1 / 14

Session 3: Comparative Political Systems

Session 3: Comparative Political Systems. BUS 430 Summer 2013 Dr. Rajiv Krishnan Kozhikode. Agenda. Critical reflection report 1 Critical reflection report 2 Comparative Political Systems. Towards a classification of political systems.

creda
Download Presentation

Session 3: Comparative Political Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Session 3: Comparative Political Systems BUS 430 Summer 2013 Dr. Rajiv Krishnan Kozhikode

  2. Agenda • Critical reflection report 1 • Critical reflection report 2 • Comparative Political Systems

  3. Towards a classification of political systems • Each government is different – i.e., idiosyncrasies exist • But there are greater similarities between some governments • These similarities can guide classification of political systems • But for classification to be meaningful, • It should NOT look at peripheral characteristics, such as regions • It should look at actions and observable behavior

  4. How to understand actions? • A political system can be understood by answering the following • What actions are performed by the system of roles? • Why is it done? • How does it affect the actions and behaviors of others? • Roles are the micro-unit of analysis in a political system system • Roles are an actor’s orientation which constitutes and defines his/her participation in an interactive process… • These roles include: government agencies, political parties, pressure groups, media, public at large. • Roles are enacted based on a set of complementary expectations – i.e., actor’s own actions and those others that an actor interacts with. • Such expectations are backed by coercion • A political system comprises of a pattern of interacting roles affecting decisions backed by the threat of coercion

  5. Political systems and political culture • Orientation to political action determine the what and why questions • Embedded in patterns that determine the how question • Hence, political culture refers to a political system that is embedded in a particular pattern of orientations to political action

  6. Almond’s typology of political systems • Anglo-American • Pre-industrial/partially industrialized • Totalitarian • Continental European

  7. The Anglo-American political system • Highly differentiated roles • Manifest, organized and bureaucratized • High degree of stability in functions • Diffusion of power and influence within the whole political system • But there could be multiple cultures within a same system • Or, multiple systems for a same political culture. • Existence of a rational political market for votes and in exchange for policies. • Broadly shared ideas of a secular political culture • Freedom, mass welfare and security • With differing emphasis on either.

  8. Pre-industrial/partially industrialized • Mixed political cultures • Mixed political systems • Modernization leads to Anglo-American system • But loss of traditional values creates uncertainty • Leads to political instability • Some charismatic leaders might emerge • So a combination of modern and old world

  9. Totalitarian • Manufactured homogeneity • Cannot be fully coercive • Some amount of benevolence needed • Tries to create illusion of political inclusion through one party elections

  10. Continental European • Again a mix • Religion based • Class based • Economic development based • Or a mix of any of these emphasis • The political market is not for exchange of political goods and services but for particularistic ends such as transformation of political system into something other than a bargaining agency.

  11. Role of religion in politics • Should the state and religion separate? • Can it be separate? • What are the evidences? • Secularization has be prophesied but not taken off • Fundamentalism has emerged in many places • How should we look at it then? • Market for religion • Different religions co-exist because not all religions cater to the needs of the entire society

  12. What is secularization? • No role for religion in state/politics • Modernization will lead to scientific thinking and avoid traditional superstitions • Multiple religions preach different ideas about reality, so disagreements will lead people to neglect religion altogether.

  13. What explains the rise of fundamentalism • Ironically, it is modernization • People face uncertainty in the absence of religion • There is resistance to scientific approaches • There is also identification perhaps in the presence of multiple religions • There is need to consider the existence of a market for religions, just like there is a market for ideologies • How organized are the religious institutions to warrant political clout?

  14. That’s it for today • Next session we will look at: Different IR systems

More Related