Interventional Approaches
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 39

Interventional Approaches to Chronic Pain: Blocks, Stimulators, Pumps PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 82 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Interventional Approaches to Chronic Pain: Blocks, Stimulators, Pumps. Background. Neurosurgical ablative treatments for pain since 19th century but now infrequently used Ablation eclipsed by percutaneous injections or therapies that target central or peripheral pathways Nerve blocks

Download Presentation

Interventional Approaches to Chronic Pain: Blocks, Stimulators, Pumps

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Interventional approaches to chronic pain blocks stimulators pumps

Interventional Approachesto Chronic Pain:Blocks, Stimulators, Pumps


Background

Background

  • Neurosurgical ablative treatments for pain since 19th century but now infrequently used

  • Ablation eclipsed by percutaneous injections or therapies that target central or peripheral pathways

    • Nerve blocks

    • Spinal stimulation

    • Pumps


Nerve blocks i

Nerve Blocks (I)

  • Diagnostic: local anesthetic only, to clarify mechanism or simulate effects of therapy

  • Therapeutic: anesthetize a site or pathway temporarily (local anesthetic) or “permanently” (lytic agent), or reduce inflammation (corticosteroid)

  • A block may be both diagnostic and therapeutic, eg, sympathetic block or trigger-point injection


Nerve blocks ii

Nerve Blocks (II)

  • Common blocks for chronic pain include

    • Trigger-point injection

    • Tourniquet or Bier block

    • Peripheral nerve injection (eg, ilioinguinal, lateral femoral cutaneous, greater occipital)

    • Paravertebral (nerve root) injection

    • Epidural injection

    • Intra-articular (eg, facet, SI) injection

    • Sympathetic block (cervical, lumbar)

    • Plexus block (celiac, hypogastric)


Nerve blocks iii

Nerve Blocks (III)

  • Case reports, preclinical data support long-lasting effects of local anesthetic blockade

    • RCTs support lytic celiac block

  • However, unclear how much clinical improvement reflects placebo effects, irrelevant cues, systemic absorption of local anesthetic, expectations

  • Side effects possible

  • Rarely successful as a “stand-alone” strategy for chronic pain


Trigger point injection i

Trigger-Point Injection I

  • Essential criteria

    • Taut band palpable (if muscle accessible)

    • Exquisite spot tenderness of a nodule in a taut band

    • Pressure on tender nodule reproduces pain

    • Range of motion with stretch limited by pain

  • Confirmatory observations

    • Visual or tactile identification of local twitch response

    • Local twitch response on needling tender nodule

    • Pain/hyperesthesia in recognized pattern

    • Activity in tender nodule on EMG


Trigger point injection ii

Trigger-Point Injection II

  • Trigger points may refer pain

    • Toward the periphery (eg, suboccipital, infraspinatus)

    • Proximally or medially (eg, biceps brachii)

    • Locally (eg, serratus posterior inferior)

  • Techniques

    • Needle only (no injection)

    • Local anesthetic only

    • Local anesthetic + glucocorticoid (evidence?)

    • Botulinum toxin type A


Trigger point injection iii

Trigger-Point Injection III

Reproduced with permission from Simons DG, et al. Travell & Simons’ Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. Vol. 1. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Williams & Wilkins; 1999:160.


Trigger point injection iii1

Trigger-Point Injection III

Reproduced with permission from Simons DG, et al. Travell & Simons’ Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. Vol. 1. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Williams & Wilkins; 1999:159.


Tourniquet or bier block

Tourniquet or Bier Block

  • Facilitates mobilization of upper or lower extremity in known or suspected CRPS

  • Same technique for sympathetically-maintained versus sympathetic-independent pain

  • Many variants: all use IV cannulation, drainage of blood (gravity, Esmarch’s bandage), proximal tourniquet (eg, systolic BP + 100), slow release after ~20 min

  • Medications: local anesthetic, many others (sympatholytic, anti-inflammatory)


Peripheral nerve injection

Peripheral Nerve Injection

  • Spontaneous entrapment syndromes

    • Greater occipital (occipital neuralgia)

    • Lateral femoral cutaneous (meralgia paresthetica)

    • Ilioinguinal

  • Post-incisional or post-traumatic neuroma

    • Cranial (post-craniotomy)

    • Intercostal (post-thoracotomy)

    • Abdominal wall (trochar sites)

    • Herniorrhaphy

  • Local anesthetic + glucocorticoid


Paravertebral nerve root injection

Paravertebral (Nerve Root) Injection

  • Diagnostic

    • Establish or confirm anatomic mechanism of pain (eg, atypical dermatomal distribution in disk disease or multilevel foraminal stenosis)

