Loading in 5 sec....

The design of elliptical cavitiesPowerPoint Presentation

The design of elliptical cavities

- 179 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

The design of elliptical cavities

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The design ofellipticalcavities

Gabriele Costanza

- To design a cavityweneedtocharacterize it from an electromagnetic and mechanicalpointofview

- Manufacturing, cleaning, testing
- Chemicalpolishing: Buffered ChemicalPolishing or Electrop-polishing. Removes a damagedsurfacelayer (dueto the manufacturing process) and reducesroughness.
- Heat treatment: removes H from the
- Rinsingwithhighpressure, ultrapure water

- Design = optimizationof the shapeof the cavitywithrespectto a set of parameters
- RF parameters
- Mechanical parameters

- The medium βcavity has 5 cells and operates in the TM01πmode.
- The longitudinal E-field has a 180 phaseshift from one cell to the next so that the particlesexperiencealways an acceleratingfield. The lengthofeach cell is then:

Multicell structures:

- Less expensive/m !!
- Fewer couplers, easierphasing…..

- Advantagesofsingle cell structures:
- No fieldflattness problem
- Easierto damp HOMS
- The input coupler transfers less power
- Easiertomanufacture and clean

- The simplestmodelof an acceleratingcavity = pillbox
- Let’sconsider a pillboxofradius a and length h.
- To find the fieldsof the accelerating mode (TM010) weneedtosolve the transverse problem:
- and the longitudinal problem:
- The solution consists in the eigenmodes
and eigenvalues.

- The accelerating (fundamental) mode is the
(TM010):

- The dispersion relation is:

- For the TM010 mode toresonate
at 704.42 MHz, a=16.29 cm

The design of elliptical cavities

RF parameters

- With the fieldswecancalculateseveralquantities:
- Stored Energy:
- Power Dissipated:
- part of the energystored in the cavity is dissipated on the walls

- Power exchangedwith the
external circuit:

- Power extracted by the HOM
coupler or injected by the FPC

- Power extracted by the HOM

port

- Intrinsicqualityfactor Q0:
- Measuresofhowquickly the energystored in the cavity is lost by dissipation in the cavitywalls.
- ExternalqualityfactorQext:
- Measureshowquickly the energystored in the cavity is radiatedthrough the ports
.

- Geometricfactor:
- Measuresofthe energylost by dissipation in the cavitywallsconsidering a Rsurfof 1 ohm.
- The surfaceresistanceof SC structurescan be modeledwith:
- The residualresistance is almostconstantwithtemperature and is a measureof the qualityof the material. The clearner the surface, and the purer the metal, the lower is the residualresistance.
- The BCS resitancegrowsveryquicklywith the frequency and decreasesexponentiallywith the temperature.

- We define the R/Q as:
- Where:
is a measureofhowefficient the cavityacceleratesthebeam,

- a large R/Q impliesthatlittleenergy is requiredtoproduce a large acceleration, therefore the R/Q is a measure on howefficient the energyexchangebetween a mode and the beam is (beamcouplingimpedance)
- R/Qdoes not depend on the material of the cavity.

- The higher the parameter:
the higher the acceleratingvoltagewithrespectto the powerdissipated

- Peak Fields:
- Epk/Eacc , whereEpkis the peakelectricfield on the surfaceof the cavityand
- Bpk/Eacc [mT/(MV/m)], whereBpk is the peakmagneticfield on the surfaceof the cavity.

- Cell to Cell CouplingKcc:
- It’s a measureof the widthof a band. It’susuallycalculatedonly for the fundamental passband.
- It’simportanttohave a high cell-to-cell couplingbecause:
- It’seasiertoobtain a highfieldflattness, that is, field is moreevenamong cells
- enhancedfrequency separation between the 4π/5 and the π modes
- HOMsarebettercoupledto the outer cells and possiblyextracted by an antenna

- Rf parameters summary:
,

theseare not the only parameters totakeintoaccount…

- The end cells and the inner cells are different because the outer cells areconnectedto the beamtubes, so I considerthemseparately
- Let’stake a look at geometryof the inner cell:
- 6geometric parameters:
- A,B = radiusesof the major ellipse
- a,b = radiusesof the smallerellipse
- Riris = the radiusof the iris
- D = the diameter of the cell is a tuning parameter

- 6geometric parameters:
- The end cells addother 5 parameters (for symmetriccavities)

The design of elliptical cavities

Mechanical parameters

- Assume a wallthicknessof 3.6 mm
- CavityStiffness [KN/mm]: 1 KN is applied at one end, the other end is grounded. The displacement is calculated
- TuningSensitivityΔf/Δz [KHz/mm]: a displacementof 1 mm is imposed at one end, the other end is grounded. The new frequencyof the π mode is calculated.

