- 228 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Monte Carlo Methods in Forecasting the Demand for Electricity

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Monte Carlo Methods in Forecasting the Demand for Electricity

Frank S. McGowan

Market Forecast Department

October 26, 2007

- BC Hydro
- Load Forecasting at BC Hydro
- Stochastic Forecasting
- Monte Carlo Simulation
- BC Hydro’s Monte Carlo Model
- Model Results
- Description of the Model
- Comparison with Other Methods
- Conclusion

- BC Hydro is the major provider of electricity in the province of British Columbia.
- It is one of the largest electric utilities in Canada
- 1.7 million customers in an area containing over 94 per cent of BC's population. (4,364,565 in 2007).
- Generating capacity over 11,000 megawatts (MW)
- 90.3% from hydroelectric sources .
- BC Hydro's various facilities generate between 43,000 and 54,000 gigawatt hours of electricity annually, depending on prevailing water levels.
- For fiscal 2006, domestic electric sales volume reached 52,440 gigawatt hours. and 52,911 for fiscal 2007.
- Net income was $266 million In fiscal 2006, $407 million in fiscal 2007.
- Employees 4,546 in March 2007 - Including its subsidiaries and British Columbia Transmission Corporation.
- New Energy – Green Emphasis
- Independent Power Producers
- Site-C

- Starting point for the Monte Carlo Model is Reference Case Forecast.
- Major categories - Residential, Commercial and Industrial.
- Regions - Lower mainland (including the city of Vancouver), Vancouver Island, the southern interior and the northern region.
- The time horizon - 21 years from 2007 to 2028.
- Key Drivers - number of accounts, GDP, retail sales, employment, housing starts, population, weather, price of electricity and price of natural gas.
- Detailed End Use Models
- High Level Regression Models
- Judgment
- Statistically Adjusted End Use Models (SAE models by ITRON).

- The Future is Uncertain. A deterministic forecast provides an incomplete picture. The appropriate model is a stochastic process.
- Definition (informal) : A stochastic process is a collection of random variables X together with their probability distributions which are indexed by time.
{ F( X, t ) }

- Let y(t) and xj(t) (j=1,…k) be random variables defined by stochastic processes.
- Suppose there is a model that relates these variables.
y(t) = L (x1(t), x2(t), …, xk(t) )

- If the probability distributions of the independent variables are known, then the model specifies the probability distribution of y(t).
- But it would usually be very difficult to work out this distribution analytically.
- Monte Carlo Simulation allows us to bypass this difficulty. @RISK facilitates these simulations.

Monte Carlo Methods

Monte Carlo Model:

Probability distributions are specified for each input variable.

The mode uses samples from these and calculates many realizations of the output variables which are then used to determine output variable probability distributions.

.

Input Variables with Probability Distributions

Samples

Model

Realizations

Output Variables with Probability Distributions

- What it Does
- Provides stochastic forecast by calculating a probability distribution for Load in each year of the forecast period. And for each category.

- How it Does It
- Key Drivers
- GDP of British Columbia
- Weather (Heating Degree Days)
- Price of Electricity (Rates)

- Probability Distributions are Specified for Each Driver using @RISK
- The Model calculates output variables
- Probability distributions for output variables are calculated by @RISK

- Key Drivers

Similar Table for Each Category

A probability distribution for each year and for each category.

Width of Distributions Increases With Time

- The stochastic forecast is generated by multiplying the reference case forecast by Stochastic Impact Factors.
- L(t) = L0(t) FG FW FP FU
- L0 = Base Case Load
- FG = GDP factor
- FW= Weather factor
- FP = Own Price factor
- FU= Residual factor

- Gt - GDP at time t.
- 0Gt - Reference case GDP forecast (from CFB Canada).
- gt - growth rate of reference case forecast.
- Perturbed GDP forecast grows by the equation:
Gt = Gt-1 ( 1 + gt + ut )

- ut - perturbation that is N(0,s) with s = 1.54%
- FG the GDP impact factor is given by:
FG = exp[ a ln(Gt / 0Gt ) ] = ( Gt / 0Gt )awhere:

a=0.65 is the elasticity of Load with respect to GDP.

Price Impact Factor

- 0Pt - Base Case Price forecast .
- Pt - Perturbed Price forecast at time t.
- gt- growth rate of reference case Price forecast.
- Perturbed Price forecast grows by the equation:
Pt = Pt-1 ( 1 + gt + ut )

- ut -perturbation that has as its probability distribution RISKTRIANG(2.5%,0,+2.5%).
- FP the Price Impact factor is given by:
FG = exp[ e ln(Pt / 0Pt ) ] = ( Pt / 0Pt )ewhere:

e = the elasticity of Load with respect to GDP.

- Short run price elasticity -0.10 (Residential)
- Long run price elasticity -0.30 (Residential)
- Impact of a Price change is felt over a period of n years afterwards.
- The Phased in Elasticity applicable y<=n years after a price change is:
ey = eS + ( eL - eS ) * ( y / n)

- For each year, the model aggregates the effects of all previous price changes using appropriate phased in elasticities.