  • Therapeutic

    • Deposit local anesthetic plus glucocorticoid via paravertebral and/or transforaminal approach

  • Technique

    • Fluoroscopy or CT essential to validate, document needle placement

    • Radiopaque contrast outlines/tracks root


Epidural injection i

Epidural Injection (I)

  • Employed for decades using various techniques, materials, and patients

    • Poor documentation of diagnosis, pain, technique, outcomes

  • Limited RCT evidence of efficacy in subpopulations, but most reports are case series

  • Techniques (glucocorticoid + local anesthesic)

    • Translaminar

    • Transforaminal

    • Caudal (useful if prior lumbar surgery, scarring)


Interventional approaches to chronic pain blocks stimulators pumps

Trans-Ligamental Injection

Reproduced with permission from Covino BG, Scott DB. Handbook of Epidural Anaesthesia and Analgesia. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton, Inc; 1985:90.


Interventional approaches to chronic pain blocks stimulators pumps

Sacral Extradural Injection

Reproduced with permission from Eriksson E, ed. Illustrated Handbook in Local Anaesthesia. 2nd ed. London, Eng: Lloyd-Luke (Medical Books) Ltd; 1979:135.


Epidural injection ii

Epidural Injection (II)

  • Applied for symptomatic relief in

    • Disk protrusion with radiculopathy

    • Spinal stenosis (circumferential or foraminal)

    • Acute pain, local inflammation of vertebral fracture ( subsequent vertebroplasty)

    • ? Acute herpes zoster, using local anesthetic alone

  • May facilitate rehabilitation, avert surgery when applied within multidisciplinary framework


Interventional approaches to chronic pain blocks stimulators pumps

Layering of Contrast in Epidural Space (C5-6 Epidural)


Intra articular injection

Intra-Articular Injection

  • Facet, large joints, sacroiliac most common

  • Diagnostic

    • Clarify clinical impression of a “facet syndrome” or “SI joint pain”

    • (Facet:) simulate results of potential spinal fusion or denervation of medial branch of dorsal ramus

  • Therapeutic (local anesthetic + glucocorticoid)

    • Reduce inflammation, pain

    • Increase mobility, facilitate rehabilitation

  • Controversy as to efficacy and effectiveness


Interventional approaches to chronic pain blocks stimulators pumps

C 3-4 Facet Injection (Lateral View)


Interventional approaches to chronic pain blocks stimulators pumps

S1 Root Block (Trans-Sacral)


Sympathetic block

Sympathetic Block

  • Diagnostic

    • Superior cervical (“stellate”) ganglion

    • Lumbar

    • Note need for (but insurers’ reluctance to pay for) placebo controls

  • Therapeutic

    • CRPS of upper, lower extremity

    • Facial neuralgias

  • Technique

    • Local anesthetic

    • Neurolytic


Interventional approaches to chronic pain blocks stimulators pumps

Lumbar Sympathetic Block (Lateral View)


Plexus block celiac hypogastric

Plexus Block (Celiac, Hypogastric)

  • Visceral nociceptive afferent pathways are heterogeneous: sympathetic (eg, celiac), parasympathetic (eg, hypogastric)

  • Meta-analysis indicates efficacy of celiac block for abdominal cancer pain, but case series show little benefit (<10%) in chronic pancreatitis

  • Case series of hypogastric block for perineal pain

  • Technique

    • Fluoroscopy or CT essential for safety, documentation

    • Reversible block with local anesthetic

    • Neurolysis with alcohol, phenol


Interventional approaches to chronic pain blocks stimulators pumps

Celiac Block (Lateral View)


Interventional approaches to chronic pain blocks stimulators pumps

CT-Guided Celiac Block


Spinal cord stimulation

Spinal Cord Stimulation

  • Background: peripheral electrical stimulation for pain control since prehistory; recent “gate theory”

  • Retrospective, uncontrolled case series show that SCS can reduce intensity of neuropathic pain

  • Biases in existing literature (lack of blinding, heterogeneity of interventions/assessments, small numbers) confound its interpretation

  • Recent 6-month RCT: “with careful selection of patients and successful test stimulation, SCS is safe, reduces pain and improves HRQOL in chronic RSD” (Kemler MA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2000; N = 36)


Possible risks scs or pump

Possible Risks (SCS or Pump)

  • Non-specific: electrical, mechanical (migration, separation of electrode or catheter) failure

