Cavendish experiment
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 27

Cavendish Experiment PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 86 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Cavendish Experiment. Presented by Mark Reeher. Lab Partner: Jon Rosenfield For Physics 521. Presentation Overview. Historical Background Theory Experimental Setup and Methods Results Analysis of Results Uncertainties Conclusions. Brief Timeline of Gravitational Physics.

Download Presentation

Cavendish Experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Cavendish experiment

Cavendish Experiment

Presented by Mark Reeher

Lab Partner: Jon Rosenfield

For Physics 521


Presentation overview

Presentation Overview

  • Historical Background

  • Theory

  • Experimental Setup and Methods

  • Results

  • Analysis of Results

    • Uncertainties

  • Conclusions


Brief timeline of gravitational physics

Brief Timeline of Gravitational Physics

  • 4th Century B.C: Aristotle – tendency of objects to be pulled to Earth

  • 1645: Ismael Bulliadus - inverse square relation

  • 1665: Sir Isaac Newton -

  • 1798: Henry Cavendish – calculation of Universal Gravitation Constant, G

  • Early 1900s: Einstein-

    • Inertia-gravitation equivalence

    • General relativity


Cavendish experiment1

Cavendish Experiment

  • John Michell – conception of experiment

    • Torsion Balance

  • Henry Cavendish – rebuilt balance and

    ran experiment in

    1797-1798

  • Basic Idea – directly

    measure Fg, find G

  • Found:

    G = 6.754 × 10−11 m3kg-1s-2


Committee on data for science and technology s value

Committee on Data for Science and Technology’s Value


Theory experimental design

Theory – Experimental Design

  • Large masses brought near small masses

  • Gravitational force  movement in torsion balance

  • Study motion to determine Fg

  • With Fg, measure M, m, r

    • Newton’s gravitational equation

    • Result = calculated G


Derivation 1

Top View

Derivation - 1


Derivation 2

Derivation - 2


Small angle approximation

Small Angle Approximation

  • For simplicity, we assume θ is very small

    • Torque dot product

    • Tan θ = θ

  • This assumption confirmed by finding the largest possible angle of setup

    • θmax = 0.03884 = 2.226º

    • ~0.05% difference between tan θ and θ


Experimental setup

Experimental Setup


Experimental setup1

Experimental Setup

Torsion balance enclosure

Large masses

Vacuum pump (oil)

He-Ne laser

Ametek plotter (converted)


Setup diagram

Setup Diagram

Laser

Plotter


Setup diagram1

Setup Diagram

So we need to keep in mind, the plotter reacts to 2θ


Setup notes

Setup Notes

  • Torsion enclosure pumped to ~100 mTorr

  • Data recorded automatically in Labview

    • Photodiode position vs time (4 s intervals)

  • Six total trials

    • 2 counter-clockwise (positive) torque

    • 2 clockwise (negative)torque

    • 2 no mass


Results our measurements

Results (Our Measurements)

  • Given in lab manual

    • m = 0.019 kg

    • Mrod = 0.031 kg (square cross section)

    • L/2 = 15.24 cm

  • Distance measurements (in inches)

  • Dd (mirror-diode) = 45 1/32”

  • ω and θ are found from Matlab data

1

2

4

3


Analysis

Analysis

  • Data from best fit:

    • General model:

      f(x) = a*exp(-x/b)*cos(c*x+d)+e

    • Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):

             a =         131  (130.4, 131.6)

             b =  1.029e+004  (1.006e+004, 1.051e+004)

             c =    0.007577  (0.007575, 0.007579)

             d =    0.004448  (0.0001244, 0.008771)

             e =       682.1  (681.9, 682.3)

    • Goodness of fit:

        SSE: 1000

        R-square: 0.9986

        Adjusted R-square: 0.9986

        RMSE: 1.002


Analysis1

Analysis

  • I calculation

  • Κ calculation

  • Avg K = 2.60588 x 10-7+ 1.197 x 10-11 kg m/s2


Analysis2

Analysis

  • ri calculation (m)

  • θ calculation

  • Avg eo from “NM” values:

    eo = 3.954” + 0.000177”

  • Define xi = eo - ei


Analysis3

Analysis

  • Now find θ from tan-1:

  • Finally… we find G (m3s-2):

  • Avg G = (3.89829 x 10-10+ 1.7129 x 10-11)/M


Uncertainty

Uncertainty

  • Total Uncertainty relation for G:

000000000000


Uncertainty1

Uncertainty

  • Each of the four variables also had combined uncertainty in their calculation

    • All type A aside from distance measurements

  • In a few cases, values were averaged:


Conclusions

Conclusions

  • M = 5.701 kg †

    • Gives us:

    • GCavendish = 6.754 × 10−11 m3kg-1s-2

    • GCODATA = 6.67428 × 10−11 m3kg-1s-2

  • Obvious setup interference

  • MEarth

Accepted value = 5.97 x 1024 kg

† conversation with Jose


  • Login