1 / 22

GIS ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE WARMING IMPACT ON WINE GROWING REGIONS DISTRIBUTION IN SLOVENIA

Workshop on climatic analysis and mapping for agriculture 14-17 June 2005, Bologna, Italy. GIS ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE WARMING IMPACT ON WINE GROWING REGIONS DISTRIBUTION IN SLOVENIA. Andreja Sušnik* Lučka Kajfež-Bogataj** Blaž Kurnik*

cullen
Download Presentation

GIS ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE WARMING IMPACT ON WINE GROWING REGIONS DISTRIBUTION IN SLOVENIA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Workshop on climatic analysis and mapping for agriculture 14-17 June 2005, Bologna, Italy GIS ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE WARMING IMPACT ON WINE GROWING REGIONS DISTRIBUTION IN SLOVENIA Andreja Sušnik* Lučka Kajfež-Bogataj** Blaž Kurnik* * Environmental Agency of the Republic of Slovenia** Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana

  2. Talk Outline • Climate Change Issues • Winegrowing in Slovenia • Winkler index • GIS Technique • Results • Conclusions

  3. Starting points • The baseline climate in a region largely determines the varieties that canripen and the general style (flavor and structure) of wine an area canproduce. • Grapevines are generally grown in narrow climatic zonesfor aspecific variety’s optimum quality, putting them at a greaterpotential risk from climatic variations and change. • Good wine cannot be made from bad grapes.

  4. Climate Change Potential Effects on Viticulture • 􀂃 Warmer and longer growingseasons • 􀂃 Altered phenological timing • 􀂃 Altered ripening profiles • 􀂃 Climatic thresholds • 􀂃 Altered disease and pest timingand severity • 􀂃 Altered water needs • 􀂃 CO2 issues (growth and quality) • 􀂃 Need for management adaptations

  5. ITALY: Maracchi, 2003

  6. German study

  7. Germany, Austria (Stock, 2003)

  8. Winegrowing regions in Slovenia and existing vineyards locations(red)17000 ha (54000 vines) Podravje region Posavje region Primorje region

  9. Method • Comparison of baseline period 1961-1990 to 1975- 2004 • modified Winkler climatic index as climate indice • GIS technique (54 stations) • Simple analysis do not account formoisture issues,respiration effects, winter cold, extreme weather etc.

  10. Geographical Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) software • GRASS is a free software under terms of general public license, developed in the Centre for Applied Geographical and Spatial Research at Baylor University. • There is also an internal computer language that allows user to create new applications and link GRASS to other software packages (eg. GSTAT). • In this study we developed methodology to plot contours of temperature sums over small regions. Thus, interpolation using the simple kriging techniques has been performed for each point of the 100 x 100 m grid over Slovenia land below 1000 m a.s.l. Estimates have been made for each point of the grid using 55 locations. • For spatial estimation of the change the integrated geostatistical GRASS functions were used.

  11. Locations of meteorological stations used in the GIS analysis(54 red dots) region Posavje region Data of land use were derived by CORINE land cover and by Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food vineyards locations were obtained.

  12. The classification of the viticultural climatic regions according Winkler climatic index (Riou, 1994) • Area I < 1390 °CGeneve, Vienna, Geisenheim, Dijon, Bordeaux • Area II 1391 to 1670 °CBudapest, Napa (USA), Santiago (Chile) • Area III 1671 to 1950 °CMontepellier (France), Milan • Area IV 1951 to 2220 °CVenice, Mendoza (Argentina), The cape (South Africa) • Area V > 2220° CSplit (Croatia), Palermo (Italy), Algiers (Algeria)

  13. Winegrowing regions according to modified Winkler climatic index (IWm) as used in Slovenia • Area I < 1390 °C • Area II 1391 to 1670 °C 

  14. Variety classification based on the average growing season temperature 6 world winegrowing regions are marked Comparison with 3 Slovenian winegrowing regions

  15. An increase in average growing season temperature 16.2 1961-1990 16.0 15.8 1975-2004 15.6 . Average growing season temperature (°C) 15.4 15.2 15.0 14.8 14.6 14.4 Posavje Podravje Primorje

  16. Slovenian land area during 1961-1990 and 1975-2004 regarding to IWm

  17. Slovenian viticultural area during 1961-1990 and 1975-2004 regarding to IWm

  18. Distribution of IWm in Slovenia during 1961 – 1990 and existing viticulture areas existing vineyards locations in Slovenia (black)

  19. Comparison of IWmareas in Slovenia1961-19901975-2004 existing vineyards locations in Slovenia (black spots)

  20. The analysis of elevation of existing wine growing regions • average elevation shift for 132 m from 1961-1990 to 1975-2004 • In recent period the potential viticultural regions possible up to 700 m a.s.l.

  21. Conclusions • Geostatistics can be applied to describe the spatial variability of meteorological parameters over small regions. • Later varieties could gain on their structure with climate change because their ripening would be shifted to a more optimal time, i.e. the mid September in Primorska and the beginning of October in Podravje and Posavje. • The ripening of earlier varieties (Pinot Gris, Pinot Noir, Chardonnay, Pinot Blanc) may shift to the period with relatively high temperatures also over night which makes them less favourable. In Primorje region certain adjustments are required. • Cooler regions should benefit more than warm regions with the ability to shift to a wider range of varieties. • Some regions, near their optimum, may no longer be able to produce the same wines without changes in technologies.

More Related