Psych 480 fundamentals of perception and sensation
Download
1 / 22

Psych 480: Fundamentals of Perception and Sensation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 103 Views
  • Uploaded on

Psych 480: Fundamentals of Perception and Sensation. Dr. Keith S. Jones. Why do we perceive?. Realism. Idealism. vs. The Ecological approach. Information Processing approaches. Gibson. Elaboration?. Yes. No. Constructivist approaches. Computational approaches. Helmholtz.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Psych 480: Fundamentals of Perception and Sensation' - cutter


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript


Realism

Idealism

vs.

The Ecological

approach

Information

Processing

approaches

Gibson

Elaboration?

Yes

No

Constructivist

approaches

Computational

approaches

Helmholtz

Rock

Marr


A general ip model
A general IP model

Distal

Stimulus

(a lot can go wrong here)

Proximal

Stimulus

(if elaborative)

Transduction

“Processing”

Percept

Cognition

(if elaborative)


Psychophysics
Psychophysics

Distal

Stimulus

How do these relate to one another?

Proximal

Stimulus

(if elaborative)

Transduction

“Processing”

Percept

Cognition

(if elaborative)


Activity 2 pts
Activity (2 pts)

  • How would you measure the magnitude of a perception?

    • Describe your measurement technique.

    • Explain how it accomplishes your goal.

    • What problems, if any, exist with your technique?


Early attempts

Gustav Fechner (1860)

Concepts

Absolute threshold

Difference threshold

aka “JND”

“Weber’s Law”

I/I=K

Methods

Method of constant stimuli

Method of limits

Method of adjustment

Early attempts

http://www.uni-leipzig.de/fechnerday/


Fechner s attempt

His measurement system

Use a person’s absolute and difference thresholds as a counting system.

Assumes that

All JNDs are subjectively equal

Weber’s law is true

Fechner’s law

Perceived magnitude = K log Intensity

Fechner’s attempt


Example
Example

  • Fechner’s law

    • Perceived magnitude = K log Intensity

  • Assume

    • absolute threshold = 50 units

    • difference threshold = 10%.


Problems
Problems

  • Weber’s law is NOT always true

    • It breaks down at the extremes

  • Stevens (1957) argued that JNDs are not subjectively equal.

    • He argued that they might be for metathetic dimensions (e.g., pitch, color), but not prothetic dimensions (e.g., loudness, brightness)


The tower of Babel was never finished because the workers could not reach an understanding on how they should build it; my psychophysical edifice will stand because the workers will never agree on how to tear it down. (Fechner, 1877)


Stevens attempt

Methods could not reach an understanding on how they should build it; my psychophysical edifice will stand because the workers will never agree on how to tear it down. (Fechner, 1877)

Magnitude estimation

Magnitude production

Cross-modality matching

Steven’s Power Law

Perceived magnitude = K Intensity power

Stevens’ attempt

Exponent = .5

brightness

Exponent = 1

line length

Exponent = 3.5

electric shock


Problems1
Problems could not reach an understanding on how they should build it; my psychophysical edifice will stand because the workers will never agree on how to tear it down. (Fechner, 1877)

  • If you use a category rating scale (i.e., a likert scale), then data follow a logarithmic function, not a power function.

    • Stevens argues that these scales are inherently biased b/c the categories are not subjectively equal.

  • There is also evidence to suggest that magnitude procedures are affected by context as well.

  • Exponent inconsistency over time.


The debate rages on
The debate rages on ... could not reach an understanding on how they should build it; my psychophysical edifice will stand because the workers will never agree on how to tear it down. (Fechner, 1877)

  • Many applied settings have adopted Stevens’ Power Law as a standard.

  • However, from a theoretical standpoint, work is on-going.

    • Krueger, L.E. (1989). Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Toward a unified psychophysical law. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 251-320.


New psychophysics
“New” psychophysics could not reach an understanding on how they should build it; my psychophysical edifice will stand because the workers will never agree on how to tear it down. (Fechner, 1877)

Signal Detection Theory

ß

If likelihood ratio (Psn/Pn) > ß,

then person says “Yes”,

else he or she says “No”

http://acad.cgu.edu/wise/sdt/sdt.html


Signal detection theory
Signal Detection Theory could not reach an understanding on how they should build it; my psychophysical edifice will stand because the workers will never agree on how to tear it down. (Fechner, 1877)


Signal detection theory1
Signal Detection Theory could not reach an understanding on how they should build it; my psychophysical edifice will stand because the workers will never agree on how to tear it down. (Fechner, 1877)

Correct

Rejection

False

Alarm

Hit

Miss


Calculating d and
Calculating d’ and ß could not reach an understanding on how they should build it; my psychophysical edifice will stand because the workers will never agree on how to tear it down. (Fechner, 1877)

  • Based on the p(hit) and p(false alarm), you can calculate d’.

    d’ = zp(fa) - zp(hit)

  • Based on the height of the curves, you can calculate ß.

    ß = height(hit)/ height(fa)


How it works
How it works ... could not reach an understanding on how they should build it; my psychophysical edifice will stand because the workers will never agree on how to tear it down. (Fechner, 1877)

d’ = zp(fa) - zp(hit)

ß

Zhit = -.5

Zfa = 2.5


How it works1
How it works ... could not reach an understanding on how they should build it; my psychophysical edifice will stand because the workers will never agree on how to tear it down. (Fechner, 1877)

ß = height(hit)/ height(fa)

ß

Height = .34

Height = .05


Rules of thumb

For d’, if it is could not reach an understanding on how they should build it; my psychophysical edifice will stand because the workers will never agree on how to tear it down. (Fechner, 1877)

d’ < 1.5 = difficult

d’ = 1.6 to 2.5 = moderately difficult

d’ = 2.6 to 3.5 = moderately easy

d’ > 3.5 = easy

For ß,

three or less is common

If greater than three, person is conservative

Rules of Thumb


Tests of tsd
Tests of TSD could not reach an understanding on how they should build it; my psychophysical edifice will stand because the workers will never agree on how to tear it down. (Fechner, 1877)

  • Vary signal probability

    • Should change ß w/o changing d’

  • Pay-off matrices

    • Systematically affect ß by changing operators strategies w/o changing d’

  • Vary quality of signal

    • Should affect d’ w/o affecting ß

  • 2nd chance experiment

    • If person is incorrect, then must be below threshold so giving a 2nd choice shouldn’t matter. If TSD is correct, then 2nd choice should beat chance b/c people differentially weight different possibilities.


ad