1 / 21

Project UPLIFT

Project UPLIFT. Nancy J. Thompson, Ph.D., M.P.H. Rollins School of Public Health Emory University. Project UPLIFT. U sing P ractice and L earning to I ncrease F avorable T houghts Delivery of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy by telephone and Internet To people with epilepsy

cree
Download Presentation

Project UPLIFT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Project UPLIFT Nancy J. Thompson, Ph.D., M.P.H. Rollins School of Public Health Emory University

  2. Project UPLIFT • Using Practice and Learning to Increase Favorable Thoughts • Delivery of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy by telephone and Internet • To people with epilepsy • Most of the work presented here was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

  3. About Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) • Cognitive Therapy addresses the unrealistic thinkingassociated with depression. • Uses verbal techniques to explore the reasoning behind specific attitudes and assumptions. • Client is taught to recognize, monitor, and record negative thoughts on a daily record. • CBT focuses on changing thought content while mindfulness changes relationship to the thoughts—see them as passing events that do not necessarily represent a state of reality. • Mindfulness is important in preventing relapse.

  4. Cognitive Therapy vs. Medications in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Depression Across the 3 treatments ([chi]22 = 10.22, P = .006). ADM vs. pill placebo ([chi]21 = 10.17, P = .001), CT vs. pill placebo ([chi]21 = 4.44, P = .04) ADM vs. CT ([chi]21 = 0.71, P = .40). Between sites: Wald [chi]22 = 1.59, P = .45

  5. Follow-up after Mindfulness vs. Treatment as Usual for the Treatment of Depression 4+ Sessions Intent to Treat

  6. Project UPLIFT • Delivery of MBCT by Web and Telephone Groups • People with epilepsy randomly assigned to groups of 7 • Initially computers and Internet access provided if needed • Group delivery important for support surrounding epilepsy • Co-Facilitators • Graduate Public Health Student • Person with epilepsy • Supervised by a licensed psychologist

  7. Potential Benefits • Cost-effective • Can reach the mobility/transportation limited • Equal reach to urban and rural • Allows peer support, even with rare conditions • Potential for anonymity and avoidance of stigma • Can prevent relapse • Does not require more medication • Mindfulness may improve attention/cognition

  8. Project UPLIFT • 8 Sessions (1 hour by phone) • Noting Challenging/Changing Impermanent

  9. Telephone Version Session Four: Attention and Mindfulness

  10. Web Version Session One: Monitoring Thoughts

  11. Formative Evaluation Focus Groups • Importance of Group • “Medical professionals can tell you the what, the why, the diagnosis, but in a group of people with epilepsy, there’s camaraderie and you can see what other people go through.” • “Being in a group with other people with epilepsy is like sharing with your close friends. You realize that everyone has their insecurities and you feel more safe.” • Response to Activities • “If I could learn to modify my thoughts, that would be practical.” • “The good thing about doing mindfulness of sounds and thoughts is that you can do it anywhere.”

  12. Design—Outcome Evaluation Stratum 1:Pretest 6-8 wk phone Interimas usual Follow-up Stratum 2:Pretest 6-8 wk Web Interimas usual Follow-up Stratum 3: Pretestas usual Interim 6-8 wk phone Follow-up Stratum 4: Pretestas usual Interim 6-8 wk Web Follow-up Baseline Week 8 Week 16

  13. Depression: BDI • UPLIFT vs.Waitlist (treatment as usual) • Foverall = 42.22, p=.0001 • Finteraction= 11.99, p=.001*

  14. Depression: BDI By Intervention Type • Phone vs. Web vs. Waitlist (treatment as usual) • Foverall = 41.65, p=.0001 • Finteraction= 5.93, p=.006*

  15. No difference with • Major Depressive Disorder or not (F1,35= 1.21, p = 0.279) • Maintenance

  16. Knowledge/Skills & Self-Efficacy

  17. Quality of Life 1.05<p<.10

  18. Summary • Effective in: • Reducing depressive symptoms and teaching knowledge and skills associated with reducing depression • Intervention group showed significant improvement compared to the waitlist • Equally effective for those with and without MDD • Reduction in depressive symptoms maintained • Approaching significance for Satisfaction with Life and Depression Coping Self-Efficacy • Delivery • Both phone and web were significantly more effective in reducing depression than waitlist condition

  19. Participants’ Comments • “I told my therapist I think I like this way a lot better…I’ve always went and talked to somebody versus learning to work through things just using my own mindset.” • “The project had great value. I'm thankful that I was able to participate. I got a lot out of the exercises and coping skills.” • “The program was very helpful and that surprised me. I printed everything out and recorded the meditations onto my MP3 player.” • “The program helped me more than the antidepressants I've been on for years.” • “Thank you for helping me because I have been depressed and now I can cope.”

  20. Potential Benefits • Cost-effective • Reaches the mobility limited • Equal reach to urban and rural • Can form groups even with rare conditions • Potential for anonymity and avoidance of stigma • Prevent relapse

  21. Project UPLIFT • Next Phase • ~$1 million Challenge Grant • UPLIFT for Prevention • Participants in MEW network states • Georgia • Michigan • Texas • Washington

More Related