1 / 25

Superintendent’s House – Glencoe St.

Superintendent’s House – Glencoe St. Dates vary – some estimate 1810. DHR 1987 Survey estimates 1880 DHR 1994 Survey estimates 1900-1920 1887 Norfolk County Survey indicates a structure at the present location of the Superintendent’s House

cutter
Download Presentation

Superintendent’s House – Glencoe St.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Superintendent’s House – Glencoe St.

  2. Dates vary – some estimate 1810. • DHR 1987 Survey estimates 1880 • DHR 1994 Survey estimates 1900-1920 • 1887 Norfolk County Survey indicates a structure at the present location of the Superintendent’s House • Letter from Leroy Edwards indicates possibility of house on Canal.

  3. Letter from Leroy Edwards, Toll-gatherer1865 • Re: occupying Federal forces: “The books of the office were taken from me, with the building which contained them….goods were carried through under military permits. I asked payment of tolls, which were refused. I tested my power to stop vessels, as in the case of the steamer Dolly.”

  4. Letter from Leroy Edwards, Toll-gatherer1865 • Re: occupying Federal forces: “The books of the office were taken from me, with the building which contained them….goods were carried through under military permits. I asked payment of tolls, which were refused. I tested my power to stop vessels, as in the case of the steamer Dolly.” • Seems to indicate that office of the toll-gatherer was located on the Canal

  5. Dutch lap siding • Single-pile • 6/6 sash • Braced frame • 5 course exterior • Chimney on south elevation • Lath and plaster interior • Side passage plan • Porch on west elevation • Tin roof with shingles underneath First Floor Second Floor

  6. date unknown [1860s – 1890s] 2009 c. 1899 - 1910

  7. date unknown [1860s – 1890s]

  8. Evidence that shed was addition to house

  9. Narrow entrance if used for mule shed – probable office at this time

  10. Telegraph wires for office

  11. Security for lower windows & curtains for office

  12. Lower left window not evident

  13. Addition removed date unknown [1860s – 1890s] c. 1899 - 1910

  14. Detail under roofline removed date unknown [1860s – 1890s] c. 1899 - 1910

  15. 2009 c. 1899 - 1910 Windows apparently boarded, removed later

  16. date unknown [1860s – 1890s] c. 1899 - 1910 2009 Shutter ‘stain’ evident

  17. 2009 c. 1899 - 1910 Confirmation addition was constructed after c. 1910

  18. Lease of land from R.E.B. Stewart to John G. Wallace – 1916-1917

  19. Current Status • House not listed as contributing structure on National Register or on Multiple Property Documentation Form

  20. Current Status • House not listed as contributing structure on National Register or on Multiple Property Documentation Form • House IS listed on DHR Reconnaissance Level Survey and considered contributing by DHR

  21. Current Status • House not listed as contributing structure on National Register or on Multiple Property Documentation Form • House IS listed on DHR Reconnaissance Level Survey and considered contributing by DHR • HOWEVER the NPS does not consider it contributing without “paperwork on it.”

  22. Current Status • House not listed as contributing structure on National Register or on Multiple Property Documentation Form • House IS listed on DHR Reconnaissance Level Survey and considered contributing by DHR • HOWEVER the NPS does not consider it contributing without “paperwork on it.” • Suggestion by DHR to complete “individual nomination tied to MPD”

  23. Current Status • House not listed as contributing structure on National Register or on Multiple Property Documentation Form • House IS listed on DHR Reconnaissance Level Survey and considered contributing by DHR • HOWEVER the NPS does not consider it contributing without “paperwork on it.” • Suggestion by DHR to complete “individual nomination tied to MPD” • DHR Reconnaissance Level Survey indicates could be eligible “under criterion C”

  24. Current Status • House not listed as contributing structure on National Register or on Multiple Property Documentation Form • House IS listed on DHR Reconnaissance Level Survey and considered contributing by DHR • HOWEVER the NPS does not consider it contributing without “paperwork on it.” • Suggestion by DHR to complete “individual nomination tied to MPD” • DHR Reconnaissance Level Survey indicates could be eligible “under criterion C” • Does HPC want to move forward with an individual nomination?

  25. Thank You

More Related