This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 23

PERMUTATION PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PERMUTATION. Evaluation Scenarios. BW = 10 MHz, N PRU = 48 (N 1 = 4, N 2 = 1). Scenario1 (Mixed Reuse 1&3 – equal size). Scenario 3 (Reuse 1). Scenario 2 (Mixed Reuse 1&3 – unequal size). Scenario 4 (Reuse 3). Evaluation Criteria Description. Diversity gain for distributed resources

PERMUTATION

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Evaluation Scenarios

BW = 10 MHz, NPRU = 48 (N1 = 4, N2 = 1)

Scenario1 (Mixed Reuse 1&3 – equal size)

Scenario 3 (Reuse 1)

Scenario 2 (Mixed Reuse 1&3 – unequal size)

Scenario 4 (Reuse 3)

Evaluation Criteria Description

• Diversity gain for distributed resources

• Calculate the equivalent SNR of each LRU and plot the histogram

• Find 10% outage SNR, i.e, the SNR value which can be achieved with outage 0.1.

• Scheduling gain for contiguous resources

• Calculate the equivalent SNR of each LRU and select the best LRU for each FFR. Plot the histogram of the best SNR.

• Find 10% outage SNR, i.e, the (best) SNR value which can be achieved with outage 0.1.

• Hit ratio for distributed resources

• Average number of subcarrier pairs hit by neighboring cell.

DL Permutation Demonstration Model

DLRU: Distributed LRU

Part IComparison of Subband Partitioning and Miniband Permutation Proposals

Comparison of Subband Partitioning and Miniband Permutations

• Compare Intel1, Intel2, LGE, Samsung, Motorola

• Same subcarrier perm used for all proposals

• perm_seq() israndom permutation

• Shift by symbol and subframe index according to Intel’s formula.

Study 1: 10% SNR Values

Scenario1 (Mixed Reuse 1&3 – equal size)

Scenario 3 (Reuse 1)

Scenario 2 (Mixed Reuse 1&3 – unequal size)

Scenario 4 (Reuse 3)

Conclusions of Part I

• Proposals from Intel (1&2), LGE, and Samsung have the best performance in terms of diversity and scheduling gain.

Part IIComparison of Subcarrier Permutation Proposals

Comparison of Subcarrier Permutation Proposals

• Compare subcarrier permutation proposed by Intel, LGE, Samsung, and random permutation

• Use Intel1 SB partitioning and Intel MB permutation

• Random permutation: PermSeq is random, shifted over symbols and subframes according to Intel’s formula.

• Calculate diversity gain for different subcarrier perms for Scenarios 1, 2, and 3.

Diversity gain: 10% SNR Values

Scenario1 (Mixed Reuse 1&3 – equal size)

Scenario 3 (Reuse 1)

Scenario 2 (Mixed Reuse 1&3 – unequal size)

Conclusions of Part II

• Subcarrier permutation methods proposed by Intel and Samsung have the best diversity gain.

Part IIIComparison of Average Hit Number

DL Hit Number Comparison

• Compare the number of hits among different Cell ID pairs for the subcarrier permutations proposed by Intel, Samsung and LGE.

• 0≤Cell_ID <512, 130816 Cell_ID Pairs

• Intel

• PermSeq remains the same for all cells.

• Samsung and LTE:

• Different PermSeq for different cells:

• LGE: different shift as function of Cell_ID

• Samsung: different SEED as function of Cell_ID

Hit Number Comparison

• k: number of subcarrier pairs hit within an LRU,

• (0 ≤ k ≤ kmax and kmax = Nsym*Lpair = 48)

• Calculate the fraction of LRUs hit at k≥12 subcarrier pairs (25%)

Reuse 1, NPRU = 48

Conclusions of Part III

• For small number of DRU Intel’s subcarrier permutation has the best performance.

• Intel and LGE’s subcarrier permutations have the best performance for large number of DRUs.