1 KN

- PressureSensitivity [Hz/mbar]: vibrations coming from varioussources cause the detuningof the cavity. The major contributor is the variation of the helium pressure. In this simulation a uniform pressureof 1 mbar is appliedto the external boundary. The frequencyshift is calculated. Bothendsaregrounded

- Lorentz DetuningCoefficient [Hz/(MV/m) 2]: The Lorentz Detuning Coefficient is defined as
- The frequency detuning is caused by the EM pressure on the cavitywalls. The pressure is
- Bothendsaregrounded

The design of elliptical cavities

Design

- The radiusof the iris is a verypowerfulvariableto trim the RF parameters
- All the other parameters have a ”second order” influcence
- Toomany parameters to design an entirecavity all at once
- Design flow:
- All the cells are designed with COMSOL. I wrote a codetoexploreonesectionof the parameter space at a time. The codelaunches COMSOL tosimulate the structure,tunes the cell to 704 MHz and calculates the RF parameters. The mechanical simulations areperformedonly on the full cavity.
- Thereare 5 RF parameters, the optimal choice is not obvious! (tradeoffs)

RF Parameter calculation & selectionof the best geometry

RF Parameter calculation & selectionof the best geometry

Inner cell

cavity

end cell

- All the parmeters areconnectedbetweeneachother and it’s not clearwhat the ”best solution” is
- For example:

Kcc

Peak Fields

Riris

R/Q

G

Highpeakfieldscan limit the maximum achievable gradient

- A ”tall” minor ellipseleadsto a lowerelectricpeakfield (αincreases).

- A ”large” major ellipseleadsto a lowermagneticpeakfield

- B has littleinfluence on the RF properties.

- The same appliesto the outer cells butit’shardertoachieve the same performancedueto the beamtube

- The optimizingcode…

- The optimizingcode…

The design of elliptical cavities

Results

63_2+31

63+2

57_2+20

largerdomeellipse=>higherKcc

Found in ”Medium βEllipticalCavity – CyromoduleTechnologyDemonstrator”. S. Molloy

Canweusehigher gradients?

Courtesyof Paolo Pierini, HPSL Workshop

Lower beta => lower R/Q

=> SmallerRiris

SPL CDR II

4.5 cm Riristoincrease

The R/Q but a lower beta

LeadstohigherKcc

63+2

63+2

63+2

- The cavitiestendtohavebetterperformances for β>βg

63+2

The cavities must be tunedtoobtain a highfieldflattness

63+2

57_2+20

57_2+20

57_2+20

57_2+20

63_2+31

63_2+31

63_2+31

63_2+31

63_2+31

The design of elliptical cavities

Bonus Section(ifyou’re not toobored….)

SLUT, TACK

All HOMswiththeir R/Q’sare

calculatedupto 3 GHz.

Studyof the HOMsstarted

2.111337 GHz

Two modes closeto6f0 :

f0 = 352.21 MHz

2.11135 GHz

Does this mode reallyexist?

βg

The lowe the numberof cells, the higher the maximum Eacc. The maximum is not obtained at the geometric beta

The higher the numberof cells, the lower the energy / velocityacceptancebut 4 cell cavitiesleadtolonger accelerator & more€

Cryostat FillingFactor = Cryostatacceleratingefficiency

=

βg =0.69

Is a higherβg better?

6 cavitiesper cryo

βg =0.67

5cavities per cryo

4 cavities per cryo

βg =0.65

2 m

1 m

10 cm

15 cm

βg

- Higherβg => widerenergy/velocityacceptance, higherinjectionenergy => morespokes. Aretheymoreefficient / less expensivethanellipticalcavities?
- If not it’spossibletouse ”few” βg = 0.65 ell. cavities (lowerinjectionenergy) and morehighβcavitieswhicharemoreefficientthanβg = 0.67 cavities
- Lowerβg => lowerperformances (butit’spossibletofind a goodcompromise). Cavities for βg<1 have a smallervolume, for the same frequency, w.r.t βg=1 cavities, and lowerEaccbecauseof the reducedlength => higherpeakfields

63_2+31

63+2

2

63

57_2+20

57_2

20

63_2+31

63_2

31