1 / 7

Daglig borerapport

Daglig borerapport. Input to project from IIP. Summary. Met and reviewed with operators and vendors Operators Statoil Hydro Conocophillips Total Vendors Peloton Landmark Approximately 140 issues. Main comments 1. Time codes/activities/operations

Download Presentation

Daglig borerapport

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Daglig borerapport Input to project from IIP

  2. Summary • Met and reviewed with operators and vendors • Operators • Statoil • Hydro • Conocophillips • Total • Vendors • Peloton • Landmark • Approximately 140 issues

  3. Main comments 1 • Time codes/activities/operations • Some of the CDRS structure is not logical to companies • Superior to contain “BOP TEST” • “INTERUPTION” not linked to operation interrupted • Done differently • Seems to be a need for more downtime details than CDRS provides (Phase2 ?) • How to describe what is being done? (Phase 2?) • Hydro suggests new structure • Complex job.... • Implementation input • Formation should be selected from a list of legal values. • General Project input • How to handle tight wells

  4. Main comments 2 • Other relevant information which may be included (Phase 2?) • Cementing • Period of operation • More “drilling like” units of measure • Survey tools in stead of Single shot measurement indicator • Selection of formation should be possible • Datums (reference points) • Mean sea level • Wellhead • Casing type • Tapered string • Expandable • Pressurized coring • Indicator

  5. Main comments • Continued... • Well stimulation (At well testing) • Indicator • KICK • “Shallow water kick” is a kick type • Perforation • Shot density • RIG • RIG ID (Included) • RIGTYPE • Bit data • Side track • Technical side track (BP) • Geological side track (BP)

  6. Open tasks in project • Issue resolution • Comments from other project participants • Report layout? • Sections • Header • Survey • Log • Operations • ..etc • XML • To ensure consistency between terminology and RDL, XML team should be involved now • Specification has to tell XML team to include link (RDL ID) in XML schemas • Pilots – how, where and when?

  7. Current Plan Date Task 26.01  Project meeting (1-06) 24.02  CDRS Drilling reporting terminology suggested. 06.03  Meeting Hydro 07.03  Meeting Statoil 08.03  Meeting ConocoPhillips 09.03  Meeting BP 10.03  Start updating according to feedback from meetings and review 23.03 Project meeting (2-06) 31.03 Terminology work complete 31.03 Start XML work 25.04 Project meeting (3-06) 23.05 Project meeting (4-06) 01.08 Start Pilot – 1 month 31.08 Project meeting (n-06) – decision to recommends implementation

More Related