1 / 34

Project presentation

Project presentation. Place / Date / Organization met. Partner organization name and name of the speaker. NIVT Romania. Presentation of the partner (if necessary) 1 slide (no more). A bottom-up approach of ECVET.

daktari
Download Presentation

Project presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project presentation Place / Date / Organization met Partner organization name and name of the speaker NIVTRomania

  2. Presentation of the partner (if necessary) 1 slide (no more)

  3. A bottom-up approach of ECVET > >>European Class in Trucks Maintenance,an innovative mobility programme > >>European Class in truck Maintenance,toward recognized mobility: ECVET

  4. > >> European Class in Trucks Maintenance:an innovative European mobility programme • Started in 2003 • All pedagogical organization developed by partners on their own funds. • Mobility financed by LdV (for 2 partners) • Initial Partners:

  5. Initial Partners “Institutional / Branches” “Training Centres” Transportgruppen Kungsbacka Kommun Kungbacka ANFA CFI Chamber of Commerce of Paris Generalitat de Catlunya Escola de Treball.

  6. To offer to Young a European Training pathway. • To develop the transnational mobility of young Europeans in VET in the Trucks Maintenance sector. • To create a potential workforce with expertise in management for Trucks networks. Objectives • TO UPGRADE EMPLOYABILITY • TO ANSWER TO THE TRAINING NEEDS OF THE COMPANIES

  7. European common Core Module technical Inspection technique > France 1 Module Training Animation > Catalonia / Spain 2 Module Customer Communication > Sweden 3 Principles / Mechanisms The 3 technical modules are delivered in English to the Young from the 3 countries. Spanish Training pathway CFGS Automacion French training pathway BTS Maintenance et Après vente Véhicules Industriels Swedish Training pathway Vehicle Programme Each trainee prepares his national qualification (10 / 12 Young per country)

  8. A 1st year Dec Feb Mar Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Jan Apr May DOMESTIC TRAINING A Principles / Mechanisms

  9. 1 A 1st year Dec Feb Mar Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Jan Apr May 1 DOMESTIC TRAINING EUROPEAN CLASS A Principles / Mechanisms

  10. 1 B A Dec Feb Mar Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Jan Apr May 1 DOMESTIC TRAINING EUROPEAN CLASS B Principles / Mechanisms 1st year

  11. 2 1 B A Dec Feb Mar Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Jan Apr May 2 DOMESTIC TRAINING EUROPEAN CLASS B Principles / Mechanisms 1st year

  12. 2 1 C B A Dec Dec Feb Feb Mar Mar Jun Jun Jul Jul Aug Aug Sep Sep Oct Oct Nov Nov Jan Jan Apr Apr May May C 2nd year 2 DOMESTIC TRAINING EUROPEAN CLASS C HOLIDAYS Principles / Mechanisms 1st year

  13. 2 1 C B A Dec Dec Feb Feb Mar Mar Jun Jun Jul Jul Aug Aug Sep Sep Oct Oct Nov Nov Jan Jan Apr Apr May May 3 C 3 B Principles / Mechanisms 1st year 2nd year DOMESTIC TRAINING EUROPEAN CLASS HOLIDAYS NEW 3 m MR

  14. 2 1 C B A D Dec Dec Feb Feb Mar Mar Jun Jun Jul Jul Aug Aug Sep Sep Oct Oct Nov Nov Jan Jan Apr Apr May May 3 C 3 D Principles / Mechanisms 1st year 2nd year DOMESTIC TRAINING EUROPEAN CLASS HOLIDAYS

  15. Statement after 3 “European class” group > Added Value • For final beneficiaries (learners): competence, behaviour, autonomy, maturity • For companies: a concrete answer to a HR need and to have a potential of “European” employees • For training Centres: setting up of a European dynamic and improving links with companies • Frustration: No formal recognition of the European training path (it’s added to the regular domestic training) a part from the statement in the Europass > ECVET could be a solution.

  16. > >> European Class in Trucks Maintenance:Towards recognized mobility • In the perspective of ECVET: enlargement of the partnership NEW 3 m MR

  17. “Institutional / Branches” “Training Centres” Transportgruppen Kungsbacka Kommun Kungbacka SIMI Warsaw Municipality ANFA CFI Chamber of Commerce of Paris National VET Centre Generalitat de Catlunya Escola de Treball. Initial Partners & New Comers NEW 3 m MR

  18. Module technical Inspection technique > France 1 Module Training Animation > Catalonia / Spain 2 Module Customer Communication > Sweden 3 Tech. Inspection 1 Training delivery 2 Customer Coml 3 Training Delivery 2 Tech. Inspection 1 Training Delivery 2 Customer Com. 3 Customer Com. 3 Tech. Inspection 1 Towards recognized mobility European common Core Objective: to recognize the L.O. of the 3 units obtained abroad as part of the qualification (not added modules to the present one) Spanish Training pathway French training pathway Swedish Training pathway NEW 3 m MR

  19. What does it imply(according to ECVET) ? • Qualification in units of Learning outcomes • Units identified as opened to mobility to be written according to ECVET technical specifications • Transfer process • MoU and Learning agreement • Method of allocation of credit point MoU and Learning agreement Reminder of the ECVET process NEW 3 m MR

  20. Reminder of the ECVET process NEW 3 m MR

  21. Challenges faced Thought the mobility programme carried out Through ECT common action Mutual Trust : Stable & structural Partnership Mutual Trust : Quality criteria definition Identification of the Training Pathway Common writing of units of L.O. L.O. Assessment Organisation of the Mobility (group) Credit point allocation Training Organisation (group) Modularisation(3 modules dedicated to mobility) Recognition Procedures > Competent Institutions Individual Mobility programme Identification of L.O.

