1 / 39

Developing Edition 3.0 of CIPSANON David W. Hann February 24, 2016

Developing Edition 3.0 of CIPSANON David W. Hann February 24, 2016. Differences Between Editions. Edition 1.0 – Used ORGANON software and annual equations from both SWO and SMC Type I

cstorey
Download Presentation

Developing Edition 3.0 of CIPSANON David W. Hann February 24, 2016

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developing Edition 3.0 of CIPSANON David W. Hann February 24, 2016

  2. Differences Between Editions • Edition 1.0 – Used ORGANON software and annual equations from both SWO and SMC Type I • Edition 2.0 – Used software that had been modified/improved specifically for CIPS and annual equations from both SWO and SMC Type I • Edition 3.0 – Uses Edition 2.0 software and SWO equations, but the SMC equations have been replaced by the PNW annual equations developed by Doug Mainwaring

  3. All Editions of CIPSANON are composed of two DLLs: CIPSEDIT and CIPSRUN Each DLL contains equations and parameters for two versions of CIPSANON: SWO and either SMC or PNW.

  4. The SWO version incorporates equations and parameters for 18 species with the option of using either site index or WHC20 and PPTDD41. The SMC or PNW version incorporates equations and parameters for 11 species using just site index.

  5. CIPSEDIT.DLL utilizes 7 static and 3 dynamic species-specific equations.

  6. Static equations in CIPSEDIT.DLL include predictors of: • Maximum crown width of open grown trees - NWO • DIB from DBH – SWO • DBH from DIB - SWO • Height-diameter for all living trees - SMC • Height-to-crown-base for all living trees • Dominant height • Diameter at 11.8” above ground

  7. Dynamic equations in CIPSEDIT.DLL include predictors of: • Diameter increment of trees on untreated plots • Probability of mortality of trees on untreated plots • Change in weed cover

  8. CIPSRUN.DLL utilizes 10 static and 17 dynamic species-specific equations.

  9. Static equations in CIPSRUN.DLL include predictors of: • Maximum crown width of open grown trees - NWO • Largest crown width of stand growth trees - NWO • Height to the largest crown width - NWO • Crown width at any point in the crown - NWO • Height-diameter for undamaged trees - SMC • Height-to-crown-base for undamaged trees • Maximum height-to-crown-base from CCFL - SMC • Maximum height/DBH ratio from DBH - SMC • Maximum size-density trajectory - SMC • Bruce (1981) Dominant height • Diameter at 11.8” above the ground • DBH assignment when height exceeds 4.5-feet

  10. Dynamic equations in CIPSRUN.DLL include predictors of: • Height Increment • Diameter Increment • Mortality Rate • Change in Weed Cover

  11. Height Increment Equations • Bruce (1981) dominant height increment • Height increment of trees on untreated plots • Average of the largest 1/3 of the height increment residuals • Average of the smallest 1/3 of the height increment residuals • Thinning impact upon height increment - SMC • Fertilization impact upon height increment - SMC • Genetic improvement impact upon height increment • Swiss needle cast infection impact upon height increment • Weed cover impact upon height increment • Can be applied to trees below breast height

  12. Diameter Increment Equations • Diameter increment of trees on untreated plots • Average of the largest 1/3 of the diameter increment residuals • Average of the smallest 1/3 of the diameter increment residuals • Thinning impact upon diameter increment - SMC • Fertilization impact upon diameter increment - SMC • Genetic improvement impact upon diameter increment • Swiss needle cast infection impact upon diameter increment • Weed cover impact upon diameter increment

  13. Mortality Rate Equations • Probability of mortality on untreated plots • Fertilization impact upon probability of mortality • Can be applied to trees below breast height

  14. Comparison of Predictions The following are a comparison of predictions from: • SMC-ORGANON Edition 9.1 • SMC-CIPSANON Edition 2.0 • PNW-CIPSANON Edition 3.0

  15. Tree lists from three SMC Type I installations were used to make the projections Comparison of Predictions

  16. Comparison of Predictions Each plot was projected up to 80 years from seed and the following plot-level attributes were graphed for each plot: • Total stem cubic foot volume per acre (TSCFV) • Basal area per acre (BA) • Number of trees per acre (TPA) • Top height (H40) • Stand density index (SDI)

  17. Comparison of Predictions

  18. Comparison of Predictions

  19. Comparison of Predictions

  20. Comparison of Predictions

  21. Comparison of Predictions

  22. Comparison of Predictions

  23. Comparison of Predictions

  24. Comparison of Predictions

  25. Comparison of Predictions

  26. Comparison of Predictions

  27. Comparison of Predictions

  28. Comparison of Predictions

  29. Comparison of Predictions

  30. Comparison of Predictions

  31. Comparison of Predictions

  32. Impact of Spacing Upon Predictions Data from initial measurements of the six spacings from SMC Type III Installation 914 Bruce’s (1981) site index of 138.8 This is located at the Lewisburg Saddle of the College of Forestry’s McDonald-Dunn Research Forest

  33. Impact of Spacing Upon Predictions

  34. Impact of Spacing Upon Predictions

  35. Impact of Spacing Upon Predictions

  36. Impact of Spacing Upon Predictions

  37. Impact of Spacing Upon Predictions

  38. Impact of Spacing Upon Predictions

  39. Impact of Spacing Upon Predictions

More Related