E N D
2. III.1 Using Point-of-Use Systems to Implement Demand Pull Inventory
3. Using Point-of-Use Systems to Implement Demand Pull Inventory Bill Mosser, CMRP
Managing Director- Supply Chain Services
Temple University Health System
Philadelphia, PA
4. Discussion Points Who is Temple University Health System?
TUHS Supply Chain Strategy
TUHS Inventory Management
Demand Pull Inventory Model
Point of Use Systems
Pharmacy Pilot
Hospital Supply Pilot
Next Steps
Q&A
5. TUHS 5 Hospital System (non-profit) in Northeast Philadelphia
Temple University Hospital (671 beds)
Temple University Childrens Medical Center (68 beds)
Jeanes Hospital (197 beds)
Northeastern Hospital (200 beds)
Episcopal Campus (Behavioral Health Center & 24 beds)
$140 million spend in Supplies & Pharmaceuticals
System Goals
Employer of Choice
Premier Healthcare System within our market
2% operating margin on healthcare operations
6. Healthcare Operations Snapshot Press Ganey Scores - The Health Systems composite score for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 was 82.5 and we ranked at the 27th percentile. Currently our score is 84.6 and we have moved to the 64th percentile.
Operations Improvement program Achieved $42.2 million which exceeded our 2005 budgeted target of $33.5 million. When added to our 2004 realized initiatives of $14.1 million the 2005 cumulative annual value achieved through our Operations Improvement Initiative was $56.4 million.
We make considerable use of the Solucient Benchmarking data to evaluate our expense performance. While we continue to strive for improvement our efforts to date have been successful. Our supply and pharmaceutical costs at our general med-surg hospitals benchmark at or better than the 25th percentile. Labor costs at Temple University Hospital are also at the 25th percentile. The community hospitals are working to bring their labor costs to within the 25th percentile.
Information technology investments are necessary for us to achieve a better level of clinical and operational effectiveness. Our seven year technology plan calls for an investment of approximately $186.0 million and will be focused in those areas that will allow us to redefine our processes and cost structure.
Medical Staff development strategies are focused on a better alignment between the physicians and the hospital to emphasize our surgical programs.
Prior to FY2004, the Supply Chain was decentralized and independent
Supply Chain Goals
Reduce operating expenses by $27-32 million by FY2006
Improve service & quality through improved relationships
Develop capability within 18 months or buy it
7. TUHS Supply Chain Strategy Our three year strategy is to convert from the traditional decentralized, vendor driven, reactive model with different contracts, catalogs and processes to a system wide integrated supply chain complete with Demand Pull, Vendor Owned Inventory, Supply Formulary driven model with full contract compliance .Our three year strategy is to convert from the traditional decentralized, vendor driven, reactive model with different contracts, catalogs and processes to a system wide integrated supply chain complete with Demand Pull, Vendor Owned Inventory, Supply Formulary driven model with full contract compliance .
8. TUHS Supply Chain Strategy Weve taken a building block approach focusing our initial efforts on developing the infrastructure to sustain an expanded and long term strategy. The green blocks have been completed. The yellow blocks are in the development and implementation staged for FY2006,. The gray boxes represent our future plans to complete the integration process.Weve taken a building block approach focusing our initial efforts on developing the infrastructure to sustain an expanded and long term strategy. The green blocks have been completed. The yellow blocks are in the development and implementation staged for FY2006,. The gray boxes represent our future plans to complete the integration process.
9. Expensive, manually intensive activities
Multiple product handling activities
Excessive inventory carrying costs
Lack of information sharing
Minimal cooperation among supply chain entities
Poor fill rates
Operations focus vs. focus on customer needs
Stock versus non-stock
KPIs
25th % or better in Supply $ as % of NPR & TOE; and per APD
75th % in Supply $ per AD
Inventory $$
Too much on the shelves Proliferation of New Products
Back Door Purchasing
50% of total purchasing w/o POs
Contracts are Missing
<60% of Supply Contracts
<25% of Purchased Services
Deliveries Bypass Receiving
Procurement Controls are Lacking
10. FY04 Year End Inventory Levels
11. Supply Variety Too many varieties
Too many vendors
Different prices at each hospital
Stock versus Non-stock ordering confusion
Training on new products
12. Logistics Maze Finding someones order
Transferring supplies to another facility
Tracking Deliveries from Outside
Who to call to resolve problems?
Waiting for return calls
13. Internal Delivery Services Who delivers what?
When do they deliver?
How long till next delivery occurs?
Bottom Line: We have redundant delivery staff services that few understand
14. End User Issues Multiple Bulk Warehouses
Multiple Storerooms
Direct from Vendor Philosophy
Who handles my stat needs?
Who to call for pickup & delivery?
Where can I store my equipment?
Who do I call for Service?
15. TUHS Supply Distribution Chain
16. Pharmaceutical distribution process Typically there are more than 19 steps in a typical hospital pharmaceutical distribution process (if possible, customize for customer)Typically there are more than 19 steps in a typical hospital pharmaceutical distribution process (if possible, customize for customer)
17. Med/Surg distribution process Typically there are more than 20 steps in a hospital med-surg distribution process (if possible, customize for customer)
Typically there are more than 20 steps in a hospital med-surg distribution process (if possible, customize for customer)
18.
19. How do we Resolve? One company. One solution. One source. Cardinal Health.
One company. One solution. One source. Cardinal Health.
20. Demand Pull Vision To create a Business Model that will allow access to data across the entire supply chain from point of manufacture to point of use, thus creating a seamless flow of product, information and cash that will have products available at point of use when required, through multiple delivery channels, at the lowest cost.
21. TUHS Supply Chain Vision Effectively Integrated
23. Clinical Staff Involvement in Supply Chain LogisticSource can reduce the supply chain steps of pharmaceuticals & supplies by more than 70%
LogisticSource can reduce the supply chain steps of pharmaceuticals & supplies by more than 70%
25. Value Proposition Establish Framework for TUHS to gain full control over:
Non-Wage Data Integrity Challenges across the health system
Contract Management
Product Management
Procurement Cycle
Point of Use Inventory Utilization
Supply Distribution & Logistics Efficiencies
Implement Tools and Improvements to drive and sustain savings
Complement or replace existing Business and Technology investments
Allow TUHS to provide a best practice supply distribution model
Monitor & track progress on an on-going basis
34. ANY QUESTIONS??