1 / 59

Raymond Eytle Brigitte Collins

Improving Human Resource Management Capability in a Higher Education Institution through Implementation of a Computerised HRMS.- Lessons from the UWI Presentation to ACHEA Conference. Raymond Eytle Brigitte Collins. Background.

csykes
Download Presentation

Raymond Eytle Brigitte Collins

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Improving Human Resource Management Capability in a Higher Education Institution through Implementation of a Computerised HRMS.- Lessons from the UWI Presentation to ACHEA Conference Raymond Eytle Brigitte Collins

  2. Background • Efficient and effective Human Resource Management in Higher Education is critical to ensuring sustained Quality and Competitiveness of any institution. • Effective Implementation of an appropriate Computerised Human Resource Management System is critical to enhancing the organisation’s Human Resource management capability and service delivery

  3. Background • Effective implementation of such a major “Enterprise Administrative System” is a very complex undertaking, and the Higher Education environment has some added complexities. • The tradition has been for the focus to be on technical implementation issues.

  4. Background • The functional user, usually administrative or Management personnel, now plays a key role in implementing contemporary systems. • There are many lessons to be learnt from the perspective of functional Human Resources Personnel in the implementation process

  5. The Human Resource Management System at UWI • The Acquisition and Implementation of a Computerised HRMS was not like buying Microsoft Office at the Computer Store and installing it.- • It started with a vision.

  6. Vision of Human Resource Function -1 • HR focus shift from Administrative to Strategic, Facilitative, Consultative and Developmental • Improved HR Operational efficiency and effectiveness in HR, in support of University Mission and Objectives.

  7. Vision of Human Resource Function - 2 • HR as a central source of timely and accurate data to support processes, such as • Workforce Planning and Analysis, • Position Management, • Recruitment, • Staff Training and Development, • Compensation Management, • Skills/Competencies • Career Management, • Industrial Relations,

  8. Vision of Human Resource Function - 3 • HR Processes which • put information at the line management level • make data accessible to individual customers for the specified purpose of inquiry or change • are automated • allow for re-engineering areas of functionality

  9. Our HR Direction. -1 • A highly efficient HR Service to the University/ Campus by • developing a and implementing improved and efficient processes and procedures based on functions and customer needs and not on hierarchy • facilitating informed and timely decision-making

  10. Our HR Direction.-2 • Auditing processes and practices for continuous improvement • Developing plans and programs HR development using sound data analysis techniques

  11. Our HR Direction.-3 • Regarding process improvement as ongoing, taking account of changing needs and new technology, as it emerges • Using appropriate technology - electronic mail, intranet, internet, document management - in order to improve communication and data access across campus.

  12. Our Focus - Process Improvement • Structured approach • Positive impact on quality of services • Meet or exceed customer’s expectations • Add value -- Staff, Students,Campus/ University, Public

  13. Our Challenges - External • Financial constraints • Rapidly changing technology • Increasing competition • Customers (Students and Regional Governments ) being more demanding and requiring higher levels of accountability and performance.

  14. Challenges- Internal • Customer dissatisfaction with unavailable, incorrect and inconsistent information • Redundancy of activities-lengthy processes • Structure and decision-making on organizational hierarchy rather than on process and function • Decision-making authority either too centralized or • too bureaucratic

  15. Challenges- Internal • “Common & consistent practices” are not part of the culture • Highly autonomous organizational units • Old systems should accommodate all differences • No incentives for consolidation of systems & practices STANDARDS

  16. Challenges- Internal • Strong Culture of Tradition and Custom and practice. • Hierarchy of Approvals • Redundancy of information • Organizational units reluctant to change

  17. Challenges Identified-UWI -1 • No Executive Commitment to Radical Change • Inadequacy of Resources • The process to change Ordinances, Regulations and Collective Agreements • Laws, Custom and Practice.

  18. Challenges -UWI -2 • Multiple locations and cultures • Multiple health plans • Multiple vacation plans • Multiple unions • Wide variety of job groups & pay practices

  19. High comfort level Success History Value Concern Scorn Inertia Lack of objectivity Genuine concern Political reasons Challenges -UWI-3 Resistance to Change

  20. How Did We Get There? • Piece-meal and Hierarchical /Departmental approach to development of processes and procedures. This resulted in: • Separate Personnel Administration Systems evolving based on national and Campus situations • Various sub-systems were developed to support specific functions, based on group/ organizational differentiation within the Organization

  21. How Did We Get There • Original assumptions that are no longer valid

  22. Options Considered • Radical Re-engineering of work processes based on functionality and current available technology • phased process change

  23. Opportunities for Change • University Governance and Strategic Plans and Operating plans have all identified current process weaknesses and the need for change. • availability of successful HRMS technology which is process-oriented

  24. Re-Engineering - Definition “...the fundamental rethinking and radical redesign of business processes to achieve dramatic improvements in critical, contemporary measures of performance, such as cost, quality, service, and speed.” Hammer & Champy

  25. PeopleSoft at UWI

  26. Peoplesoft HRMS at UWI • Before system was purchased a review and analysis was done to determine the Human Resource information and process requirements. • Peoplesoft HRMS was acquired by UWI in 1995 and implementation has been on-going in phases since.

