The sapir whorf hypothesis
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 9

The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 104 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. To what extent, if at all, does our language govern our thought processes?. Grammar . “In substance, grammar is one and the same in all languages, but it may vary accidentally.” Roger Bacon Chomsky – the propensity to receive grammar is innate.

Download Presentation

The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


The sapir whorf hypothesis

The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

To what extent, if at all, does our language govern our thought processes?


Grammar

Grammar

  • “In substance, grammar is one and the same in all languages, but it may vary accidentally.” Roger Bacon

  • Chomsky – the propensity to receive grammar is innate.

  • Backed up by studies conducted by Kegl in Nicaragua into deaf children who independently developed what became known an Nicaraguan sign.

  • Consider some corresponding KIs after you’ve compared languages around your table


Sapir whorf hypothesis

Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

1) Strong: Language determines thought and that linguistic categories limit and determine cognitive categories. (What we CAN and CAN NOT think)

2) Weak: Linguistic categories and usage influences thought and certain kinds of non-linguistic behaviour. (Influences how we THINK about things)


The strong version

The ‘Strong’ Version

How language influences the way in which we CAN THINK …

  • Research Case 1:

    Peterson and Siegal

    http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/4110/whorf.html

  • Research Case 2:

    Numerical Differentiation – Piraha tribe

    In Brazilian Amizon

    “One, Two, Many”

    First noted by Peter Gordon


The weak version

The ‘Weak’ Version

How language influences the way in which we THINK …

  • Research Case 1:

    Spatial Orientation - Australian aboriginals

    - Guugu Yimithirr

Research Case 2:

Colour Differentiation – Russian

vs.

Research Case 3:

Perception of things (Bridge) –

German/Spanish

- El puente vs. die Brücke


Back to our definition of knowledge language is the dress of thought samuel johnson

Back to our definition of knowledge“Language is the dress of thought” Samuel Johnson

  • Quechua Incas

  • Particles are attached to nouns to signify:

  • Personal knowledge: “I know it for a fact”

  • Hearsay knowledge: “or so I’ve heard.”

  • What difference would this make if knowledge claims were this distinction to be adopted in English?


The piraha revisited an extreme empirical model

The Piraha Revisited – An extreme Empirical Model

  • What follows is the thesis of Dan Everett who had spent far more time with the Piraha than Gordon and was the first to decode their languge

  • Piraha embodies a living-in-the-present ethos so powerful that it has affected every aspect of the people’s lives

  • do not think, or speak, in abstractions

  • do not use color terms, quantifiers, numbers, or myths

  • E.g. xibipío “When someone walks around a bend in the river, the Pirahã say that the person has not simply gone away but xibipío—‘gone out of experience,’

  • Dan Everett, the Pirahã’sunswerving dedication to empirical reality

    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/04/16/070416fa_fact_colapinto#ixzz27g0BOyJV


Experiment you need to think in the language for this to work assuming it will work at all

Experiment – you need to think in the language for this to work (assuming it will work at all!)

  • Pictorial language:

  • Non Pictorial Language:

  • Ghost

  • Presumptuous


The sapir whorf hypothesis

Here’s what you might have come up with if the pictorial element of the language governs:

“娱”[amusement], “耍”[playful], “婪”[greedy], “嫉”[envy], “妒”[envy], “嫌”[dislike], “佞”[to flatter], “妄”[presumptuous], “妖”[evil], “奴”[slave], “妓”[prostitute], “娼”[prostitute], “奸”[rape], “姘”[have an affair], “婊”[prostitute] and “嫖”[prostitute]


  • Login