1 / 16

Compliance Data ISES Small Group Sesson December 2011

Compliance Data ISES Small Group Sesson December 2011. Purpose. To review multi-year compliance data from SESR and VR monitoring in order to: Identify additional data questions Discuss preliminary priorities Start thinking about possible improvement activities.

dai
Download Presentation

Compliance Data ISES Small Group Sesson December 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Compliance DataISES Small Group SessonDecember 2011

  2. Purpose • To review multi-year compliance data from SESR and VR monitoring in order to: • Identify additional data questions • Discuss preliminary priorities • Start thinking about possible improvement activities

  3. Annual Collection and Analysis of District Information Activities Local Plans – Annual Budget and Service Plans (SELPA) Student Level Data - Compliance testing Ongoing Compliance History – Triage process State Performance Plan Indicators – Calculation and review of district data Compliance Determinations Disproportionality Scope Every school district is reviewed every year.

  4. Special Education Self Reviews Scope Every school district participates every four years Activities SELPA/District conducted Monitoring Plan Parent Input SPP Indicators Compliance History Record Review Ed. Benefit IEP Implementation Policy and Procedure Review SELPA Governance Findings and Corrective Action Plans CDE Follow up Visits

  5. Verification Reviews Scope Juvenile Court Schools and other districts per Triage Process Activities CDE conducted Monitoring Plan Parent Input SPP Indicators & other Data Compliance History Record Review Ed. Benefit IEP Implementation Staff and Parent Interviews Policy and Procedure Review SELPA Governance Findings and Corrective Action Plans Follow up Visits

  6. Facilitated District Reviews Scope Districts who have Significant Disproportionality or Disproportionate Representation Activities Begins with Review of Policies, Procedures and Practices 2 year support In depth programmatic and data review CEIS Plan Speciality Expert Support

  7. Analyze Results, Submit CAPs, Track Correction Prepare Monitoring Plan Conduct Monitoring Activities • Training • Statewide SELPA Level Training • Local Training Modules • Overview • Software Installation • Monitoring Plan Development • Student Record Reviews • Policy and Procedure Reviews • Entering Findings • Systemic Findings, CAs and Reporting • Follow-up and Correction Record Review Activities Enter and Evaluate Findings Educational Benefit Review Activities Develop Corrective Actions Policy and Procedure Review Activities • Submit Findings and Corrective Actions for Review • Electronic data through secure portal • CDE review files for completeness, accuracy, and coherency IEP Implementation Monitoring Implementation of Local Plan Preparation and Planning • Document/Track Corrections • Submit through secure portal Monitoring Plan Development Other monitoring activities identified in the Monitoring Plan • Conduct Follow up Reviews • Initiate other enforcement activities, as needed Parent Input Meeting/Survey Review District Data Monitoring Plan Written and Submitted for Approval Close Based on Evidence of Correction Monitoring Plan Approved Special Education Self Review Process

  8. Total Students and Districts Reviewed through VR and SESR 2006-07 through 2009-10

  9. Most Frequent Findings from VR and SESR 2006-07 through 2010-11

  10. Noncompliance Items by SPP Indicator 2006-07 through 2009-10

  11. Number of Districts having one or more NC findings by SPP/APR Indicator 2006-07 through 2009-10

  12. Items Associated with SPP/APR Indicator 5 – Least Restrictive Environment (including total findings by item and total of districts found noncompliant 2006-07 through 2009-10)

  13. Finding Statements related to Item 3-4-1.2 – General Education Teacher in the IEP meeting.

  14. Finding statements related to Item 3-4-1.2 – Explanation of the extent to which the student will not participate with general education students in the general education classroom and in extracurricular and nonacademic activities

  15. National Comparison Least Restrictive Environment

  16. National Comparisons – Graduation Rate and Drop Out Rate

More Related