html5-img
1 / 10

Increasing Field Integral between Velo and TT

Increasing Field Integral between Velo and TT. S. Blusk Sept 02, 2009. SU Group Meeting. Introduction. Recall, for the Upgrade, we will read out the full detector at 40 MHz. Need to quickly reject uninteresting events and select B events. MinBias:B event ~ 200:1, but can exploit:

corbin
Download Presentation

Increasing Field Integral between Velo and TT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Increasing Field Integralbetween Velo and TT S. Blusk Sept 02, 2009 SU Group Meeting

  2. Introduction • Recall, for the Upgrade, we will read out the full detector at 40 MHz. • Need to quickly reject uninteresting events and select B events. • MinBias:B event ~ 200:1, but can exploit: • “Large” B mass  large q2  B tracks have larger pT, on average • Tracks from Min Bias events peak at lower pT, but do have tails out to larger pT. • Exploit in trigger by requiring N tracks at “high” pT.(cut value to be tuned, but roughly expect ~ 1-2 GeV) • Also, require that they do not point back to one of the primary interactions. (only want to do this check for a small subset of the tracks) • Goal: To use TT to get a quick estimate of each particle’s pT. Aim for 10% resolution, in reNeed sufficient

  3. TT in LHCb • Four layers of silicon • X1, U(+5o), V(-5o), X2 • ~200 um pitch: shit~50 mm

  4. A view from inside the magnet OT1 TT Beampipe (10 mrad) IT-1 Bellows Flanges

  5. s1/p / (1/p) = 10% s1/p / (1/p) = 20% s1/p / (1/p) = 30% Efficiency “Turn on” for pT>1 GeVvs pT resolution E.g: • With ~10% resolution in1/pT, almost no trackswith pT<0.7-0.8 GeV would pass trigger. • With 30% resolution,~6-7% of tracks at pT<0.5 GeV would be accepted. Min Bias at 5 TeV 67% have pT<0.5 GeV 91% have pT<1 GeV 96% have pT<1.5 GeV

  6. Efficiency “Turn on” for pT>1.5 GeVvs pT resolution E.g: • With ~10% resolution in1/pT, almost no trackswith pT<1.0 GeV would pass trigger. • With 30% resolution,~2% of tracks at pT<0.5 GeV would be accepted.

  7. Momentum Resolution for VeloTT tracks • Run Standard MC (5 TeV) • Form VeloTT tracks from ALL VELO-3D tracks • Default would only make VeloTT tracks with VELO 3D tracks that don’t make long tracks • Shift Magnetic Field upstream by 50 cmand do the same. • Puts more field integral between Velo & TT • We do the Kalman Track Fit • Assume that track fit can be done relatively fast, alathe current HLT2 scheme with parameterized materialdescription.

  8. Comparison of pT Resolutions By shifting the field by ~50 cmupstream, we get about a factorof 2 improvement in pT resolution. 10% resolution attainableby moving the magnet… For comparison, long trackshave a resolution of 0.5%

  9. Issues • If we were to move the magnet upstream,might lose some acceptance on outer edges • TT would be more “inside the magnet” • I think we can get adequate coverage though • If you’ve seen a silicon detector inserted into the bore of CDF, CLEO… you know what “tight space” means!

  10. Summary • Reduce pT uncertainty by ~ 2X by moving magnet 50 cm upstream • Other things to do: • Remove RICH-1 from “default” and “shifted” • Simulation at – 25 cm • Look at rejection power after pT cuts and IP cuts at different luminosities. • …

More Related