Download Presentation

Loading in 3 Seconds

This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.

X

Sponsored Links

- 79 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Panos Ipeirotis - Introduction

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- New York University, Stern School of Business

“A Computer Scientist in a Business School”

http://behind-the-enemy-lines.blogspot.com/

Email: [email protected]

- Need a large number of hand-labeled sites
- Get people to look at sites and classify them as:
G (general audience)PG (parental guidance) R(restricted)X (porn)

- Cost/Speed Statistics
- Undergrad intern: 200 websites/hr, cost: $15/hr

- Need a large number of hand-labeled sites
- Get people to look at sites and classify them as:
G (general audience)PG (parental guidance) R(restricted)X (porn)

- Cost/Speed Statistics
- Undergrad intern: 200 websites/hr, cost: $15/hr
- MTurk: 2500 websites/hr, cost: $12/hr

- Worker ATAMRO447HWJQ
- labeled X (porn) sites as G (general audience)

- Get multiple, redundant labels using multiple workers
- Pick the correct label based on majority vote

11 workers

93% correct

1 worker

70% correct

- Probability of correctness increases with numberof workers
- Probability of correctness increases with quality of workers

- Single Vote Statistics
- MTurk: 2500 websites/hr, cost: $12/hr
- Undergrad: 200 websites/hr, cost: $15/hr

- 11-vote Statistics
- MTurk: 227 websites/hr, cost: $12/hr
- Undergrad: 200 websites/hr, cost: $15/hr

- Look at our spammer friend ATAMRO447HWJQ together with other 9 workers

- We can compute error rates for each worker
- Error rates for ATAMRO447HWJQ
- P[X → X]=9.847%P[X → G]=90.153%
- P[G → X]=0.053%P[G → G]=99.947%

Our “friend” ATAMRO447HWJQmainly marked sites as G.Obviously a spammer…

Random answers error rate = 50%

Average error rate for ATAMRO447HWJQ: 45.2%

- P[X → X]=9.847%P[X → G]=90.153%
- P[G → X]=0.053%P[G → G]=99.947%
Action: REJECT and BLOCK

Results:

- Over time you block all spammers
- Spammers learn to avoid your HITS
- You can decrease redundancy, as quality of workers is higher

- Spam keeps quality down
- Without spam, workers are of higher quality
- Need less redundancy for same quality
- Same quality of results for lower cost

Without spam

5 workers

94% correct

Without spam

1 worker

80% correct

With spam

11 workers

93% correct

With spam

1 worker

70% correct

- Classifying sites as G, PG, R, X
- Sometimes workers are careful but biased
- Classifies G → P and P → R
- Average error rate for ATLJIK76YH1TF: too high

- Error Rates for CEO of AdSafe
- P[G → G]=20.0%P[G → P]=80.0%P[G → R]=0.0%P[G → X]=0.0%
- P[P → G]=0.0%P[P → P]=0.0%P[P → R]=100.0%P[P → X]=0.0%
- P[R → G]=0.0%P[R → P]=0.0%P[R → R]=100.0%P[R → X]=0.0%
- P[X → G]=0.0%P[X → P]=0.0%P[X → R]=0.0%P[X → X]=100.0%

Is she a spammer?

- Error Rates for Worker: ATLJIK76YH1TF
- P[G → G]=20.0%P[G → P]=80.0%P[G → R]=0.0%P[G → X]=0.0%
- P[P → G]=0.0%P[P → P]=0.0%P[P → R]=100.0%P[P → X]=0.0%
- P[R → G]=0.0%P[R → P]=0.0%P[R → R]=100.0%P[R → X]=0.0%
- P[X → G]=0.0%P[X → P]=0.0%P[X → R]=0.0%P[X → X]=100.0%

- For ATLJIK76YH1TF, we simply need to “reverse the errors” (technical details omitted) and separate error and bias
- True error-rate ~ 9%

Demo and Open source implementation available at:

http://qmturk.appspot.com

- Input:
- Labels from Mechanical Turk
- Cost of incorrect labelings (e.g., XG costlier than GX)

- Output:
- Corrected labels
- Worker error rates
- Ranking of workers according to their quality

- Beta version, more improvements to come!
- Suggestions and collaborations welcomed!

- Human labor is expensive, even when paying cents
- Need to scale crowdsourcing
- Basic idea: Build a machine learning model and use it instead of humans

Data from existing

crowdsourced answers

New Case

Automatic Model(through machine learning)

Automatic

Answer

Get more data Improve model accuracy

Improve data quality Improve classification

Example Case: Porn or not?

Data Quality = 100%

Data Quality = 80%

Data Quality = 60%

Data Quality = 50%

20

- Use machine when confident, humans otherwise
- Retrain with new human input → improve model → reduce need for humans

Automatic

Answer

Confident

New Case

Automatic Model(through machine learning)

Not confident

Get human(s) to answer

Data from existing

crowdsourced answers

Get more data Improve model accuracy

Improve data quality Improve classification

Example Case: Porn or not?

Data Quality = 100%

Data Quality = 80%

Data Quality = 60%

Data Quality = 50%

22

- Use machine when confident, humans otherwise
- Ask as many humans as necessary to ensure quality

Automatic

Answer

Confident

New Case

Automatic Model(through machine learning)

Not confident for quality?

Not confident

Data from existing

crowdsourced answers

Get human(s) to answer

Confident for quality?

“A Computer Scientist in a Business School”

http://behind-the-enemy-lines.blogspot.com/

Email: [email protected]