1 / 21

T ransport and P ercolation in C omplex N etworks

T ransport and P ercolation in C omplex N etworks. Guanliang Li Advisor: H. Eugene Stanley Collaborators: Shlomo Havlin, Lidia A. Braunstein , Sergey V. Buldyrev and José S. Andrade Jr. Outline.

coye
Download Presentation

T ransport and P ercolation in C omplex N etworks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Transportand Percolationin Complex Networks Guanliang Li Advisor: H. Eugene Stanley Collaborators: Shlomo Havlin, Lidia A. Braunstein, Sergey V. Buldyrev and José S. Andrade Jr.

  2. Outline • Part I: Towards design principles for optimal transport networks G. Li,S. D. S. Reis, A. A. Moreira, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanleyand J. S. Andrade, Jr., PRL 104, 018701 (2010); PRE (submitted) Motivation: e.g. Improving the transport of New York subway system Questions: How to add the new lines?  How to design optimal transport network? • Part II: Percolation on spatially constrained networks D. Li, G. Li, K. Kosmidis, H. E. Stanley, A. Bunde and S. Havlin, EPL 93, 68004 (2011) Motivation: Understanding the structure and robustness of spatially constrained networks Questions: What are the percolation properties? Such as thresholds . . . What are the dimensions in percolation?  How are spatial constraints reflected in percolation properties of networks?

  3. Part I: Towards design principles for optimal transport networks Grid network G. Li,S. D. S. Reis, A. A. Moreira, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanleyand J. S. Andrade, Jr., PRL 104, 018701 (2010); PRE (submitted) Shortest path length ℓAB =6 ℓ ~ L D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks, Nature, 393 (1998). Randomly add some long-range links: small-world network ℓ ~log L A B ℓAB =3 L How to add the long-range links?

  4. Part I How to add the long-range links? Rich in short-range connections A few long-range connections Kleinberg model of social interactions J. Kleinberg, Navigation in a Small World, Nature 406, 845 (2000).

  5. Part I Kleinberg model continued P(rij) ~ rij- where   0, and rij is lattice distance between node i and j • Steps to create the network: • Randomly select a node i • Generate rij from P(rij), e.g. rij= 2 • Randomly select node j from those 8 nodes on dashed box • Connect i and j Q: Which  gives minimal average shortest distance ℓ ?

  6. Part I Optimal  in Kleinberg’s model Minimal ℓ occurs at =0 Without considering the cost of links d is the dimension of the lattice

  7. Part I Considering the cost of links • Each link has a cost  lengthr (e.g. airlines, subway) • Have budget to add long-range links (i.e. total cost is usually  system size N) • Trade-off between the number Nland length of added long-range links From P(r) ~ r- : =0, r is large, Nl =  / r is small  large, r is small, Nl is large Q: Which  gives minimal ℓ with cost constraint?

  8. Part I With cost constraint ℓ is the shortest path length from each node tothe central node Minimal ℓ occurs at =3

  9. Part I With cost constraint ℓ vs. L (Same data on log-log plots) Conclusion: For ≠3, ℓ ~ L For =3, ℓ ~ (ln L) 

  10. Part I With cost constraint Different lattice dimensions Optimal ℓ occurs at =d+1 (Total cost  ~ N) when N

  11. Part I Conclusion, part I For regular lattices, d=1, 2 and 3, optimal transport occurs at =d+1 More work can be found in thesis (chapter 3): • Extended to fractals, optimal transport occurs at = df +1 • Analytical approach Empirical evidence 1. Brain network: L. K. Gallos, H. A. Makse and M. Sigman, PNAS, 109, 2825 (2011). df =2.1±0.1, link length distribution obeys P(r) ~ r - with =3.1±0.1 2. Airport network: G. Bianconi, P. Pin and M. Marsili, PNAS, 106, 11433 (2009). d=2, distance distribution obeys P(r) ~ r - with =3.0±0.2

  12. Part II: Percolation on spatially constrained networks D. Li, G. Li, K. Kosmidis, H. E. Stanley, A. Bunde and S. Havlin, EPL 93, 68004 (2011) • P(r) ~ r - •  controls the strength of spatial constraint • =0, no spatial constraint  ER network •  large, strong spatial constraint  Regular lattice • Questions: • What are the percolation properties? Such as the critical thresholds, etc. • What are the fractal dimensions of the embedded network in percolation?

  13. Part II The embedded network Start from an empty lattice Add long-range connections with P(r) ~ r - until k ~ 4 Two special cases: =0 Erdős-Rényi(ER) network  large Regular 2D lattice

  14. Part II Percolation process Start randomly removing nodes Remove a fraction q of nodes, a giant component (red) exists Increase q, giant component breaks into small clusters when q exceeds a threshold qc, with pc=1-qc nodes remained small clusters giant component exists p pc

  15. Part II Giant component in percolation =1.5 =2.5 =3.5 =4.5

  16. Part II Result 1: Critical threshold pc 0.33

  17. Part II Result 2: Size of giant component: M M ~ N in percolation : critical exponent =0.76

  18. Part II Result 3: Dimensions M ~ N  in percolation • Percolation (p=pc): M ~ R df • Embedded network (p=1): N ~ R de • M ~ N df / de = df /de • Examples: • ER: df, de, but  =2/3 • 2D lattice: df=1.89, de=2,  =0.95 • So we compare  with df/de

  19. Part II compare  with df/de In percolation Embedded network N

  20. Part II Conclusion, part II: Three regimes K. Kosmidis, S. Havlin and A. Bunde, EPL 82, 48005 (2008)  ≤ d, ER (Mean Field) • > 2d, • Regular lattice Intermediate regime, depending on  Transport properties ℓ still show three regimes.

  21. Summary • For cost constrained networks, optimal transport occurs at =d+1 (regular lattices) or df +1 (fractals) • The structure of spatial constrained networks shows three regimes: •  ≤ d, ER (Mean Field) • d <  ≤ 2d, Intermediate regimes, percolation properties depend on  •  > 2d, Regular lattice

More Related