1 / 13

A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass. Motivation Methods Results. Xiangxiang Xue Hans-Walter Rix , G. Zhao, P. Re Fiorentin, T. Naab, M. Steinmetz, E. F. Bell, F. C. van den Bosch, T. C. Beers, R. Wilhelm, Y. S. Lee, C. Rockosi, B. Yanny,

curt
Download Presentation

A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass Motivation Methods Results Xiangxiang Xue Hans-Walter Rix , G. Zhao, P. Re Fiorentin, T. Naab, M. Steinmetz, E. F. Bell, F. C. van den Bosch, T. C. Beers, R. Wilhelm, Y. S. Lee, C. Rockosi, B. Yanny, H. Newberg, X. Kang, M. C. Smith, D. P. Schneider Dec 3 2008 KIAA-Cambridge Joint Workshop

  2. Why to estimate the MW halo mass? Milky Way properties scale with halo mass Mstar /Mhalo  cooled baryon fraction Number of expected sub-halos The poorly known Galactic parameter Recent lit. values 0.8–2.5 x 1012 Mͽ Are all satellites bound?

  3. Blitz 1990’s (HI) Dehnen&Binney 1998 15kpc ~200 discrete tracers Battaglia, Helmi et al 2006 How to estimate the MW halo mass? • Basic approach: • Assemble a large and well defined set of distant kinematic tracers from SDSS DR6 • blue Horizontal Branch Stars with • 5% distances to D~60 kpc • dv ~ 10 km/s + Fe/H estimates • Compare to kinematics in simulated halos that have been scaled to different halo mass • derive p(vlos) at different rgc • model it to get vcir(r)

  4. Selection of the “clean” BHB sample • Pre-selected by color (Yanny et al 2000) • Measure Balmer line profile parameters • (cfSirko et al 2004, Xue, Rix et al 2008) solid line---BHB Star dotted line---Blue Straggler star SEGUE Survey Spectra Line Shape Parameters • identification >90% • Distances 5-10% • Stars are metal poor 2400 halo BHB stars

  5. Spatial, velocity and [Fe/H] distributions of BHBs velocity distribution spatial distribution metallicity distribution velocity dispersion

  6. How to estimate the MW halo mass? • Modelling the BHB kinematics with simulations make “mock observations” from within the output of the cosmological (Milky Way-like) galaxy simulations, and then match P(Vlos /Vcir|r) to give Vcir,obs(r), and ultimately Mvir • use simulations from two different groups (Steinmetz, Naab) • same volume as SDSS DR6 • derive P(Vlos/Vcir, r) for simulated halo stars • get P(Vlos/Vcir, r) for observed halo BHB stars • matching the distributions gives estimate of Vcir,obs(r) • [also use good ole’ Jean Eq.]

  7. Red dots are halo BHB stars , while Black dots are simulated halo stars Vesc(r) Vesc(r) Vcir(r) Vcir(r) P(Vlos/Vcir) Mhalo ~ 1012 Mͽ Mhalo ~ 2 × 1012 Mͽ

  8. Comparison of P(Vl.o.s/Vcir) in radial bin [15.0,20.0] kpc Psim(Vlos, / Vcir),  Construct estimate of Vcir(r) Pobs(Vl.o.s,/Vcir) if vcir(obs)=180km/s P(Vlos/Vcir, obs) = P(Vlos/Vcir, sim)

  9. Vcir(r) derived by Jeans Equation • First, relate σlos,obs(r) to σr(r) • Then, use Jeans Equation for • Use observed (photometric) halo profile ρ*~r-3.5 • Estimate Vcir(r) radially anisotropic case, β=0.37 (simulations) radially isotropic case, β=0.0

  10. Estimate the DM halo mass • NFW DM halo + Hernquist bulge + exponential disk • Rotation curve matches • Both ‘contracted’ and ‘uncontracted’ halos match • Mvir=1.0± 0.3 × 1012 Mͽ

  11. Result • Robust measurement (2sims+Jeans Eq.) M (r<60 kpc) = 4.0±0.7×1011 Mͽ • Vcirc(R) is not constant but gently falling, and matches either contracted or uncontracted NFW profile • If DM halo is NFW then Mvir (~275kpc) = 1.0± 0.3× 1012 Mͽ consistent with previous estimates, but more precise • Imply (high) 40% of baryons end up as stars • LMC and other satellites marginally bound V3D,LMC=378 km/s +- 18km/s (Besla et al 2007)

  12. Thank You

More Related