1 / 16

Evaluating Nutrition Information

Evaluating Nutrition Information. 1. Sources of Nutrition Information. Government (Dietary Guidelines/ MyPlate) Diet and health books Internet websites Food packaging Family and Friends Media (TV, newspapers, magazines) Published findings of scientific studies Classes

cosima
Download Presentation

Evaluating Nutrition Information

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluating Nutrition Information

  2. 1. Sources of Nutrition Information • Government (Dietary Guidelines/ MyPlate) • Diet and health books • Internet websites • Food packaging • Family and Friends • Media (TV, newspapers, magazines) • Published findings of scientific studies • Classes • Nutritionists/dieticians

  3. 2. Sorting Fact from Fallacies • People tend to believe what they hear repeatedly • To increase number of viewers (and make more money), media sensationalizes and over simplifies nutrition topics • Reports on studies’ findings often over state or distort information or lack important details • Be alert to the influences of your food choices • Recognize preconceived ideas about nutrition • Keep an open mind to current scientific evidence • Think critically

  4. 3. The Science of Nutrition • Scientific studies are the cornerstone to reliable nutrition information • Antidotal evidence (reports of people’s individual experiences) can also be useful

  5. 4. Scientific Process • Researchers test hypotheses (educated guesses) that arise from observations of a phenomena • Hypotheses are tested by researchers conducting a “study” (an experiment or doing research)

  6. 5. Types of Nutrition Studies EPIDEMIOLOGICAL • Compares disease rates among population groups and attempts to identify related conditions/behaviors (ex. Diet and exercise) • Examples: - observation of scurry in sailors’ - observation of low rate of breast cancer in Japanese • Shows correlation (relationships between diet and disease) but not causation (the actual reason for the observation)

  7. Types of Nutrition Studies ANIMAL STUDIES • Used as a starting point to help explain a hypotheses • Used because human studies are difficult to conduct and expensive • Must be followed-up with cell or human studies to verify findings because animals are differently physically and mental than humans

  8. Types of Nutrition Studies CELL CULTURE STUDIES • Specific human body cells are isolated and grown in a laboratory • Study the effects of nutrients on cell processes • Nutrigenomics • The science of how genes, diet and disease interact to create health problems • Certain genes determine susceptibility to disease • Certain foods turn disease susceptibility genes on or off • Knowing family genetic tendencies helps determine best diet for the individual • Part of biochemical individuality

  9. Types of Nutrition Studies HUMAN STUDIES • Case Control Studies • Small-scale epidemiological study • 2 closely-matching groups (age, gender, race) • One group has the health condition (ex. Diabetes) being examined, the other does not • Identify the factors (ex. Vegetable consumption) that differ between the groups • Provides clues about cause and prevention of disease

  10. Types of Nutrition Studies HUMAN STUDIES • Clinical Trials • Researchers make a change (ex. Diet or exercise) and study the effects • Two subject groups: Experimental (people are given or make the change) and Control (similar people are not given or make the change) • Health and disease differences are measured between the two groups

  11. Types of Nutrition Studies First Clinical Trial • Sailors on long ocean voyages in 1747 • Given oranges and lemons and did not develop scurvy (a condition of joint pain, skin sores and bleeding gums) • Something in the oranges/lemons prevented the disease • 40 years later – common practice to provide sailors with citrus fruit (limes, lemons, oranges) on long sea voyages to prevent scurvy – “Limeys” • 200 years later (1930’s) vitamin C is discovered as the “something” in citrus that prevented scurvy

  12. 6. Reducing Errors (Bias) inHuman Studies • Groups as randomly assigned • Blind studies - Use of placebos (treatment or pill that only looks like the actual treatment of pill) • Double-blind study – Both the subjects and the researchers do not know who is or is not receiving the actual treatment/pill or a placebo • Expectation of treatment/pill effect (even when receiving the placebo) can alter study results. (Ex. Bulimia)

  13. 7. Understanding Published Nutrition Information A) Why is nutrition information confusing and often contradictory? • Nutrition science is constantly changing with new findings from studies • Some studies are flawed (contain bias or errors)

  14. Understanding Published Nutrition Information B) How is nutrition information disseminated (spread)? • Researchers publish their study findings in professional scientific journals • Before reliable study findings are published, they are peer-reviewed (judged/critiqued by other researchers) • Professional scientific journals are not commonly read by the general public

  15. Understanding Published Nutrition Information C) What are the types (sources) of published nutrition information? • Primary – Professional scientific journals • Secondary – Scientific magazines/articles/books based on primary source • Science writing – General magazine, newspaper articles or books written by science writers • Mass media – Nightly news reports and internet websites/blogs Every time findings from the original research is summarized and restated, inaccuracies in interpretation of the information is possible

  16. 8. Evaluating Internet Information • There are no rules for posting on the Internet • Consider the source • Who are the authors or sponsors of the site? • Is the information presented cited or documented? • Is the site up-to-date? • What are the qualifications of the author/sponsor? • .edu, .gov, and .org sites are more creditable than .com sites. • What is the motivation for the site? (education or selling products) • When studies are cited, consider their quality and purpose. Just because it is in print does not mean it is true.

More Related