  • Route-specific: infection, fibrosis, extrusion

  • Drug-specific (pump): neurotoxicity, sedation, constipation, hypotension…

  • For opioids (pump): constipation, urinary retention, nausea, impotence, nightmares, pruritus, edema, sweating, fatigue…


Implanted pumps for pain

Implanted Pumps for Pain

  • Spinal anesthesia ~100 y

  • Selective spinal opioid analgesia ~25 y

  • Early chronic use of opioid PCEA supplanted by intrathecal cannulation

  • Single agents: opioids, local anesthetics, NSAIDs, clonidine, cholinomimetics, calcium channel blockers, GABA-A and -B, peptides, NMDA antagonists, adenosine

  • Combinations: opioid-opioid, opioid-local anesthetic, morphine-clonidine…


Theoretical benefits of it rx i

Theoretical Benefits of IT Rx (I)

  • “Targeting” offers dosage reductions

  • Only route possible for certain drugs

  • Fewer side effects from decreased and spatially restricted dosage

  • Greater efficacy from targeted, higher concentrations (eg, in neuropathic pain) and locally applied combinations


Theoretical benefits of it rx ii

Theoretical Benefits of IT Rx (II)

  • Nociceptive activity provokes persistent functional and morphologic changes

  • Pain, especially chronic pain, is a disease

  • Spinal analgesic therapy = “dorsal horn amnesia”*

  • “Combination analgesic chemotherapy”*

*See Carr DB, Cousins MJ. Spinal route of analgesia. Opioids and future options. In: Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:915-983.


Algogenic neuropoiesis

“Algogenic Neuropoiesis”

  • Transformation of neuronal morphology and function as the result of nociception*

  • “Poiesis” = organized creation, growth

  • A highly organized process (Ca++, second messengers, oxidative stress, novel gene expression, growth factors, apoptosis)

*See Walker S, et al. Anesth Analg. In press.


It analgesia evidence

IT Analgesia: Evidence

  • Abundant preclinical proof of IT analgesia using various agents, singly or in combination

  • Narrative reviews from 1980s–1990s summarize clinical effectiveness and conclude IT analgesia generally is safe, well-tolerated, effective for acute or chronic cancer and noncancer pain


It evidence limitations i

IT Evidence: Limitations (I)

  • Level 5 clinical evidence (uncontrolled case reports/series)—like >90% of all pain literature

  • Inclusion based upon failure of prior therapy but unclear whether/how therapy optimized

  • Nonuniform or unknown Dx, pain/QOL scores

  • Side effects vs effects: “different dimensions”

  • Limited psychologic, toxicologic data

  • Effect of drug redistribution?


It evidence limitations ii

IT Evidence: Limitations (II)

  • No controls = UNDEFINABLE relative efficacy!

  • Without data on relative efficacy, algorithms/guidelines follow “practice-based evidence”

  • For evidence-based practice, RCTs or CCTs are necessary to control for expectations, psychosocial and placebo/nocebo effects

  • “Consort” statement needed for pain trials

  • “Need for additional large published controlled studies… highlighted” by review of Bennett et al*

*See Bennett G, et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000;20:S37-S43.


Intrathecal opioids prospects

Intrathecal Opioids: Prospects

  • Opportunity for translational research on “dorsal horn amnesia”

  • Need for uniformity, control groups

  • Requirement for appropriately powered trials: “size does matter”

  • Control for drug interactions

  • Long-term follow-up

  • Clinical consensus drives initial opioid use alone, but may be better to start with combinations


Prudent practice

Prudent Practice

  • Any nerve block, no matter how deftly and carefully performed, can lead to sudden complications related to intraneural, intraspinal, or intravascular injection

  • Anyone who considers performing a nerve block should provide monitoring, vigilance during and afterwards, and resources for prompt resuscitation


A thought

A Thought

  • Interventional approaches often are reserved for patients with well-established problems, failure of other Rx, and pronounced disability

  • Do we miss an opportunity for early, cost-effective preventive treatment by reserving interventions for those least likely to benefit?

  • Established neuropoiesis, entrenched pain behavior, proven self-advocacy in disabled role may explain data on low likelihood of return to work

  • “Youth is a wonderful thing; what a crime to waste it on children” (George Bernard Shaw)


Conclusions

Conclusions

  • Best to reserve blocks, other invasive Rx for when other modalities fail?

  • Substantial risks and benefits of SCS, IT Rx

  • Stand-alone interventions less likely to succeed than multidisciplinary ones

  • Irresistible force (evidence-based medicine) now is meeting immovable object (case reports, customary practice)

  • Needed: outcomes data on effectiveness and large RCTs re: efficacy


  • Login