- Different price change scenarios can specified by choosing the reference case growth rate gt .
- Probability distributions are then calculated around whatever scenario is used as a reference case.

- Weather’s effect on energy consumption in BC is primarily due the use of electricity for heating.
- This effect is modeled using Heating Degree Days (HDD).
- Daily HDD=Max(0,18-ave. daily temperature)

- Annual HDD =SUM over year ( Daily HDD).
- @RISK’s fitting features were used to estimate a probability density function for Annual HDDs
- The result was BetaGeneral(1.9531, 2.3592, 2550.00, 3425.00). Min=2550 Max=3425

- The pdf for HDDs is used to define the weather inpact factor.
- Fw = exp[ e ln( HDDt / 0HDDt ) ]
- 0HDDt is normal weather HDD.
- HDDt is Beta General distributed HDD with mean = normal weather HDD.
- e = is the elasticity of Load with respect to HDD.
(0.37 for residential, 0.05 for Commercial, not applied to Industrial)

- This weather impact factor does not expand with time as do the factors for GDP and Price.

- 0DSM(t) = Reference case forecast of DSM savings.
- The Monte Carlo Model gives these savings the following probability density function:
DSM(t) = RiskTriang(75%,100%,125%)*0DSM(t)

then load after DSM is calculated by subtraction.

LOADafter(t) = LOADbefore(t) – DSM(t)

- The residual impact factor is :
FU (t) = FU (t-1) * (1 + RiskTriang(-0.2%,0.0%,0.2%) )

- Standard Linear Regression Model
- y = X b + u
- where:y is vector of data for dependent variable (Nx1).
X data matrix for independent variables (Nxk).

u is normal with zero mean and st. dev s (Nx1).

- In the Estimation Period X is non-stochastic and there are N data points.
- Estimator of b is b = (X’X)-1X’y = b + (X’X)-1X’u
- b is normally distributed because u is.
- Estimator of y is ŷ = X b

- A regression of Sales on GDP was estimated by OLS.
- The results are graphed on the next slide.
- BC Hydro’s Base Case Forecast is shown for comparison.

- In the Standard Regression Model, the predictor variables are assumed to be non-stochastic.
- This assumption is O.K. for estimating the model in the historical estimation period. Here data are “actuals”.
- But in the Forecast Period, predictor variables are uncertain. They need to be modeled by random variables.
- What is needed is a formula for prediction intervals that is valid when predictor variables are random variables.
- The following three slides outline how one such formula can be derived.

- In Forecasting Period (t=1,…,T):
- Predictor Variables X are Stochastic.
- Let X = Z + V where Z = E[X], the mean of X.
- The model isy = Z b + u = Z b + (V b + u).
- Assume that Z is a matrix of given non-stochastic forecasts of the predictor variables and
- V is modeled so that Vt j ~ N(0, st j ) and
- Predictor variables and the error term { V, u } are a set of independent random variables.
- That is, Vt j and Vs k and ut are all independent unless indices t = t and j = k.

- The estimator (Forecast) of y is:
- ŷ = Z b where b = (X’X)-1X’y
- Under our strong assumptions the prediction error
- y - ŷ is normally distributed with
- Var ( y0 - ŷ0 ) = s2u Z(X’X)-1Z’ + s2uI
+ diag{ Σk1 b2js2 t j + s2u Σk1gjs2tj }

Prediction Intervals ( P10 to P90) are:

| y - ŷ | = 1.28 Sqrt (Var ( y0 - ŷ0 ) )

- In the case of one predictor variable (and constant) the prediction variance reduces to:
- Var ( y0 - ŷ0 ) = s2u { 1 + (1/n) + (Z - Xsm )2 / SST }
+ b2s2t + s2u s2t / SST

- Where Xsm is the mean of X in the estimation period (non-stochastic)

- This equation was used to construct the Confidence Bands graphed on a subsequent slide.

- Confidence Bands were also produced by the Monte Carlo methodology explained previously.
- A third set of Confidence Bands was produced using only the first 3 terms of the prediction variance equation. These bands are due to coefficient estimation and residual error only.
- Note that:
- The Monte Carlo and Prediction Formula Bands are Very Close.
- The third set of bands are small compared to the others, showing that uncertainty in the predictor variables in the forecast period is the main source of error in forecasted Load.
- This is true for a “good” regression, like the one considered here, where in the prediction interval formula, SST is large compared to the other terms.

- BC Hydro’s Monte Carlo Model and its implementation using @RISK was described.
- It provides a method for generating a stochastic forecast of the various components of BC Hydro’s Load.
- The results are reasonably accurate and have survived regulatory scrutiny for several years.
- Confidence bands resulting from the Monte Carlo Model and from an econometric prediction interval formula were calculated and compare. They are close to each other.