1 / 35

Multnomah County Student Achievement 2000-2008

Multnomah County Student Achievement 2000-2008. Presented to the Leaders Roundtable November 25, 2008 Source: Oregon Department of Education, Dr. Patrick Burk. The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).

cybil
Download Presentation

Multnomah County Student Achievement 2000-2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Multnomah County Student Achievement2000-2008 Presented to the Leaders Roundtable November 25, 2008 Source: Oregon Department of Education, Dr. Patrick Burk

  2. The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) • The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what America's students know and can do in various subject areas. • Assessments are conducted periodically in mathematics, reading, science, writing, the arts, civics, economics, geography, and U.S. history. Assessments in world history and in foreign language are anticipated in 2012. • NAEP assessments are administered uniformly using the same sets of test booklets across the nation. • NAEP results serve as a common metric for all states and selected urban districts. The assessment stays essentially the same from year to year, with only carefully documented changes. This permits NAEP to provide a clear picture of student academic progress over time. • In 2007 Oregon assessed 3500 students in 140 schools for NAEP.

  3. National Assessment of Educational Progress—Oregon: 2007 READING GRADE 8 National Average 261 266 Oregon Average

  4. National Assessment of Educational Progress—Oregon: 2007 Grade 4 Mathematics National Average 239 236 Oregon Average

  5. National Assessment of Educational Progress—Oregon: 2007 Grade 8 Mathematics National Average 280 284 Oregon Average

  6. National Assessment of Educational Progress—Oregon: 2007 WHAT’S NEXT? NAEP will be administered in High Schools between January 26 and March 6, 2009 to a sample of twelfth-grade students. Students will be assessed in either mathematics, reading, or science. In a small number of schools, NAEP will conduct field tests in civics, geography, and U.S. history to prepare for future assessments, and special studies of hands-on science tasks and interactive computer tasks in science.

  7. US Census

  8. Multnomah County SAT and AP2008 • Average SAT Scores in Multnomah County • 2147 Students took the SAT Reasoning Test • 435.77 Reading; 440.35 Math; 417.88 Writing • Range in Multnomah County • Reading: 380-581; Math:395-580; Writing: 366-561 • State Average • 518 Reading; 525 Math; 497 Writing • National Average • 497 Reading; 510 Math; 488 Writing • Participation in Advanced Placement in Multnomah County • 1499 Students took at least 1 AP Exam • 2637 AP exams were taken • 1310 exams scored 3 or better

  9. Part I: Academic Achievement Part II Part III

  10. Part I: Academic Achievement Part II Part III • ACT Recommended Coursework • ACT Minimum Core • English: 4 years Social Studies: At least 3 years • Mathematics: At least 3 years Natural Sciences: At least 3 years • ACT research suggests that students today do not have a reasonable chance of becoming ready for college unless they take additional higher-level courses beyond the minimum core, and even then they are not always likely to be ready for college. This finding is in part a reflection on the quality and intensity—the rigor—of the high school curriculum. • Without improving the quality and content of the core, it appears that most students need to take additional higher-level courses to learn what they should have learned from a rigorous core curriculum, with no guarantee even then that they will be prepared for college-level work.

  11. Part I: Academic Achievement Part II Part III

  12. Part II: Measuring College Readiness Part I Part III • ACT College Readiness Benchmark Scores Through collaborative research with postsecondary institutions nationwide, ACT has established the following College Readiness Benchmark Scores: • A benchmark score is the minimum score needed on an ACT subject area test to indicate a 50% chance of obtaining a B or higher or about a 75% chance of obtaining a C or higher in the corresponding credit-bearing college courses. College Readiness Benchmark Score English English Composition 18 Math Algebra 22 Reading Social Sciences 21 Science Biology 24 ACT Subject Area Test College Course(s)

  13. ENGLISH: Readiness for College English Composition Part II: Measuring College Readiness Part I Part III

  14. MATHEMATICS: Readiness for College Algebra Part II: Measuring College Readiness Part I Part III

  15. READING: Readiness for College Social Sciences Part II: Measuring College Readiness Part I Part III

  16. SCIENCE: Readiness for College Biology Part II: Measuring College Readiness Part I Part III

  17. Conclusions • Achievement Gap persists in Multnomah County, but improvement in grades 3 and 5. • Oregon performance on national assessments is at or above national averages, but is flat overall. • Participation and performance in Advanced Placement Exams continues to be a bright spot. • Clear evidence that participation in a rigorous core set of classes has a positive impact on performance and college readiness. Supports the Oregon Diploma. • Significant differences by ethnicity in participation in a rigorous core curriculum.

  18. WHAT IS THE BEST RESPONSE OF THE LEADERS ROUNDTABLE? • Consider the implication of a “Rigor Gap.” To what degree is access predicted by race? • Select a limited number of clear indicators and mobilize community response. • Pre-school and Full Day Kindergarten • 3rd grade benchmarks for all students • Rigorous and challenging class assignments • 8th grade transition benchmarks • Rigorous core curriculum in every high school for every student based on proficiency and including student support • Intervention plans at each grade level • Invest in teacher quality; university partnerships • Support PK-12 alignment to the new diploma requirements as target objectives

More Related