  27. Peoplesoft HRMS at UWI • A RFP was prepared and responses from vendors were judged by a multi-disciplinary team on the following • The general fit of the system -un-customised to fill the defined needs • Security of Data • User-friendliness-query and report writing • Cost and Maintenance • Customer Support and Training

  28. Peoplesoft HRMS at UWI • Highlights of the System • Comprehensive functionality • Process-oriented • User driven • Client-Server moving towards n-tier architecture • Security at several levels • GUI - Windows at client end • Easy interface with Microsoft Office • User-friendly Query and Reporting Capability - Crystal

  29. Peoplesoft HRMS at UWI • Implementation Team both Technical and Functional. • Users play a major role in implementation process • Increasing capabilities of new Versions - Resource issues

  30. Peoplesoft Functionality Career Planning Payroll HR Audit Base Benefits Administration SuccessionPlanning Position/Fund Acctg Health andSafety SalaryAdministration Competency Management Reporting Recruitment Industrial Relations TrainingAdministration Query Administer Personnel PositionManagement

  31. Process Objectives • Release of personnel from routine-non value added tasks to Developmental areas such as planning, training and staff development, on-going process review • Better monitoring of performance through review of reports • Framework in place for the future

  32. Process Objectives • Decision-making-: • De-centralised : At the Department level • Limit required approvals • Electronic signatures and Authority • Quicker decision-making • Timely, consistent, accurate and “just-enough” information. • Improved efficiency:- • elimination of manual processes • removal of redundant processes and process steps,

  33. Process Difficulties • Multiple forms with redundant data • Dual data entry, inconsistent information • Poor communications • Much activity and no value-added • Expensive • Error Prone

  34. Peoplesoft HRMS at UWI • Before system was purchased a comprehensive review and analysis was done to determine the Human Resource information and process needs.

  35. Peoplesoft HRMS at UWI • A RFP was prepared and responses from vendors were judged by a multi-disciplinary team on the following • The general fit of the system -un-customised to fill the defined needs • User-friendliness-query and report writing • Security of Data • Cost and Maintenance • Customer Support and Training

  36. Peoplesoft HRMS at UWI • Main Highlights of the System • Comprehensive covering most strategic and operational requirements current and future • User Friendly • GUI - Windows at client end • Easy interface with Microsoft office • Simple Query and Reporting Capability – Crystal • Security

  37. Peoplesoft HRMS at UWI • Implementation Team both Technical and Functional. • Users play a major role in implementation process • Increasing capabilities of new Versions - Resource issues

  38. Process Review and Implementation Strategies -1 • Increase emphasis on process -- clearly identify Centre/Campus - reengineer, standardize where possible. Design processes that can perform well across organizational boundaries. • Replace obsolete systems . • Re-engineer systems that will not be replaced.

  39. Process Review and Implementation Strategies -2 • Single point of entry for employee data. • Ad hoc query, report and analysis capabilities. • Employee data immediately available to supervisors. • Promote uniformity. • Reduce paperwork. • Process improvement as ongoing, taking account of changing needs and advantages of new technology, as it emerges.

  40. Process Review and Implementation Strategies -3 • Minimum Customisation • Common standards within each campus and across campuses for data, reports, policies and processes. • User focus • Team approach (Functional/Technical) • Provide information for Data based decision making at all levels.

  41. Process Review and Implementation Strategies -4 • Responsibility for an action should reside closest to the place most affected. • emphasis on effective post-action audits • build controls into the System where possible. • Integrate the use of E-mail into processes, both for messages and to convey documents.

  42. Process Review and Implementation Strategies -6 • Focus on common standards within each campus and across campuses for data, reports, policies and processes. • Shorten the cycle time for processing transactions by at least 60%. Achieve this by reducing: the number of steps, manual effort, the number of handoffs, the number of authorizations and by eliminating wasteful and non-value-adding activities.

  43. Issues - reasons for implementation delays • Lack of senior management commitment • Lack of adequate implementation budget • Lack of dedicated full-time project team • project management • technical team • functional user involvement • Lack of adequate technical infrastructure

  44. Success Factors • Executive Sponsor • University Registrar’s relentless efforts, direct involvement • Implementation Budget • Dedicated project management • Presented realistic implementation budget

  45. Success Factors • Establishment of University team (across the campuses) • Functional Analysts • Systems Analysts • Project Coordinators • Database Administrators • Adequate technical environment • Proper database servers on each campus • Replace/acquire client machines • Address network infrastructure issues

  46. Implementation Overview • Mona implementation • focus for initial implementation • addressed technical, human resources issues • standardize processes across HR departments - business process review • public relations drive • newsletters • presentations (deans, department heads, unions)

  47. Implementation Overview • Cave Hill • lack of HR functional user involvement/ ownership • leveraged from lessons learnt at Mona • results of BPR exercise • user procedures • St Augustine • total lack of interest until payroll and Y2K became an issue

  48. Lessons - Opportunities • Project management and Planning • Training and Development • Business Process Review and Re-engineering

  49. Functional Considerations • Involved functional users at ALL stages - one reason for success • Obtained functional user buy-in early • Ensured that dedicated functional users were part of core team • identify and obtain best talent • full-time dedicated users to the project is very important but almost never attainable.

  50. Functional Considerations • Payroll • Decision to use PeopleSoft - workshop at Cave Hill involving Payroll & Benefits representatives from all campuses in June 1998 • prior to PS, each campus operated independently • Pro - Integrated HR/Payroll system • Con - Required customization - Taxes, payment methods • On-site Functional Training • Introduction to HR • Introduction to Benefits • Payroll I and II

More Related