1 / 23

The Results Agenda: Where Are We? Overview and Progress to Date

DAC Development Partnership Forum December 11, 2002. The Results Agenda: Where Are We? Overview and Progress to Date. Table of Contents. I. Managing for Results : Background II. Managing for Results : Action Plan III. Terminology, Abbreviations and Acronyms.

corydon
Download Presentation

The Results Agenda: Where Are We? Overview and Progress to Date

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DAC Development Partnership Forum December 11, 2002 The Results Agenda: Where Are We?Overview and Progress to Date

  2. Table of Contents I. Managing for Results : Background II. Managing for Results : Action Plan III. Terminology, Abbreviations and Acronyms

  3. I. Managing for Results: Background

  4. External Context • Building on the Monterrey/Doha/Johannesburg (“MDJ”) mandates : focus on country outcomes, emphasis on Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)… • June - International Roundtable on Better Measuring, Monitoring and Managing for Development Results • July - IDA13 Agreement and focus on country results, including MDGs and related goals • September - Development Committee endorsed Bank’s overall approach to increasing its results orientation and urged implementation.

  5. Internal Context • Country Business Model: Discussed by Development Committee in Prague; identified four step process—vision (PRSP); diagnosis (CPIA); programming (CAS); and results. Much work hitherto on first three. • Results-Based Management: Bank has been managing for deliveries and quality. Much work and progress on system development (for tracking lending and knowledge services) and on quality. • Development Effectiveness: OED and QAG analyses provide basis for accountability and learning; need to strengthen links to strategy formulation and and day-to-day management. Bottom line: All point to timeliness of enhanced results focus …

  6. II. Managing for Results:Action Plan

  7. December 18 : CODE Discussion of Implementation Plan Support for national strategy development (PRSP…) and capacity building Knowledge accumulation and dissemination Bank strategy and instruments Staff learning and incentives Corporate reporting Managing for Results: Implementation

  8. Strengthen support for results-focused PRSPs, with clear linkages. Publish PRSP Sourcebook with relevant guidance on measurement and monitoring; and publish guidelines for JSAs on Annual Progress Reports. Focus staff assessments of PRSPs and Annual Progress Reports focused on targets and monitoring of results.FY03 Q1-4 Help countries build statistical systems and analytic capacity to measure and track outcomes and other results. In consultation with partners, design and pilot instrument for enhanced sector-wide support for statistical capacity building. (STATCAP template has already been developed, as simplified financing instrument.) FY03 Q1-4 Help countries build results-based public expenditure management systems, and monitoring and evaluation capacity.Develop/agree Bank approach across units, as basis for reflecting diagnostic tools and possible follow-up support to countries via CAS process.FY03 PRSP and Capacity Building

  9. Support countries’ achievement of MDGs and other development outcomes through advice and research. Undertake research and prepare policy notes on actions that lead to the achievement of the MDGs, as input into country teams preparing outcome-oriented ESW. (The first deliverables to be based on six country studies—Albania, Argentina, Bangladesh, Uganda, Vietnam, and Yemen—currently underway.) WDR 2004 to present lessons learned on how countries can accelerate progress toward the MDGs by making services work for poor people. FY03 Provide clients with a clear and consistent window for accessing knowledge and best-practice examples across sectors and themes. Review existing knowledge dissemination mechanisms. Adopt harmonized approach to dissemination and knowledge management, making use of Development Gateway. FY03 Q3 Client-Focused Knowledge Accumulation and Dissemination

  10. Establish results-based CAS to show clear results-chain linking country outcomes to Bank products and services. Launch results-based CASs in five countries. Five pilots : Brazil, Cambodia, Cameroon, Sri Lanka, and Ukraine. FY03 Develop results-based CAS monitoring and evaluation framework. Pilot CAS completion report and associated peer-review mechanism. FY03 Increase feedback from clients on Bank contribution to results.Revise client survey instrument and align timing with CAS cycle.FY03 Q3-4 Enhance results focus of products and services, and linkages to CAS outcomes.As part of the ongoing review of the design of, and guidelines for, Bank lending and nonlending products, strengthen respective monitoring and evaluation frameworks to enhance results focusand alignment with results-based CAS.FY03-04 Bank Strategy and Instruments

  11. New CAS Results Framework • Objective is to improve Bank performance by using intended results to define Bankprogram design ex ante and to assess program success ex post. • Starts from country objectives (outcome and outputs) to set Bank’s country program (inputs), taking into account what other partners are doing. • Framework includes CAS matrix and M&E Framework, follow-up in the CAS Progress Report, CAS Completion Report, QAG peer review CAS exit assessment, and OED Country Assistance Evaluation (CAE). This is akin to project cycle M&E framework.

