1 / 11

U.S. Government---Unit 1 Power Point Foundations and Constitutional Principles…

U.S. Government---Unit 1 Power Point Foundations and Constitutional Principles…. MAJOR POLITICAL IDEAS IN HISTORY. -Laws of nature and of nature’s God – phrase found in the Declaration of Independence; includes standards of justice which transcend laws made by humans; also called natural law

cyndi
Download Presentation

U.S. Government---Unit 1 Power Point Foundations and Constitutional Principles…

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. U.S. Government---Unit 1 Power Point • Foundations and Constitutional Principles…

  2. MAJOR POLITICAL IDEAS IN HISTORY -Laws of nature and of nature’s God – phrase found in the Declaration of Independence; includes standards of justice which transcend laws made by humans; also called natural law -Unalienable rights – rights that may not be surrendered or taken from individuals. The Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson, stated “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Jefferson was inspired by the writings of John Locke’s natural rights of “life, liberty, and property.” -Divine right of kings – belief that monarchs were chosen by God, giving the monarch unlimited authority -Social contract theory – in order for man to live in groups, he must give up some of his freedom to the government in exchange for protection of his natural rights. The idea was developed by Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan, expanded by John Locke in Second Treatise on Government, and by Jean Jacques Rousseau in Social Contract. The authority of government is derived from the consent of the governed. The citizens could challenge a government that does not preserve their natural rights. (e.g., Glorious Revolution in England and American struggle for independence) -Right of resistance to illegitimate government – a principle stated in the Declaration of Independence: people have a right to create a government to protect their rights, and governments are established for the limited purposes of securing individual rights; authority is derived from the consent of the governed and people have the right to alter or abolish government when it fails to fulfill its purpose.

  3. MAJOR INTELLECTUAL, PHILOSOPHICAL, POLITICAL, RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS THAT INFORMED THE AMERICAN FOUNDING • Judeo-Christian (especially biblical) law – emphasizes how both Jewish and Christian principles influenced the Founding Fathers’ personal beliefs about liberty, responsibility, hard work, ethics, justice, and equality. Many ideas from the Ten Commandments are reflected in the Bill of Rights. • English Common Law – used in the courts of England since the Middle Ages, common law is based on custom, usages, and general principles found in court decisions that serve as precedents to be applied to situations not covered by statutory law. • Constitutionalism – the idea that the basic principles and laws of a government should be organized and administered through compliance with a written or unwritten constitution. The constitution effectively restrains the powers of the government and guarantees certain rights to the people. • The Enlightenment – an intellectual movement concentrated in France during the 1700s. A group of philosophers including John Locke, Baron de Montesquieu, and Voltaire, sought to apply the rigors of scientific inquiry to study human society. They developed rational laws to describe social behavior and applied their findings in support of human rights (natural rights) and liberal economic theories. • Republicanism – a philosophy of limited government with elected representatives serving at the will of the people; a belief that the only legitimate government is one based on the consent of the governed.

  4. THE INDIVIDUALS WHOSE PRINCIPLES OF LAWS AND GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS INFORMED THE AMERICAN FOUNDING DOCUMENTS • Moses– a Biblical religious leader, lawgiver, and prophet who received the Ten Commandments; many ideas in the Ten Commandments appear in the Bill of Rights. • William Blackstone – an English judge and professor who wrote the four-volume Commentaries on the Laws of England, in which he expressed his views on the common law of England. The four volumes included Rights of Persons, which describes the relationship between the government and the individual; Rights of Things, which explains the right of property; Private Wrongs, which deals with the law of torts or private complaints; and Public Wrongs, which focuses on crimes and punishments, including wrongs against God and religion. • John Locke – natural rights; life, liberty and property; strongest influence on Thomas Jefferson • Charles de Montesquieu – separation of powers and checks and balances to prevent one part of government from becoming too powerful

