1 / 31

New Local Report Card May 8, 2012 Matt Cohen Chief Research Officer Ohio Department of Education

New Local Report Card May 8, 2012 Matt Cohen Chief Research Officer Ohio Department of Education. No Child Left Behind (2001). Yet to be reauthorized States encouraged to present innovative reforms Waiver offers flexibility on rules in exchange for:

dalmar
Download Presentation

New Local Report Card May 8, 2012 Matt Cohen Chief Research Officer Ohio Department of Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New Local Report Card May 8, 2012 Matt Cohen Chief Research Officer Ohio Department of Education

  2. No Child Left Behind (2001) Yet to be reauthorized States encouraged to present innovative reforms Waiver offers flexibility on rules in exchange for: • Higher student achievement, and • Greater school accountability 11 States already approved, 26 applied Approval expected in May

  3. Key Elements of Waiver

  4. Accountability Elements of Waiver

  5. AYP Replacement AYP calls for 100% proficiency for everyone by 2014-2015: not realistic New goals: • Implement more rigorous learning standards • Cut achievement gaps by half over six years

  6. Without the Waiver Estimated that 90% of Ohio’s LEAs will not meet AYP

  7. AYP Goals for Reading Reading Goals

  8. Raising Performance For All Students Reading Goals Progress

  9. AYP Replacement AYP Gap Closing Rigorous and Punitive Rigorous and Fair

  10. Letter Grade Ratings

  11. Report Card Components

  12. Student Performance Performance Index Student Performance

  13. Student Performance

  14. District Performance District Performance State Indicators Met Applies to District & School

  15. District Performance

  16. Other Possible Indicators ACT Rates Remediation Rates Kindergarten Readiness Gifted Indicator

  17. District Contribution to Student Performance Applies to District & School

  18. District Contribution to Student Performance Student Progress Value-Added Uses Two Years of Data

  19. District Contribution to Student Performance

  20. District Gap Closing AYP Performance Gap Applies to District & School

  21. District Gap Closing

  22. Overall Grade • Many Options Being Considered • Which Components? • How to “Weight” Components? • How to Assign Points? • What Point Ranges Equate to Grades?

  23. Overall Grade ONE EXAMPLE Value-Added = 40% of Overall Grade

  24. Overall Grade

  25. Overall Grade

  26. Simulated 2011 Letter Grade Ratings Updated waiver request Not this year’s data, not a prediction Business rules may change

  27. Simulated 2011 Letter Grade Ratings – 609 School Districts

  28. Are You Ready?

  29. Are You Ready? Estimate of performance with new rigor Temporary section Percentage of students scoring “Accelerated” or “Advanced” on math and reading assessments

  30. Questions?

More Related