1 / 10

S/WAVES Impulsive Signals: Possible Interplanetary Dust An update

S/WAVES Impulsive Signals: Possible Interplanetary Dust An update. M. L. Kaiser, K. Goetz, C. St. Cyr, R. Howard. DMSP/GPS Behind. New software uploaded Did NOT cause impulses to stop. Periodic, too!. Adapted from Wang et al., Plan & Spa. Sci., 54 , 957-966, 2006.

cpaulson
Download Presentation

S/WAVES Impulsive Signals: Possible Interplanetary Dust An update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. S/WAVES Impulsive Signals:Possible Interplanetary DustAn update M. L. Kaiser, K. Goetz, C. St. Cyr, R. Howard

  2. DMSP/GPS Behind New software uploaded Did NOT cause impulses to stop

  3. Periodic, too!

  4. Adapted from Wang et al., Plan & Spa. Sci., 54, 957-966, 2006.

  5. 17 SECCHI HI-1A compound debris events • 100% correlation with S/WAVES impacts

  6. Grün’s Interplanetary Dust Distribution at 1 AU Grün, E, et al., Icarus, 62, 244-272 (1985) The BIG problem Observed flux Implied mass

  7. Summary • S/WAVES observes impulse-like signatures consistent with dust impacts • Most prominent on Ahead • Weaker and less frequent on Behind • Most prominent on antenna closest to ‘ram’ direction (X on Ahead, Z on Behind) • Most events consistent with 1-10 micron sized particles • Occurrence in ecliptic longitude consistent with known wire antenna breaks • Sharp onset at ~309° observed by Ahead, GPS/DMSP, and Behind • S/WAVES impulse signatures coincident with ‘debris’ observed by SECCHI • SECCHI debris ~20 times as prevalent as on SOHO • Apparent 100% correlation with S/WAVES events • Implied mass and flux during active sectors much higher than Grün distribution • In general agreement during inactive sectors

More Related