  5. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETroXvRFoKY

  6. CONTRIBUTIONS OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES OF FOUNDING FATHERS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF U.S. GOVERNMENT - Founding Father – Individual who played a major role in declaring U.S. independence, fighting the Revolutionary War, or writing and adopting the U.S. Constitution. • John Adams – Served in 1st and 2nd Continental Congress, led the debate that ratified the Declaration of Independence, served as vice president for 8 years under George Washington, and was elected the 2nd president of the United States in 1796. It is significant to note that he was not elected vice president but rather received the second most votes in the presidential election of 1788. He was a strong supporter of the Declaration of Independence and supported a bicameral legislature to prevent wealthy from dominating. • Alexander Hamilton – A New York delegate to the Continental Congresses and the Constitutional Convention. He was a leading Federalist, favored strong central government, and helped write the Federalist Papers. He was the first Secretary of the Treasury, during which time he established the Mint and the National Bank. He believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution. • Thomas Jefferson – Third president of the United States and author of the Declaration of Independence. He was an Anti-Federalist and supported a strong Bill of Rights. His opposition to a strong central government led to the creation of the first political parties. He was also a delegate to the Continental Congress. He did not take part in writing the Constitution because he was in France at the time. He was the first Secretary of State, taking Benjamin Franklin’s place as Minister to France; he approved the Louisiana Purchase. • James Madison – Called the “Father of the Constitution” since his work was essential to the writing and ratification of the Constitution. One of the authors of the Federalist Papers, he supported a strong central government. He also wrote the first 12 amendments to the Constitution, 10 of which were ratified as the Bill of Rights. He was the fourth president of the United States. • John Jay – Served as Ambassador to Spain and France during and after the American Revolution, helping to shape foreign policy and securing favorable peace terms with the British. He was President of the Continental Congress from 1778 –1779 and 1789 –1795 and first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. He co-wrote the Federalist Papers with Hamilton and Madison, warning in four of the articles of the dangers of “foreign force and influence” on a weak central government. As Chief Justice, he established the precedent that the Court does not take positions on legislation as it is being considered when he declined a request from Alexander Hamilton to endorse a law that would have assumed the debts of the states. • George Mason – Known as the “Father of the Bill of Rights,” he was a delegate from Virginia to the Constitutional Convention. He was the leader of those who pressed the Convention for a clear statement protecting the rights of states’ and individuals from the powerful central government; when none was included in the original document, he refused to sign it. His efforts resulted in the addition of the Bill of Rights by the first Congress, based on the earlier Virginia Declaration of Rights, authored by Mason. His Virginia Declaration of Rights was also a model for the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, adopted in 1789. • Roger Sherman – One member of the Committee of Five that drafted the Declaration of Independence and also helped write the Articles of Confederation. A delegate from Connecticut to the Constitutional Convention who favored protection of states’ rights, he offered what came to be called the Great Compromise or Connecticut Compromise, which broke the stalemate between large and small states over state representation in the new Congress. His compromise proposed the current two-house legislative body, with all states represented equally in the Senate and by population in the House of Representatives. He also supported electing the President by an Electoral College. • James Wilson – Signer of the Declaration of Independence and twice elected to the Continental Congress, and was one of the most prominent legal scholars among the Founders. At the Constitutional Convention, he wanted representatives in Congress to be elected by popular vote. He proposed the Three-Fifths Compromise which counted slaves as three-fifths of a person in determining how many representatives a state would be allotted in the House of Representatives, thus breaking a deadlock between slave and free states. He later served as one of the first Justices on the new Supreme Court.

