1 / 9

Pupil Premium and ‘what works’

Alan D yson Centre for Equity in Education, University of Manchester d.a.dyson@manchester.ac.uk. Pupil Premium and ‘what works’. The Pupil Premium. “Additional funding” for “disadvantaged pupils” FSM, Ever6, LAC (6+months), service children.

cutter
Download Presentation

Pupil Premium and ‘what works’

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Alan Dyson Centre for Equity in Education, University of Manchester d.a.dyson@manchester.ac.uk Pupil Premium and ‘what works’

  2. The Pupil Premium • “Additional funding” for “disadvantaged pupils” • FSM, Ever6, LAC (6+months), service children. • “Aimed at tackling “underlying inequalities between children eligible for free school meals (FSM) and their peers” • “School leaders should decide” • Accountability through: • Performance tables • Ofsted • Reports for parents • £488 per pupil in 2011-12; £623 in 2012-13; £1300 (primary), £935 (secondary) in 2014-15 • Coincided with attempts to move to a national funding formula

  3. The evaluation National survey of schools Case studies of 34 schools Analysis of budgets of a sample of schools

  4. The findings PP as ‘new money’ Existing provision for disadvantage Monitoring systems Rationales for provision Schools’ concerns Definitions of disadvantage Heads, governors & parents

  5. Key issues • Who counts as ‘disadvantaged’? • Direct attacks on low attainment – or holistic approaches to ‘barriers to learning’? • Stand-alone, ‘evidence-based’ interventions – or contextualised whole-school approaches • Individual school approaches – or collective approaches? • School-led decisions – or central guidance?

  6. Two models • Focused: • Targeted at categories • Focused on attainment • Uses ‘proven’ interventions • Schools act alone • High chance of short-term impact • Doubts about longer-term transformation

  7. Two models • Systemic: • Responds to ‘need’ • Focused on multiple outcomes • Uses context-driven approaches • Schools act with partners • Lower chance of short-term impact • Higher chance of longer-term transformation

  8. The best bet… • Systemic approach • But including a focus on attainment • Indicators of disadvantage as a guide – but not a straitjacket • Detailed monitoring of individual pupils – and of the effects of interventions • Properly thought-through collaborative efforts to tackle the causes • & consequences of poverty

  9. http://www.education.manchester.ac.uk/ research/centres/cee/

More Related