold set to σ/10. • Only 32 coefficients retained

  14. Bit Error Rate Curve for FSK

  15. Bit Error Rate Curves for MFSK

  16. Results • Both the WDC and classical TDC provided similar results. • The WDC provides improvement in processing speed since only • 32 vice 128 coefficients were used in the correlations.

  17. Summary • Receiver for FSK signals in the presence of AWGN. • Uses the cross- correlation between DWT coefficients • Procedure is enhanced by using standard wavelet noise removal techniques • Simulations of the performance of the proposed algorithm were presented.

  18. Wavelets Some S8 Symmlets at Various Scales and Locations 9 8 7 6 5 Scale j 4 3 2 1 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 time index k 1. Can be defined by a wavelet function (Morlet & Mexican hat) 2. Can be defined by an FIR Filter Function (Haar, D4, S8)

  19. EFFECTIVENESS OF WAVELET ANALYSIS • Wavelets are adjustable and adaptable by virtue of large number of possible wavelet bases. • DWT well suited to digital implementation. ~O (N) • Ideally suited for analysis non-stationary signals [ Strang, 1996] • Has been shown to be a viable denoising technique for transients [Donoho, 1995] • Has been shown to be a viable detection technique for transients [Carter, 1994] • Has been shown to be a viable TDOA technique for transients [Wu, 1997]

  20. Wavelet Implementation Response LPF HPF HP Filter Details X(n) LP Filter Frequency Averages F/2 Pair of Half Band Quadrature Mirror Filters (QMF) [Vetterli, 1995]

  21. Signal Reconstruction Two Channel Perfect Reconstruction QMF Bank Analysis + Synthesis = LTI system

  22. Wavelet Implementation [Mallat, 1989] 2 LPLPLP J = 4 2 2 LP LP LP 2 HP LPLPHP J = 3 2 LPHP J = 2 HP 2 HP HP J = 1 2J samples LP HP LPHP LPLPHP LPLPLP

  23. Symmlet Wavelet vs. Time and Frequency

  24. Calculating a Threshold Let the DWT coefficient be a series of noisy observations y(n) then the following parameter estimation problem exists: y(n) = f(n) +s z(n), n = 1,2,…. z ~N(0,1) and s = noise std. s is estimated from the data by analysis of the coefficients at the lowest scale. s = E/0.6475 where E is the absolute median deviation [Kenny]

  25. Thresholding Techniques * Hard Thresholding (keep or kill) * Soft Thresholding (reduce all by Threshold) The Threshold Value is determined as a multiple of the noise standard deviation, eg., T = ms where typically 2< m <5

  26. Hard vs. Soft Thresholds

More Related