  7. DEBATES AND COMPROMISES THAT IMPACTED THE CREATION OF THE FOUNDING DOCUMENTS • Founding documents –Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights • Debates and compromises • Limited government – A government in which constitutions, statements of rights, or other laws define the limits of those in power. Everyone, including all authority figures, must obey the laws. This reduced the opportunity for those in positions of authority to take advantage of their elected, appointed, or inherited positions. • Republicanism – A philosophy of limited government with elected representatives serving at the will of the people. Supporters of republicanism believe that the only legitimate government is one based on the consent of the governed. This concept delayed the vote on Declaration of Independence. The delegates wanted unanimity in the vote for independence, but several delegations were originally directed by the people of their colonies not to vote for independence from Great Britain. • Popular Sovereignty –The concept that political power rests with the people who can create, alter, and abolish government. People express themselves through voting and free participation in government. Popular sovereignty is an important characteristic of democratic government. • Individual rights – Many opposed the Constitution in 1787 because they believed it did not offer adequate protection of individual rights. The first ten amendments, collectively known as the Bill of Rights and ratified in 1791, were created to correct this. The individual rights protected in the Bill of Rights include economic rights related to property, political rights related to freedom of speech and press, and personal rights related to bearing arms and maintaining private residences. • Federalism – The distribution of power between a federal government and the states within a union. Under the Articles of Confederation, most power had belonged to the states. Under the new Constitution, power was to be divided between the national and state governments. The 10th Amendment reserved to the states powers not granted to the national government, unless they were otherwise prohibited to the states. • Checks and balances – A political system in which each branch of government can limit the power of the other branches. According to the U.S. Constitution, each of the three branches of government has distinct powers that can be limited in certain ways by the other two branches. • Separation of powers – The concept of separating the powers of government between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. The branches created in the Constitution included the legislative branch (with power to make the laws), known as Congress and made up of a House of Representatives and a Senate; the executive branch (with power to carry out the laws) known as the President; and the judicial branch (with power to interpret laws) known as the Supreme Court. The delegates to the Philadelphia Convention felt that by separating the powers of government, the Constitution afforded protection to U.S. citizens from abuses of power by a centralized government.

  8. The Virginia Plan – A plan debated in the Constitutional Convention, written by James Madison and introduced by Edmund Randolph of the Virginia delegation. It proposed creation of a bicameral legislature (two-house legislature). Membership in the lower house was to be based on state population, and candidates were to be nominated and elected by the people of each state. Membership in the upper house was to be allocated in the same way, but candidates were to be nominated by the state legislatures and elected by the members of the lower house. The plan also proposed a government of three branches with a system of checks and balances as well as creating a system of federalism to divide power between the national and state governments. • The New Jersey Plan – A plan introduced by William Paterson of New Jersey in response to the Virginia Plan. Less populous states were afraid a population-based plan of legislative representation would result in their voices and interests being drowned out by the larger states. Many delegates also felt that the Convention did not have the authority to completely scrap the Articles of Confederation, as the Virginia Plan would have done. Paterson proposed a legislature consisting of a single house (unicameral legislature). Each state was to have equal representation in this body, regardless of population, with one vote per state. The plan would have left the Articles of Confederation in place, but would have amended them to somewhat increase the powers of Congress, recognizing that the states were independent entities and would remain so as they entered into the new government. • The Great Compromise – Also called the Connecticut Compromise because it was introduced by Roger Sherman of that state. It was a compromise between the Virginia and New Jersey plans for allocating representation in the legislative branch. In favor of the larger states, membership in the lower house, as in the Virginia Plan, was to be allocated in proportion to state population; candidates were to be nominated and elected by the people of each state. A census of all inhabitants of the United States was to be taken every 10 years. Also all bills for raising taxes, spending or appropriating money were to originate in the lower house. In exchange, membership in the upper house was more similar to the New Jersey Plan and allocated two seats to each state, regardless of size, with members being chosen by the state legislatures. After eleven days of debate, the compromise passed by one vote five to four. • Three-Fifths Compromise – Addressed the issue of popular representation in the House of Representatives created by the Great Compromise. Less populous southern states were allowed to count three-fifths of all non-free, non-Native American people toward population counts and the distribution of taxes. Delegates opposed to slavery generally wished to count only the free inhabitants of each state when determining the number of representatives allocated to a state. Delegates supportive of slavery generally wanted to count slaves in their actual numbers. Since slaves could not vote, slaveholders would thus have the benefit of increased representation in the House and the Electoral College. The final compromise of counting slaves as only three-fifths of their actual numbers reduced the power of the slave states relative to the original southern proposals, but increased it over the northern position. The 13th Amendment rendered the Three-Fifths Clause moot. The debate over slavery had played a role in determining the final language of the Declaration of Independence as well. Jefferson has included in the original draft a section condemning George III for allowing the slave trade to flourish. This provision was deleted by the delegates during debate, keeping the southern colonies from walking out of the meeting. • Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists – Two sides in the arguments for and against ratification of the Constitution and the government the document created. Disagreements over the way the Constitution divided power between the states and the national government, the degree to which the rights of states were protected, and the degree to which the rights of citizens were protected led to furious debates as states held their conventions to vote on ratifying the new document. Those favoring ratification of the Constitution and adoption of the federalist form of government were called Federalists, and those opposed to the Constitution because they feared the power of the national government in the new federal system were called Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were also concerned that if the national government could overrule state decisions, the protection of the liberty of individuals would be at risk. Patrick Henry and George Mason were leading Anti-Federalists. Henry was so opposed to the process that he did not even attend the convention which drafted the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson favored some aspects of the Constitution but was concerned about the lack of protection for the rights of states and the absence of support for individual rights. He supported the inclusion of a Bill of Rights. In an effort to sway opinion and get the Constitution ratified, three leading Federalists (James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay) published their views in The Federalist, a series of 85 newspaper essays which have become a classic of American political thought.