  22. How do we cooperate? European Class in Trucks Maintenance European Network NEW 3 m MR

  23. New Comers in the way to start a “regular” mobility program in order to implement the mutual trust Initial partners still carrying out the European Class program Poland Spain «Training delivery» Sweden «Customers Communication» Romania France «Technical Inspection » Ireland Mobility program Exchange of practices, tools, feedback, share of experiences NEW 3 m MR

  24. Training Process on ECVET Definition of an Information process on ECVET Creation of a training set Elaboration of the training content Elaboration of pedagogical tools Testing of the tools European Technical Unit (opened to mobility) Leader > Branch (Ireland) Producing of the content of technical units Elaboration of the training program Elaboration the Assessment process Realisation and testing of supports tools Definition of a global implementation process Elaborations of support tools Definition of Mutual trust implementation scenarios Elaboration of guide with scenarios Elaboration of standard agreements for training centres Elaboration of letter of intent as godfather for institutions Elaboration of a visit grid to be filled in with the information stated below Elaboration of different models of transfer of the European class concept Ins (Spain) Branch (Sweden) Leader >TC (CFI France) Ins (Romania) Ins (Poland) TC (Sweden) Branch (France) TC (Spain) Ins (Poland) Ins (Romania) Ins (Ireland) Mutual Trust Process Leader > Ins (Poland) Recognition Process Identification of VET requirements at the national level Adaptation of the specifications to national context Compilation of the Feedbacks with national authorities Elaboration of scenarios Ins (Spain) Branch (Sweden) Leader > Branch (France) Ins (Romania) Ins (Poland) Ins (Spain) Branch (Sweden) TC (France) Branch (France) Ins (Romania) Ins (Poland) TC (Sweden) Ins (Ireland) ECVET Project NEW 3 m MR

  25. Poland Spain Sweden Romania France Ireland Long term objective ECVET Mobility Cross links with all euro class partners NEW 3 m MR

  26. > >>Conclusion A bottom-up approach: close to the ground (practical approach) > concrete in terms of mobility and added value, The ECVET implementation will take time, Must train people (stakeholders, Training centres managers, teachers, entrepreneurs, etc.), A vocabulary work should be done (at least between partners of 1 project): often same word does not imply same understanding (not only for translations reasons: e.g. L.O. does not mean the same for all European people) More difficult at the Unit design level than a bottom up approach, Clear (relevant) added value for learners and companies, Actors, will be source (force) of proposal in order to simplify the ECVET process (respecting technical specifications), NEW 3 m MR

  27. Thank you very much for your attention Contact Persons Promotor: Mona Hildell (SW) mona.hildell@kungsbacka.se Coordinator : Didier Gelibert (FR) gelibertd@anfa-auto.fr NEW 3 m MR

  28. Unit of LO Unit of LO UNIT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO Unit of LO ECVET technical reminder

  29. 3 MECT imply hosting PRESENTAT I ON PREPARAT I ON REMINDER OF 1 PREPARAT I ON REMINDER OF 2 EVALUAT I ON 1st module in France 2nd module in Spain 3rd Modulein Sweden

  30. ECVET: the mechanism Learning Context B Learningcontext A M. X has an opportunity for a learning period abroad Learning outcomes

  31. ECVET: the mechanism 3 MECT imply hosting Learning Context B Learningcontext A …and Mr wants to transfer his new L.O. inorder to be integrated in the qualification he’s preparing Learning Outcomes

  32. The Learning Agreement should establish that, if thelearner has achieved the expected learning outcomes and these have been positively assessed by the ‘hosting’ institution, the ‘home’ institution can validate and recognise them as part of the requirements for a qualification, according to the rules and procedures established by the competent institution.

  33. Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) It confirms that each partner: • accept each other’s status as competent institutions; • accept each other's quality assurance, assessment, validation and recognitioncriteria and procedures as satisfactory for the purposes of credit transfer; • agree the conditions for the operation of the partnership, such as objectivesduration and arrangements for review of the MoU; • agree on the comparability of qualifications concerned for the purposes of credittransfer, using EQF to establish the reference levels; • identify other actors and competent institutions that may be involved in theprocess concerned and their functions.

  34. Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Phase 1 Identification of the qualification and units (if existing or to be defined) Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O Phase 2 : Identification of units « opened to mobility » in relation with the common core Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O. Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Unit of L.O Ireland France Sweden Catalunya Poland Romania Phase 3 : Common writing These units should fit with current qualification

More Related