  12. CAS—Results Tracking CAS CAS Progress Report CAS Completion Report CAS Exit Assessment(QAG) Country Assistance Evaluation (OED) Next CAS Lessons Learned CAS Results Matrix provides links across various reports

  13. CAS Results Matrix CAS matrix to capture three main areas: • CASCountry Outcomes—selected country goals from the PRSP (or national strategy), such as the MDGs and sector-specific issues that contribute to these goals. • CAS Intermediate Outcomes—expected country outcomes achievable in the CAS period, which Bank’s interventions support in partnership with other donors. • Bank Inputs and Outputs—planned Bank interventions supporting these CAS intermediate outcomes (taking account of partners’ activities) with associated targets to monitor Bank performance management.

  14. CAS Implementation: Assessing Progress During CAS implementation, CAS results matrix used to: • Track priority CAS outcomes • Assess annual progress towards goals • Review strategies and actions under way • Review key indicators CAS Progress Reports to become more systematic, assessing progress against results framework—and determining need for mid-course correction in CAS strategy and/or programs.

  15. CAS Completion and Evaluation of Results • Self Assessment: At end of CAS cycle, the team prepares the CAS Completion Report (CCR) using results framework to assess extent to which results were achieved. For key areas of Bank involvement, CCR would compare baseline values, expected outputs and outcomes as laid out in CAS, and actuals at time of CAS completion. CCR would be an input into CAS design,annexed to the CAS provided to Executive Directors. • Peer Assessment: QAG would assess quality/results at exit, drawing on CCR and other information. • Independent Assessment: As at present, OED would periodically carry out Country Assistance Evaluation, typically spanning more than one CAS period.

  16. Linking M&E Frameworks InvestmentLending M&E PRSP M&E Framework CAS Results Framework AdjustmentLending M&E ESW Other Analytic & advisory work Other Donors’Portfolio’s M&E

  17. Existing framework for projects consists of logical framework based on development objectives that are monitored through self-assessment, peer-assessment and independent assessment throughout project cycle. Framework is broadly appropriate, but results-focus needs to be sharpened through: Development objectives that are more outcome-oriented and quantified More logical links between expected outputs and development objectives Monitorable indicators of both outputs and outcome-oriented development objectives. New priority is coherence with PRSP and CAS M&E frameworks. This is not just good architecture; it also provides a motivational key to systematic implementation. M&E Framework for Results-focusedLending Operations

  18. Ensure that staff learning activities, in terms of strategic priorities, timeliness and specific learning content, are aligned with focus on sustained development results. Learning Board to proactively manage staff learning, including in allocation of FY04 resources. FY03-04 Make best practice into standard Bank practice in managing for results. Good Practice Handbook on Managing for Results, with framework and best-practice examplesFY03 Q3-4 Provide staff with consistent training on results-based approaches.Assess training needs. Review and rationalize supply of results-based M&E training. FY03 Q2-4 Ensure that internal staff incentives are aligned with focus on sustained development results.Review staff incentives and revise as necessary to reflect enhanced results focus. FY03 Staff Learning and Incentives

  19. Report on Results in corporate strategy and budget documents.Review of corporate planning and budget cycle to assess methods for integrating results. Pilot test in FY03 for further integration in corporate reporting in FY04.FY03-FY04 Enhanced results focus of quality assessments of products and services.Increase results focus of quality at entry, supervision, and ESW assessments carried out by Quality Assurance Group. Develop Annual Report on Portfolio Performance and Results. FY03 Q2-4FY04 Design system to report IDA Deputies on IDA-eligible country results.Develop and refine results measurement system for IDA-eligible countries based on country-specific results defined in PRSPs and supported through CASs and operations. FY03 Q1-4 Corporate Reporting

  20. November 4 : IDA13 Technical Meeting November 12 : Informal Board Meeting - “Building Statistical Capacity to Monitor Development Progress” December 11-12 : DAC Development Partnership Forum December 18 : CODE Discussion of Implementation Plan February 23-25 : Joint High-Level Forum on Harmonization April 11, 2003 : IDA Donors Meeting on Results System (tentative date) April 13, 2003 : Development Committee Calendar of Events

  21. III. Results :Terminology, Abbreviations and Acronyms

  22. Definitions: Results Terminology

  23. Abbreviations and Acronyms CAS Country Assistance Strategy CODE Committee of Development Effectiveness CPIA Country Policy and Institutional Assessment DAC Development Assistance Committee ESW Economic and Sector Work IDA International Development Agency JSA Joint Staff Assessment M&E Monitoring and Evaluation OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development OED Operations Evaluation Department PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper QAG Quality Assurance Group WDR World Development Report

More Related