  9. HOW THE FEDERALIST PAPERS EXPLAIN THE PRINCIPLES OF THE AMERICAN SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT • Federalist Papers – collection of essays written during the debates over ratification of the Constitution by John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton that promote a strong central government and describe a republican form of government. The principles they espouse are judicial review, limited government, checks and balances. • Federalist Number 10 – written by Madison; begins by stating the strong Constitution has the ability to control the violence and aggressions caused by factions, which cause instability in the government. It also says corruption in government will be less likely because representatives will be chosen by a large population. It describes the new republican form of government created by the Constitution and states the main goal of the new government is to make all states secure from threats and invasions. • Federalist Number 39 – written by Madison; begins by redefining the term "republic," stating three principles that must be present for a true republic to exist: the power to govern must be derived from the consent of the people; representatives elected from the people are the administrators of the government; the terms of service of the Representatives must be limited by time, good behavior, or as long as the favor of the people is maintained (as would be the case in impeachment) • Federalist Number 51 – written by Madison; addresses the means by which appropriate checks and balances can be created in government and also advocates a separation of powers within the national government. One of its most important ideas is the often quoted phrase, "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition."

  10. THE ROLE OF THE AMENDMENT PROCESS IN A CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT • Article 5 of the Constitution outlines the procedure for amendment processes to amend the Constitution: • Proposal by either 2/3 vote of each house of Congress or by a national convention requested by 2/3 of the state legislatures; • Ratification by 3/4 of the states in their legislatures or in state conventions • Amendments can be added by any combination of steps 1 and 2. • 26 of the 27 amendments have been made by a proposal in Congress and approved by the state legislatures. Only the 21st Amendment (repeal of Prohibition) was ratified by state conventions. • No national conventions have been called to propose an amendment. • The amendment process illustrates federalism in that the proposal is a national function and ratification if a state function. • Amendment might be proposed to address a perceived deficit in the Constitution (as in the Bill of Rights), in response to a particular court decision (11th Amendment in response to Chisholm v. Georgia ruling regarding lawsuits), or to advance a controversial social issue (18th Amendment and Prohibition).

  11. THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT WITH THE IDEA OF SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE • Free exercise clause – Clause in the First Amendment; “Congress shall make no law…prohibiting the free exercise…” of religion which has been interpreted to protect a person’s religious beliefs and the activities that flow from those beliefs, as long as they do not interfere with more important rights of society. • Establishment clause – Clause in the First Amendment; “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion…” and was meant to prevent the establishment of a national church. Beyond this ban on a national church, scholars and the courts continue to debate the meaning of the clause. Some believe it merely prevents the government from favoring one religion over another while others believe there should be a “wall of separation” between church and state. • Separation of church and state – These words do not appear in the Constitution, but stem from the ideas of James Madison and Thomas Jefferson calling for a “wall of separation” between church and state, meaning little or no connection between the two. • The Founding Fathers included protections for religious freedom in the First Amendment because of experiences with the Church of England, the national church of England, and because followers of other religions in England had suffered persecution. The Church of England was supported by government taxation and held significant political power. • Article VI of the Constitution – “…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office of public trust under the United States;” meant no government official had to swear to hold certain religious beliefs before being allowed to hold office; added to prevent a single church from holding power over government as was the case with the Church of England. • When the First Amendment was added, five states had “established” or “official” churches. The First Amendment applied only to Congress, the national legislature. • Fourteenth Amendment –The due process and equal protection rights stated in this amendment have been interpreted by the Supreme Court to mean that states may not establish religions or unreasonably interfere with a person’s free exercise of religion.

More Related