1 / 29

A G H 2010

A G H 2010. Badania Polowe. Teoria , Metodologia i Praktyka. Profesor Zdzis ł aw Bieniawski. “Idea” #1. Badania polowe w Geoinżynierii. Plate jacking tests. Another well-known in situ test. Large Flat Jack (LFJ) test.

Download Presentation

A G H 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A G H 2010 BadaniaPolowe Teoria, Metodologia iPraktyka Profesor Zdzisław Bieniawski

  2. “Idea” #1 Badania polowe w Geoinżynierii

  3. Plate jacking tests

  4. Another well-known in situ test Large Flat Jack (LFJ) test

  5. Other types of large in situ testsTri-axial block test Coal mine pillar test

  6. RMR versus Rock Mass Modulus Em from penetrometer tests (Galera 2005)

  7. RMR versus ratio Emass/Eintact(penetrometer data after Galera 2005)

  8. Rock mass deformation Modulus (GPa) EMASS = 10[(RMR - 10)/40]and for RMR > 50: EMASS = 2RMR – 100 Latest correlations (Galera 2008): EMASS= 147 e[(RMR - 100)/24] - 0.2RMR Alternatively for RMR < 50: EMASS= 0.09RMR and for RMR > 50: EMASS = 0.09 RMR + 1.06 (RMR-50) + 0.015(RMR-50)2 Correlation coefficient: R = 0.89.

  9. Rock Mass Modulus versus RMR and Q (check correlation)

  10. Rock Mass Strength Kalamaras, 1995

  11. Rock mass deformation Modulus Another correlation by Galera 2008: EMASS= Eintacte[(RMR - 100)/36] For full range of RMR

  12. Rock mass strength (MPa) sMASS = sc intacte[(RMR - 100)/24]Kalamaras [1995] As per the last correlation of Galera 2008: EMASS= E intacte[(RMR - 100)/36] it follows: EMsM Eisc 2/3

  13. concerning Rock Mass Strength W a r n i n g ! This expression: EMsM Eisc is preferable to the Hoek – Brown criterion in which: m/mi= e[(RMR - 100)/28]ands= e[(RMR - 100)/9] Due to uncertainty of mi values and equating RMR with GSI 2/3

  14. Example of needed Rock Mechanics focus Mechanized excavation in Mining and Tunneling deserves special attention in Rock Mechanics today Consider the case of TBM tunneling: determination of rock mass excavability (TBM rate of advance)

  15. World Record! The largest Tunnel Boring Machine (T B M) cannot function without Rock Mechanics!

  16. Ratings for Rock Mass Excavability index (RME): Input parameters

  17. Roof Span versus Stand Up Time as function of RMR and Q

  18. Correlation between Rock Mass Excavability index (RME) and Average Rate of Advance (m/day) for Double Shield TBMs

  19. Double Shield TBMs σci < 45 MPa

  20. “Idea” #3 Maszyny tarczowe T B M

More Related