1 / 5

Miranda vs. Arizona

Miranda vs. Arizona. By: Josh C, Airiana M, Kent G, Tony A. Details. The court was called upon to consider the constitiuality of a number of instances, ruled on jointly, in which defenders were questioned. “while in custody or otherwise deprived of thief freedom in any significant way”.

cosima
Download Presentation

Miranda vs. Arizona

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Miranda vs. Arizona By: Josh C, Airiana M, Kent G, Tony A.

  2. Details • The court was called upon to consider the constitiuality of a number of instances, ruled on jointly, in which defenders were questioned. • “while in custody or otherwise deprived of thief freedom in any significant way”

  3. Background • Similarly, in Westover Vs. United States, the petitioner was arrested by the FBI, interrogated, and made to sign statements without being notified of his right to counsel.

  4. Self incrimination • This deals with amendment 5: shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against him self

  5. Miranda wins!! • Provided guidelines for law enforcements when arresting and interrogating suspects. The suspects must be made aware of their right, before interrogation, to remain silent and to have an attorney.

More Related